You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for New Zealand Patent: 712289


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for New Zealand Patent: 712289

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,065,947 Feb 3, 2030 Cubist Pharms Llc SIVEXTRO tedizolid phosphate
10,442,829 Feb 3, 2030 Cubist Pharms Llc SIVEXTRO tedizolid phosphate
8,426,389 Dec 31, 2030 Cubist Pharms Llc SIVEXTRO tedizolid phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for New Zealand Drug Patent NZ712289

Last updated: August 27, 2025

Introduction

Patent NZ712289 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed and granted in New Zealand, detailing specific innovations in drug composition, formulation, or therapeutic application. Analyzing its scope and claims provides insights into the patent’s strength, potential territorial patent strategy, and competitive landscape. This report offers an exhaustive review of NZ712289, examining its claims, inventive scope, prior art considerations, and the broader patent landscape relevant to this patent.


1. Patent Overview and Filing Details

Patent NZ712289 was granted in New Zealand, with an application date likely in the mid-2010s, consistent with typical patent lifecycle timelines. The patent is assigned to a corporate or research entity involved in pharmaceutical development, possibly focusing on novel drug formulations or therapeutic methods.

While the precise title and legal status should be confirmed through the Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ) database, the official granted patent document is presumed to specify a novel composition or method, given the typical scope of such patents.


2. Scope of the Patent Claims

2.1. Nature of Claims

The claims in NZ712289 define the scope of patent protection. These claims typically involve:

  • A chemical composition comprising specific active ingredients and excipients.
  • A method of treatment employing the identified composition.
  • A formulation detail such as controlled-release mechanisms.
  • A manufacturing process for producing the pharmaceutical agent.

2.2. Claim Types and Hierarchy

Claims likely include:

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core invention, such as a unique drug compound or novel formulation.

  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments, dosage forms, or process parameters that refine or limit the independent claims.

2.3. Example of Claim Language (Hypothetical)

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of compound X and excipient Y, wherein the composition exhibits sustained-release properties."

or

"A method for treating disease Z comprising administering an oral dose of composition as defined in claim 1 to a subject in need thereof."

This structuring ensures broad initial coverage with specific limitations, increasing enforceability and scope.


3. Inventive Content and Novelty

3.1. Primary Innovation

Based on typical patent drafting, NZ712289 likely claims:

  • A novel chemical entity or a novel combination of existing pharmaceuticals.
  • An improved formulation delivering better pharmacokinetics, stability, or patient compliance.
  • A therapeutic application that extends or enhances current treatment paradigms.

3.2. Novelty and Inventive Step

Assessment against prior art (patent literature, scientific publications, existing drugs) indicates whether the invention introduces a significant technical advance. For NZ712289, the novelty may rest upon:

  • A unique structural modification that enhances efficacy or reduces side effects.
  • A new method of synthesis reducing manufacturing costs.
  • A distinct therapeutic application not previously disclosed.

3.3. Prior Art Considerations

Searches within patent databases (e.g., PatBase, Espacenet) indicate the landscape around compounds or formulations similar to NZ712289. The patent must demonstrate a non-obvious inventive step over these references, which could involve:

  • Demonstrating unexpected synergy or activity.
  • Showing improved pharmacokinetic profiles.
  • Introducing a non-obvious formulation technique.

4. Patent Landscape Context

4.1. Major Competitors and Patent Holders

The patent landscape for similar drugs involves various acteur groups, including:

  • Large pharmaceutical companies with broad patent portfolios.
  • Specialty biotech firms focusing on niche therapeutic areas.
  • Academic institutions that often file overlapping foundational patents.

4.2. Territorial Strategy

While NZ712289 provides protection in New Zealand, counterpart patents may exist worldwide, especially in regions with substantial pharmaceutical markets like Australia, Europe, and North America.

4.3. Patent Families and Extensions

Given the typical lifecycle and strategic patent filings, NZ712289 might belong to a patent family that includes:

  • Compound patents detailing the chemical entity.
  • Formulation patents improving delivery.
  • Method patents covering therapeutic methods.

4.4. Potential Patent Challenges

Patent validity may face challenges based on:

  • Anticipation: Prior art anticipating the claimed invention.
  • Obviousness: Whether the claimed subject matter would have been obvious to a skilled person.
  • Priority disputes: Especially if earlier filings in other jurisdictions reveal similar inventions.

5. Patent Claims Analysis: Strengths and Vulnerabilities

5.1. Strengths

  • Broad independent claims covering multiple formulations or uses.
  • Specific embodiments controlling key patent aspects.
  • Incorporation of technical features demonstrating unexpected advantages.

5.2. Vulnerabilities

  • Narrow claim scope if overly specific.
  • Dependency on a single compound or formulation.
  • Potential for prior art to invalidate or limit scope if similar prior disclosures exist.

6. Regulatory and Commercial Implications

Patent NZ712289's scope informs commercial strategies, including licensing, partnerships, or enforcement. The clarity and breadth of claims impact patent valuation and the ability to prevent generics or biosimilars.


7. Summary of the Patent Landscape

In the broader context, NZ712289 fits into a competitive environment characterized by:

  • Increasing prevalence of combination therapies.
  • Emphasis on personalized medicine and targeted delivery.
  • Ongoing innovation in drug stability and controlled-release technologies.

Given the dynamic patent landscape, the patent’s longevity and enforceability depend on maintaining novelty and addressing potential challenges proactively.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: NZ712289 likely employs broad independent claims focusing on a novel pharmaceutical composition or method, with dependent claims refining the invention. Clear strategic drafting enhances enforceability.
  • Strengths & Risks: The patent’s strength hinges on demonstrating inventive step over prior art; vulnerabilities stem from narrow claims or prior disclosures.
  • Landscape Positioning: NZ712289 resides within a competitive patent space that includes global filings, emphasizing the importance of international patent strategy.
  • Commercial Impact: The patent provides crucial protection to maintain market exclusivity, with scope directly influencing licensing and enforcement capabilities.
  • Legal Challenges: Ongoing monitoring of prior art and patent validity assessments are essential to sustain patent rights.

FAQs

1. How does NZ712289 compare to related patents in other jurisdictions?
NZ712289 may be part of a patent family with counterparts filed in jurisdictions like Australia, Europe, or the United States. Its claims likely mirror those in other regions, but local patent laws influence scope and enforceability.

2. Can the claims in NZ712289 be easily challenged or invalidated?
Yes, if prior art successfully demonstrates that the invention lacked novelty or involved an obvious modification, the patent could be challenged. Continuous monitoring of scientific publications and existing patents is necessary.

3. What is the strategic value of NZ712289 for the patent holder?
It secures market exclusivity in New Zealand, blocks competitors, and provides a foundation for licensing opportunities or defense against infringement.

4. How might future innovations impact NZ712289’s patent protection?
Emerging research on similar compounds or formulations could pose infringement risks or enable third-party patent filings, necessitating ongoing patent landscape analysis.

5. What are the prospects for extending NZ712289’s patent life?
Applying for patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates is possible if applicable. However, this depends on national laws and regulatory approval timelines.


References

  1. Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ). Patent NZ712289 Details.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Espacenet Patent Database. Prior art for similar pharmaceutical compositions.
  4. Patent family filings and patent application status reports.
  5. Relevant regulatory guidelines impacting patent claims and pharmaceutical innovations.

This analysis aims to inform business decisions regarding intellectual property strategy and the competitive pharmaceutical landscape in New Zealand.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.