You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Serbia Patent: 63866


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Serbia Patent: 63866

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,265,402 May 11, 2025 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
10,576,156 Feb 6, 2038 Ars Pharms Operation NEFFY epinephrine
10,682,414 Feb 6, 2039 Ars Pharms Operation NEFFY epinephrine
11,173,209 Feb 6, 2038 Ars Pharms Operation NEFFY epinephrine
11,191,838 Feb 6, 2039 Ars Pharms Operation NEFFY epinephrine
11,717,571 Feb 6, 2039 Ars Pharms Operation NEFFY epinephrine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Serbia Patent RS63866

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Patent RS63866, granted in Serbia, revolves around innovative pharmaceutical technology, with potential implications for therapeutic efficacy, manufacturing process, or formulation. As Serbia aligns with European Union intellectual property standards, understanding the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides critical insights for stakeholders ranging from pharmaceutical companies to generic manufacturers and legal professionals.

This comprehensive review offers an in-depth examination of RS63866, focusing on its claims scope, strategic positioning, and the patent landscape in Serbia and neighboring jurisdictions.


Overview of Serbia Patent RS63866

Serbia’s patent system is governed by the Patent Law ("Zakon o patentima"), aligning closely with the European Patent Convention (EPC) framework. RS63866 was likely filed to secure exclusive rights over a specific pharmaceutical invention, safeguarding innovative aspects such as a novel compound, formulation, or manufacturing process.

While the exact filing and grant dates are proprietary, the patent maintains enforceable rights within Serbia and potentially serves as a stepping stone for regional or European patent applications under the European Patent Office (EPO) or PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) routes.


Scope and Claims Analysis of RS63866

1. Nature of the Patent Claims

The core of RS63866 centers on the claims section, which delineates the legal scope of protection. Claims are categorized as:

  • Product Claims: Cover specific chemical entities, compounds, or compositions.
  • Use Claims: Protect the application or therapeutic utility of the compound.
  • Process Claims: Encompass methods of synthesis or manufacturing.
  • Formulation Claims: Focus on specific dosage forms, delivery systems, or formulations.

Understanding the breadth and specificity of these claims reveals the patent’s defensibility and potential overlap with existing patents.

2. Main Features of the Claims

Without disclosure of the full claim text, a typical pharmaceutical patent like RS63866 might include:

  • Compound Claims: Covering a novel chemical entity with particular substitutions or stereochemistry, indicating inventive novelty over prior art.
  • Use Claims: Claiming therapeutic indications, such as treatment of specific diseases or conditions.
  • Process Claims: Innovative manufacturing steps that improve synthesis efficiency, yield, or purity.
  • Combination Claims: Covering combinations with other drugs or excipients that offer synergistic effects.

3. Claim Limitations and Validity

The patent's claims are likely drafted with consideration for:

  • Novelty: The chemical compound or process must not be documented previously.
  • Inventive Step: Sufficient inventive difference over prior art, including existing patents, scientific literature, or known compounds.
  • Industrial Applicability: The claims must have a practical use, particularly in medicine or manufacturing.

4. Scope of Protection

Given typical patent strategies, RS63866 may have narrow claims aimed at specific derivatives or broad experimental claims covering classes of compounds. Broader claims enhance market exclusivity but risk being challenged for lack of sufficient inventive step.

5. Claim Strategy in Pharmaceutical Patents

Pharmaceutical patents tend to include:

  • Independent Claims: Broad, overarching claims.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specific embodiments adding legal layering.

The differentiation influences enforceability and potential for patent infringement litigation.


Patent Landscape in Serbia and Regional Context

1. Serbian Patent Environment

Serbia is a contracting member of the European Patent Organization (EPO) and ratified the European Patent Convention. Its patent system favors:

  • National patents (like RS63866)
  • European patents designating Serbia (which must be validated locally)
  • PCT applications, offering broader regional coverage.

The Serbian patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is thus interconnected with European patents, with local enforcement being critical for market exclusivity.

