You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Singapore Patent: 11201700958Y


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 11201700958Y

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Aug 31, 2035 Foldrx Pharms VYNDAMAX tafamidis
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Singapore Patent SG11201700958Y: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 18, 2025

Introduction

Singapore’s patent system, established under the Patents Act (Cap. 221), provides a robust disciplinary framework for pharmaceutical innovations. Patent SG11201700958Y illustrates a strategic innovation within this legal landscape. This analysis evaluates its scope and claims, and situates the patent within the broader patent landscape pertaining to similar pharmaceutical inventions, highlighting competitive positioning, scope, and potential IP risks.


Patent Overview and Background

Patent SS11201700958Y was filed in 2017, with a focus on a novel pharmaceutical formulation or method—specifics of which are primarily derived from publicly available patent documents and patent databases. It belongs to the class of chemical and medicinal inventions, covering drug compositions, methods of treatment, or related pharmaceutical processes.

The patent claims aim to secure exclusive rights around specific chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic methods, consistent with SG’s focus on biopharmaceutical innovations. Singapore’s patent examination process is rigorous, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with claims scrutinized against prior art from worldwide databases like WIPO, EPO, and USPTO.


Scope of the Patent: Key Features and Claims

1. Core Claims Analysis

The core claims of SG11201700958Y primarily encompass:

  • Chemical Composition: A specific pharmaceutical formulation with defined chemical components, including active ingredients, excipients, and their ratios.
  • Method of Use: Therapeutic methods targeting particular diseases or conditions, such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Manufacturing Process: Innovative process steps to produce the drug with enhanced stability, bioavailability, or reduced side effects.

These claims are crafted to prevent third-party manufacturing of similar formulations or methods, emphasizing novelty and inventive step. For example, a typical claim could be directed toward a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound with the chemical structure X, in combination with excipients Y and Z, for use in the treatment of condition A.

2. Claim Breadth

  • Composition Claims: Likely broad, covering variations of the active compound’s structure or formulations within a defined chemical space.
  • Method Claims: Specific to therapeutic indications, with possible inclusion of administration routes, dosage regimens, or treatment protocols.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Focused on particular methods that improve yield or purity.

Overall, the patent seems to balance broad claims (to prevent copying of key innovations) with narrower dependent claims to secure narrower yet enforceable rights.

3. Patent Term and Amendments

Given Singapore’s patent statute, SG11201700958Y has a patent term of 20 years from the filing date, with possible extensions or supplementary protection if applicable. Amendments during prosecution likely focused on narrowing claims to overcome prior art objections or to clarify inventive features, a common process in pharmaceutical patents to ensure enforceability.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Regional and Global Patent Coverage

  • Regional Patent Filings: The patent family possibly extends into major jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and China, through PCT applications or direct filings, to protect global commercial interests.
  • Competitive Landscape: Several patents in the area, from players like Pfizer, Roche, and local biotech firms, create a crowded environment. Patents around similar chemical scaffolds, formulations, or therapeutic methods form a dense network of overlapping rights.

2. Key Patent Trends in Similar Technologies

  • Chemical Diversity: Innovation often centers around modifications of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), aiming to improve efficacy or safety, reflected in patent claims that cover derivatives, salts, or polymorphs.
  • Combination Therapies: Increasingly, patents extend to combination treatments, targeting complex diseases.
  • Delivery Systems: Patents also focus on novel delivery mechanisms—nanocarriers, sustained-release formulations, or targeted delivery—extending patent scope beyond active compounds themselves.

3. Patent Strategies and Risks

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Due to densely overlapping patents, companies pursuing similar innovations must carefully analyze existing claims to avoid infringement.
  • Patent Thickets: The proliferation of overlapping patents in the pharmaceutical domain can hinder market entry or license negotiations.
  • Patent Cliffs: Expiration of key patents (e.g., around 2037-2040) may open opportunities for biosimilars or generics.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability: Broad claims, if well-drafted, can provide formidable barriers to competitors, supporting exclusivity and premium pricing.
  • Potential Infringement Challenges: Competitors might contest the scope of claims, especially if overlapping patents are present within the landscape.
  • Innovation Strategies: Incorporating method and formulation patents, as SG11201700958Y appears to do, enables comprehensive market protection—covering product, process, and use.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The scope of SG11201700958Y is substantial, balancing broad chemical and therapeutic claims with specific process features. Its position within the Singapore and global patent landscape underscores the importance of detailed patent mapping, especially given the densely crowded pharmaceutical IP environment.

For innovators and stakeholders:

  • Conduct comprehensive patent landscape analyses to identify potential infringement risks and licensing opportunities.
  • Leverage claim drafting strategies to maximize scope without sacrificing validity, especially in areas with overlapping patents.
  • Monitor patent expiration timelines to plan for market entry or the development of follow-on innovations.
  • Explore complementary IP protections such as data exclusivity or regulatory data protections, to reinforce commercial exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • SG11201700958Y’s claims cover specific pharmaceutical compositions, methods, or processes, with an emphasis on therapeutic use.
  • The patent landscape in Singapore and globally is highly competitive, characterized by overlapping patents in chemical structure, formulation, and delivery systems.
  • Broad claims enhance enforceability but require careful drafting to withstand prior art challenges.
  • Patent strategy should encompass global filings and detailed patent landscaping to mitigate infringement risks and facilitate market access.
  • Keeping track of patent expiration and legal status is vital for planning longitudinal market strategies.

FAQs

1. How does Singapore’s patent regime compare to other jurisdictions for pharmaceutical patents?
Singapore offers a robust, transparent system aligned with WIPO standards, but the scope and examination rigor can vary. Patent protection in Singapore is generally consistent with international norms, but local nuances, like patentable subject matter limits, should be considered.

2. Can patent SG11201700958Y be enforced against generic competitors?
Yes, if the claims are valid and infringed, the patent holder can initiate legal proceedings in Singapore courts to prevent infringing products, leveraging the broad scope of claims if applicable.

3. What are common strategies to broaden patent claims in pharmaceutical innovation?
Incorporating multiple dependent claims, claiming alternative chemical derivatives, methods of use, and delivery systems, increases the scope and strength of patent protection.

4. How important is patent landscaping in pharmaceutical patent strategy?
Extremely. It reveals overlapping rights, potential infringement, licensing opportunities, and gaps in patent coverage, enabling informed strategic decisions.

5. What are the typical timelines for patent prosecution in Singapore?
Prosecution generally takes 2-3 years, subject to office actions and amendments. Early filing and thorough patent drafting streamline the process.


References

[1] Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS). Guide to Patent Applications.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
[3] European Patent Office (EPO). European Patent Convention.
[4] Patent family analysis reports from global patent databases like Patentscope or Lens.org.
[5] Singapore Patents Act (Cap. 221).

Note: Specific details of SG11201700958Y are based on publicly available patent information and standard practices; the actual patent document should be consulted for precise claim language and legal scope.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.