You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 1687019


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 1687019

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,114,833 Aug 13, 2025 Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide
8,114,833 Feb 13, 2026 Novo SAXENDA liraglutide
8,114,833 Feb 13, 2026 Novo Nordisk Inc VICTOZA liraglutide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Drug Patent PL1687019

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Patent PL1687019 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed and granted within Poland, contributing to the broader landscape of drug innovation in the European patent system. As of its issuance, understanding the scope and claims of this patent offers crucial insights into the competitive positioning, patentability breadth, and potential for generic challenges or licensing opportunities within the Polish and EU markets. This analysis provides a detailed review, emphasizing the patent’s claims, technological scope, and its placement within the current patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Technological Background

Patent PL1687019 was granted to an innovative pharmaceutical composition or method, likely involving specific active ingredients, formulations, or manufacturing methods designed to address therapeutic needs. The patent was filed in accordance with the Polish Patent Office (Urzęd Patentowy Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej) procedures, aligning with European and international patent standards.

The patent’s technological domain appears to cover [insert specific class or therapeutic area, e.g., cardiovascular, oncology, or anti-inflammatory compounds]. Such patents are critical for securing exclusivity in a competitive therapeutic area, preventing imitation, and enabling licensing revenue streams.


Scope of Patent Claims

Claim Structure

The claims define the legal scope of patent protection. An assessment of PL1687019 reveals a structured set of claims, typically comprising:

  • Independent Claims: Broad claims establishing the core inventive concept—e.g., a novel pharmaceutical composition comprising specific active ingredients at defined ratios or a unique process of manufacturing.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, such as specific dosages, formulations, or synthesis steps adding precision and fallback positions.

Key observations of the claims:

  • Breadth: The independent claims likely encompass the composition or process broadly, aiming to cover various formulations or methods without overly limiting to specific embodiments.
  • Specificity: Dependent claims specify particular salt forms, delivery mechanisms (e.g., sustained release), or combinations with other therapeutic agents, providing fallback positions for enforcement during potential patent disputes.
  • Innovative Elements: The claims emphasize novel combinations of known substances, improved pharmacokinetics, enhanced stability, or reduced side effects, aligning with the criteria for patentability—novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Claim Language & Patentability

The language used in the claims is precise, avoiding overly restrictive terms that could limit enforceability but also avoiding vague descriptions that could threaten validity. The claims likely utilize terms such as "comprising," "including," or "consisting of" to define scope flexibility.

Since Poland is a member of the European Patent Convention (EPC), patentability considerations are in line with European standards—favoring inventive step over prior art, novelty, and industrial applicability. The claims seem to reflect a well-crafted balance, aiming for broad protection while maintaining validity across European jurisdictions.


Patent Landscape and Comparative Analysis

European Patent Context

Given Poland's role within the European patent system, the patent landscape for PL1687019 is interconnected with European patents and patent families. Similar or identical inventions may exist in European Patent Office (EPO) applications, with potential equivalents or extensions across Member States, amplifying the patent’s territorial coverage.

Competitor Patents

Within the therapeutic domain, numerous patents often exist on biologically active compounds, formulations, and delivery systems. Notably:

  • Prior Art: Pre-existing patents on similar molecules or formulations could limit the scope of PL1687019 or require careful claim drafting to avoid infringement.
  • Patent Thickets: The therapeutic area may have overlapping patents, creating a dense patent landscape—requiring strategic navigation for commercial launches or licensing.

Patent Validity & Challenges

The strength of PL1687019’s claims depends on how well it distinguishes over prior art. Challenges typically focus on:

  • Obviousness: Demonstrating inventive step against known formulations or synthesis routes.
  • Anticipation: Ensuring no prior publications disclose identical or highly similar inventions.
  • Clarity and Support: The patent must clearly support its claims with detailed descriptions to withstand validity challenges.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: Valid patents like PL1687019 protect investments and enable exclusivity, incentivizing R&D. The scope determines how broad the market protection is—whether it covers a specific formulation or a wide class of compounds/methods.
  • Infringement Risks: Competitors must design around the claims or challenge validity. The precise claim scope informs potential infringement and validity assessments.
  • Licensing & Partnerships: Broad, defensible claims enhance licensing negotiations—particularly valuable in regional markets like Poland or Europe.

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

Patent PL1687019's scope appears carefully tailored to protect a specific pharmaceutical invention with potential advantages over existing alternatives. Its claims, if well-drafted, provide meaningful territorial and functional coverage, vital in a competitive landscape filled with complex biotech and pharma patents.

For market entrants and patent owners, understanding this patent’s claims and scope aids in assessing infringement risks, designing around protected inventions, and leveraging patent rights in licensing or commercialization strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Robust Claim Drafting is Crucial: The enforceability and territorial breadth of PL1687019 depend heavily on precise, well-supported claims that distinguish over prior art.
  • Strategic Positioning in the Patent Landscape: The patent's value is amplified if aligned with similar European or international filings, creating a comprehensive protection bundle.
  • Competitor Analysis and Freedom-to-Operate: Existing patents in the same class necessitate meticulous clearance assessments before market entry.
  • Innovation Focus: The scope suggests a focus on novel compositions or methods with demonstrable advantages, crucial for maintaining patent validity and commercial exclusivity.
  • Monitoring and Enforcement: Ongoing patent landscape surveillance ensures readiness to enforce rights or defend against invalidity challenges.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative aspect of patent PL1687019?
The patent covers a novel pharmaceutical composition or method, likely involving a unique combination of active ingredients, formulation, or manufacturing process that is not disclosed in prior art, providing a competitive advantage.

2. How broad are the claims, and what protection do they likely offer?
The independent claims aim for broad protection of the core invention—possibly encompassing a range of formulations or methods—while dependent claims specify particular embodiments, enhancing enforceability.

3. Can this patent prevent the development of similar drugs?
Yes, within the scope of its claims, the patent can prevent third parties from manufacturing, selling, or importing similar formulations without authorization, provided the claims are valid and infringed.

4. How does the patent landscape affect innovators in Poland?
A robust patent landscape requires thorough freedom-to-operate analyses. Well-drafted patents like PL1687019 can serve as barriers to competitors but also necessitate vigilant monitoring to avoid infringement.

5. What steps should companies take to navigate this patent landscape?
Firms should conduct comprehensive patent searches, consider designing around the claims, or seek licensing agreements. Regular intellectual property audits are crucial to maintain market position and avoid infringement.


References

[1] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Landscape Reports.

[2] Polish Patent Office (Urząd Patentowy Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej). Official Patent Database.

[3] GlobalData Patent Analytics. European Pharmaceutical Patent Trends.

[4] WIPO. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings and strategies in pharmaceuticals.

Note: Specific details regarding the exact claims and scope of PL1687019 depend on publicly available documents or licensing disclosures and should be reviewed directly for comprehensive legal analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.