2. Existing Patent Families and Similar Technologies

In the European and Serbian local contexts, patent landscapes include:

  • Similar compound patents: Covering chemical classes with overlapping structures.
  • Formulation patents: Protecting delivery systems, sustained release, or specific excipients.
  • Process patents: Protecting synthetic routes, which might be shared or challenged.

Reviewing patent databases (e.g., Espacenet, the Serbian Intellectual Property Office database) reveals existing patents with similar claims, indicating the scope of possible overlaps or freedom-to-operate assessments.

3. Patent Clusters and Opportunities

Patent landscaping indicates clusters around specific therapeutic classes, such as:

  • Oncology drugs
  • Antiviral agents
  • Central nervous system (CNS) treatments

If RS63866 claims novel compounds or methods in these areas, competitors might have existing patents restricting use or manufacturing.

4. Regional and International Patent Strategy

Pharmaceutical companies seeking protection beyond Serbia often extend national patents through European patents or PCT applications to maximize geographic coverage. The patent landscape analysis should include:

  • Key prior art references that could challenge the patent.
  • Potential overlaps with existing claims in overlapping jurisdictions.
  • Opportunities to strengthen claims during prosecution to avoid infringement issues.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Validity and Enforcement

In Serbia, patent enforceability depends on robust prosecution, clear claims, and defense against invalidation. Recent patent challenges in the region have focused on:

  • Lack of inventive step
  • Insufficient disclosure
  • Prior art public domain

Thus, strategic patent drafting and diligent maintenance are vital.

2. Commercial Strategy

Patent RS63866 provides a competitive edge in Serbia’s pharmaceutical market, enabling:

  • Exclusive manufacturing or licensing
  • Strategic alliances
  • Market penetration with reduced infringement risks

Additionally, effective patent protection supports R&D investments and fosters innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • RS63866 likely encompasses specific chemical compounds, formulations, or manufacturing processes, with claims structured to balance broad coverage and specificity.
  • The patent landscape in Serbia is closely linked to European patent strategies, with existing patents on similar compounds or formulations shaping operational decisions.
  • Careful analysis of claim scope reveals potential vulnerabilities or opportunities for extending patent coverage via regional applications.
  • Success in patent enforcement and management depends on strategic prosecution, continuous monitoring of prior art, and active portfolio management.
  • Stakeholders should integrate patent landscape analysis into R&D and commercialization plans, particularly when developing classes of pharmaceuticals with significant intellectual property stakes.

FAQs

Q1: How does Serbian patent law influence pharmaceutical patent strategies?
Serbian patent laws, aligned with EPC standards, emphasize inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability. Strict prosecution necessitates precise claims and thorough prior art searches, influencing how pharmaceutical patents are drafted and prosecuted.

Q2: Can RS63866 be enforced outside Serbia?
Enforcement outside Serbia requires obtaining corresponding patents or extensions in target jurisdictions, such as through European patent applications or PCT routes. International protection hinges on strategic filings matching RS63866's scope.

Q3: What are common challenges in patenting pharmaceutical compounds in Serbia?
Key challenges include demonstrating inventive step over prior art, managing claim scope to avoid invalidation, and navigating regional patent examiners’ interpretations of novelty and usefulness.

Q4: How does patent landscaping impact licensing opportunities?
Landscape analysis identifies freedom-to-operate, potential licensors, and infringement risks, enabling informed licensing negotiations and strategic market entry decisions.

Q5: What is the significance of process patents in pharmaceuticals?
Process patents safeguard manufacturing methods, often providing a competitive advantage through efficiency or patenting novel synthetic routes. They complement product claims to strengthen overall IP protection.


References

  1. Serbian Patent Law ("Zakon o patentima"), Official Gazette of Serbia.
  2. European Patent Convention (EPC), European Patent Office.
  3. Espacenet Patent Database, European Patent Office.
  4. WIPO PCT Patent Applications, World Intellectual Property Organization.
  5. Market analysis reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Serbia.

This analysis provides a technical yet strategic understanding tailored for professionals aiming to optimize their intellectual property assets within Serbia’s pharmaceutical sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.