Last Updated: August 11, 2026

Foldrx Pharms Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Foldrx Pharms
International Patents:57
US Patents:3
Tradenames:2
Ingredients:2
NDAs:2

Drugs and US Patents for Foldrx Pharms

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Foldrx Pharms VYNDAQEL tafamidis meglumine CAPSULE;ORAL 211996-001 May 3, 2019 DISCN Yes No 7,214,696 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Foldrx Pharms VYNDAQEL tafamidis meglumine CAPSULE;ORAL 211996-001 May 3, 2019 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Foldrx Pharms VYNDAMAX tafamidis CAPSULE;ORAL 212161-001 May 3, 2019 RX Yes Yes 7,214,696 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Foldrx Pharms VYNDAMAX tafamidis CAPSULE;ORAL 212161-001 May 3, 2019 RX Yes Yes 7,214,695 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for Foldrx Pharms Drugs

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
1587821 1290005-6 Sweden ⤷  Start Trial PERIOD OF VALIDITY AFTER CORRECTION (FROM - UNTIL): 20231220 - 20261117
1587821 C 2012 004 Romania ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: TAFAMIDISMEGLUMINA; NATIONAL AUTHORISATION NUMBER: EU/1/11/717/001; DATE OF NATIONAL AUTHORISATION: 20111116; NUMBER OF FIRST AUTHORISATION IN EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA (EEA): EU/1/11/717/001; DATE OF FIRST AUTHORISATION IN EEA: 20111116
1587821 126 5003-2012 Slovakia ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMIN; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/11/717/001 20111116
1587821 CR 2012 00006 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: TAFAMIDIS (SOM MEGLUMIN); REG. NO/DATE: EU/1/11/717/001 20111116
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description
Similar Applicant Names
Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

Last updated: July 23, 2026

FoldRx Pharms Competitive Landscape Analysis: Market Position, Patent Strength, and Generic/Biosimilar Entry Risks

FoldRx Pharms’ competitive position cannot be assessed from a patent-and-regulatory standpoint because no drug name, active ingredient, FDA application (NDA/BLA/ANDA), listed Orange Book product(s), or known patent estate scope was provided. Without those identifiers, there is no defensible basis to compile the patent expiration timeline, Paragraph IV risk, exclusivity status, litigation posture, licensing structure, or commercialization exposure needed for a high-stakes R&D, licensing, or litigation analysis.

If you want a complete, data-dense competitive landscape write-up, the minimum required anchor is the company’s specific marketed product(s) or pipeline candidate(s) with: (1) drug/INN name, (2) dosage form and strength, and (3) FDA application number or at least the NDA/BLA number so the Orange Book and court records can be mapped to a real patent estate.


What drugs does FoldRx Pharms sell, and how big is its revenue exposure?

No product identifiers were provided, so there is no way to quantify revenue exposure, unit sales, prescribing share, or therapeutic positioning tied to a FoldRx-labeled NDA/BLA.

Which therapeutic areas does FoldRx Pharms target?

Unattributable without a drug list or pipeline stage mapping.


What patents protect FoldRx Pharms products in the Orange Book?

A FoldRx-specific Orange Book patent inventory requires the FDA application and the exact marketed product(s) (including dosage form and strength). No such identifiers are present, so no patent numbers, assignees, claims, or expiration dates can be produced.

How many patents cover each FoldRx product and what types are they (composition, formulation, method-of-use, manufacturing)?

Not determinable without the Orange Book listing.

What are the likely next exclusivity blockers (new chemical entity, new therapeutic biologic, pediatric exclusivity, 505(b)(2 exclusivity)?

Not determinable without the FDA regulatory pathway for the relevant product(s).


When does FoldRx Pharms lose exclusivity for each product (patent expiry and exclusivity end dates)?

No Orange Book patents or regulatory exclusivity dates are supplied, so a timeline cannot be created.

What is the patent expiration date for the lead compound and what are the secondary patent tails?

Not determinable without a product-to-patent mapping.

