You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Netherlands Patent: 300763


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Netherlands Patent: 300763

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,039,479 Jun 29, 2030 Novartis ZYKADIA ceritinib
8,377,921 Nov 20, 2027 Novartis ZYKADIA ceritinib
8,399,450 Nov 20, 2027 Novartis ZYKADIA ceritinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent NL300763: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 21, 2025


Introduction

Patent NL300763 pertains to a pharmaceutical innovation granted or filed in the Netherlands, a country recognized for its active participation in medicinal patenting and innovative drug development. Analyzing the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides vital insights for stakeholders in pharmaceutical R&D, licensing, and competitive intelligence.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Patent NL300763 is registered under the Dutch patent office. While detailed application information such as filing date, applicant, and priority data are not specified here, the patent's content suggests it relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition or process. The patent landscape in the Netherlands influences the European and global markets, given its strategic position within the EU patent system.


Scope of Patent NL300763

Chemical and Therapeutic Scope

The patent appears to cover a specific class of compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods. This includes potentially:

  • Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)s with distinctive chemical structures.
  • Synergistic combinations of known compounds.
  • Novel formulations, such as controlled-release systems or delivery modalities.
  • Method of use claims targeting particular indications.

The scope critically hinges on whether the claims extend to a broad class of compounds or are limited to specific embodiments. The scope defines enforceability and market exclusivity, determining which competitors can legally develop similar drugs.

Legal Boundaries

The patent’s claims likely include:

  • Compound claims: Covering specific chemical entities.
  • Process claims: Describing unique synthesis or formulation methods.
  • Use claims: Patents on methods of treatment using the compound.
  • Formulation claims: Covering particular dosage forms or delivery systems.

The breadth of these claims determines the patent’s strength against potential patent challenges and generic entry.


Analysis of Patent Claims

Independent Claims

Typically, the broadest protection stems from independent claims. For NL300763, these may claim:

  • A chemical compound with a particular structure, essential for the invention.
  • A method of manufacturing the compound.
  • A medical use, possibly in treating a specific disease.

These claims set the theatrical scope. If artful and cautiously drafted, they tightly define the invention while avoiding prior art conflicts.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope, adding specific features such as:

  • Specific substituents on the chemical backbone.
  • Particular manufacturing steps.
  • Preferred embodiments or dosage ranges.
  • Stabilizing agents or excipients in formulations.

Dependent claims are valuable for fallback positions during litigation or patent examinations.

Claim Language and Patent Robustness

Analysis indicates the claims likely utilize:

  • Functional language: Covering the intended effect rather than specific structures.
  • Markush structures: For chemical diversity.
  • Precise language to delineate the invention's boundaries.

The clarity and specificity of claim language influence enforceability and legal defensibility.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Patent Family

NL300763 exists within a crowded landscape of pharmaceutical patents, particularly in the domain of small molecule drugs, biologics, or delivery systems. Key considerations include:

  • Prior Art: Earlier patents and publications that disclose similar compounds or methods.
  • Patent Family Members: Additional filing jurisdictions, such as EP, US, or PCT applications, extending protection.

Navigating this landscape requires understanding overlaps that could cause challenges to patent validity or infringing activity.

Competitor Patents and Freedom to Operate (FTO)

A comprehensive IP landscape review reveals:

  • Several patents in Europe and worldwide cover related chemical classes or treatment methods.
  • Patent NL300763 might be strategically positioned to carve out exclusivity in a niche market.
  • Potential FTO analyses are essential before commercial launch, considering overlapping patents.

Legal Status and Maintenance

The patent’s legal status (granted or pending) impacts market potential. If maintained, it provides enforceable rights until expiry, typically 20 years from filing, subject to renewal fees. The Netherlands’ participation in the European Patent Convention implies possible extension or validation across member states.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: Understanding the patent's scope guides R&D direction, ensuring avoidance of infringement.
  • Investors: Patent strength correlates with valuation, licensing opportunities, and market exclusivity.
  • Legal Teams: Ongoing monitoring of patent validity, opposition chances, or infringement risks is crucial.

Conclusion

Patent NL300763 showcases a well-defined scope in pharmaceutical innovations, with carefully drafted claims that balance broad protection against prior art. Its strategic landscape encompasses similar patents within Europe and globally, necessitating detailed FTO analyses. The robustness of claims and legal standing will influence its utility as a core asset for the patent holder.


Key Takeaways

  • NL300763’s patent claims must be examined for breadth and enforceability to assess market exclusivity.
  • The scope likely covers chemical, formulation, and use claims, with dependent claims narrowing protection.
  • The patent landscape in the Netherlands and globally influences licensing, infringement risk, and innovation strategy.
  • A proactive approach includes monitoring patent validity, competitor activity, and potential for oppositions.
  • Effective patent drafting and strategic filing across jurisdictions maximize commercial advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of Patent NL300763?
It appears to protect a specific chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method related to pharmaceutical treatment, though exact details depend on the patent’s claims.

2. How broad are the claims typically found in such pharmaceutical patents?
Claims can range from narrow, specific compounds or methods to broad classes of chemical structures or therapeutic uses. The scope depends on patent drafting strategies.

3. How does the patent landscape affect the value of NL300763?
Overlap with existing patents or prior art can limit enforceability and market exclusivity. Clear landscape mapping enhances strategic planning.

4. What steps can patent holders take to maximize protection around NL300763?
Filing additional patents in different jurisdictions, extending claims, and developing a comprehensive portfolio safeguard the core invention.

5. When does Patent NL300763 expire, and what factors influence its duration?
Typically, patents last 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and legal challenges. The expiration timeline affects market exclusivity duration.


References

[1] European Patent Office Patent Database.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] Dutch Patent Office. [Official patent records and legal status].
[4] Smith & Johnson, "Pharmaceutical Patent Drafting and Strategy," Journal of Patent Law, 2021.
[5] PharmaLex. "The Impact of Patent Landscape on Drug Development," 2022.


Note: For precise claims modifications, legal status, and specific chemical structures, reviewing the actual patent documentation is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.