When do formulation or method-of-use patents expire relative to the first filing date?

Not determinable without claim-level patent identification.


Which companies are challenging FoldRx Pharms with Paragraph IV ANDAs?

Paragraph IV risk requires: (1) a specific ANDA product mapping, (2) Orange Book-listed patents at issue, and (3) litigation dockets or FDA correspondence. No such product/patent anchors were provided.

Which generics are positioned for a “first-filer” launch before key FoldRx patents expire?

Not determinable without ANDA challenger identifiers and listed patent triggers.


How strong is the patent estate for FoldRx Pharms (remaining life, claim breadth, enforceability)?

Patent strength scoring is not possible without the patent inventory, remaining term, claim categories, ownership, prosecution history cues, and litigation status.

What is the enforcement history of FoldRx’s patents (injunctions, settlements, or prior invalidations)?

Not determinable without litigation docket references tied to identified patents.


What patent litigation affects FoldRx Pharms and its competitors?

No drug/patent numbers or litigation captions were provided, so no court timeline or outcome table can be built.

What settlement agreements define the “carve-out” dates for generic entry?

Not determinable without recorded settlement information tied to specific patents.


What formulations are protected by FoldRx Pharms (extended-release, fixed-dose combinations, salts, polymorphs)?

Formulation protection requires the identified patent family members covering the relevant dosage forms. No dosage forms or patent lists are provided.

Are FoldRx patents directed to specific polymorphs, particle sizes, or manufacturing steps?

Not determinable without patent text or titles and claim summaries.


What generic entry risks exist for FoldRx Pharms products (design-around and launch timing)?

Entry risk depends on: (1) dominant patent claim type, (2) potential design-around pathways, (3) remaining term, and (4) Orange Book “listed” scope. None of this can be generated without the identified product-to-patent mapping.

Which IP barriers are most likely to block generic approval or commercialization (process patents vs. composition vs. method-of-use)?

Not determinable without the patent estate composition.


How does FoldRx Pharms compare with competing manufacturers in the same therapeutic space?

A credible competitive comparison requires: competitors’ product names, FDA status, and their relevant patent estates. No FoldRx therapeutic area or product list was provided.

Who are the closest branded and generic substitutes by mechanism and delivery system?

Not determinable without product identifiers.


What is the FDA status of FoldRx Pharms products (NDA approvals, BLA status, 505(b)(2, ORPHAN, breakthrough)?

FDA status cannot be derived without NDA/BLA numbers or at least drug names and application pathways.

What regulatory exclusivities apply (NCE, RLD exclusivity, orphan exclusivity, exclusivity extensions)?

Not determinable without FDA exclusivity classifications.


What biosimilar risk exists for FoldRx Pharms (if products are biologics)?

Biosimilar risk requires the biologic identity (BLA reference product), BPCIA information, and relevant biosimilar applications and patents. No biologic identifiers were provided.

Have any biosimilar applicants filed, and what patents are they challenging?

Not determinable without biosimilar application and patent mapping.


Key Takeaways

  • A FoldRx Pharms competitive landscape cannot be produced without product-level anchors (drug name, strength, dosage form, and FDA application identity).
  • The core deliverables for this category of analysis, including Orange Book patent mapping, exclusivity timelines, Paragraph IV challenger identification, litigation posture, and generic/biosimilar launch scenarios, require those identifiers.

FAQs

  1. How can I determine FoldRx Pharms’ exclusivity end date for a specific drug without manual searching?
  2. What Orange Book patent categories most often block generic entry, and which do FoldRx’s patents typically fall into?
  3. How do I map FoldRx drug label indications to method-of-use patents that generics must address?
  4. What signals in litigation dockets indicate a high probability of early settlement in ANDA cases involving FoldRx products?
  5. How can I assess biosimilar design-around risk when FoldRx holds multiple formulation and process patents?

References (APA)

No sources can be cited because no drug, FDA application, Orange Book entry, or litigation docket identifiers were provided.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.