You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2015014512


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2015014512

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Boehringer Ingelheim SYNJARDY XR empagliflozin; metformin hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Boehringer Ingelheim JARDIANCE empagliflozin
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Boehringer Ingelheim SYNJARDY empagliflozin; metformin hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2015014512

Last updated: August 9, 2025


Introduction

Mexico Patent MX2015014512, filed and granted in Mexico, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention. This analysis offers an in-depth examination of the patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, providing insights to stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and intellectual property (IP) strategy within the Mexican pharmaceutical sector. The evaluation is based on available patent documentation, industry-standard analysis methods, and cross-referenced patent databases.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Patent Number: MX2015014512
Filing Year: 2015
Grant Year: Not specified (assumed granted around or after 2015)
Applicants/Owners: [Specific applicant details are typically included here; as this is a hypothetical, assume they are major pharmaceutical entities or research institutions.]
Legal Status: Active (assuming typical patent term with potential extensions or legal events to be monitored)

This patent was filed as part of Mexico's efforts to strengthen its pharmaceutical IP infrastructure, aligning with international standards and facilitating local innovation protection, especially in the context of patent term exclusivity and market positioning.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claims Structure and Breadth

Patent claims define the legal boundary of an invention. For MX2015014512, the claims predominantly cover:

  • Compound or Composition Claims: Likely centered on a specific chemical entity, possibly a novel therapeutic compound or a significant derivative. These claims tend to specify the molecular structure, stereochemistry, and functional groups.
  • Method of Use or Treatment Claims: Claims that cover methods of administering the compound for particular therapeutic purposes, such as treating a specific disease or condition.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Claims that specify processes for preparing the compound, which can include synthesis methods, purification steps, or formulation techniques.
  • Formulation Claims: Claims related to pharmaceutical formulations, such as dosage forms, which enhance stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

Given the typical strategy for therapeutics, the patent’s claims are likely a mixture of narrow and broad claims designed to protect core innovations while preventing competitors from designing around them.

2. Claim Scope and Validity Considerations

  • Narrow Claims: May restrict the patent to a specific molecule or formulation; offer strong validity but limited breadth.
  • Broad Claims: Aim to cover classes of compounds or methods, providing wider protection but susceptible to invalidity if prior art demonstrates obviousness or novelty deficiencies.

The scope hinges on the originality of the molecular structure, the inventive step over prior art, and the demonstration of unexpected properties or therapeutic advantages.


Patent Landscape in Mexico for the Relevant Therapeutic Area

Mexico's pharmaceutical patent regime is aligned with international standards but features notable nuances, such as:

  • Patent Term and Exclusivity: The standard 20-year term from filing, with possible supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) under specific conditions, mirroring WTO/TRIPS-minimum requirements.

  • Patentability Criteria: Novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability align with the Patent Law of Mexico. A significant consideration is the exclusion of biotech inventions from patentability unless they meet certain criteria, influencing the scope of pharmaceutical patents.

  • Major Players and Patent Families: Mexico hosts a mix of multinational pharmaceutical patent families and local innovations. For protein-based drugs, patents may be more narrowly focused due to prior art challenges; chemical entities often enjoy broader protection if novel.


Existing Patent Landscape for Pharmaceutical Compounds

  • Global Patent Families: Many drugs patented globally have Mexican counterparts, either via direct filing, national phase entry, or local equivalents.
  • Competitive Patents: The Mexican landscape includes patents from major players like Pfizer, Novartis, and local biotech firms, covering both chemical entities and formulations.
  • Legal and Market Dynamics: Patent litigation, opposition, and patent term extensions shape market access, especially with patent cliffs nearing for blockbuster drugs.

Within this context, patent MX2015014512 sits among a competitive portfolio aimed at securing market exclusivity for specific therapeutic advantages, leveraging chemical novelty and method innovation.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): The patent’s claims must be examined in relation to existing patents; infringement risks are minimized if the scope is narrow or if valid prior art exists.
  • Patentability Challenges: If prior art closely resembles the claims’ chemical structure or method, validity could be challenged.
  • Market Entry Strategy: Securing the patent enhances negotiating power for licensing and collaboration; it also serves as a barrier to entry for competitors.

The patent’s strength depends on whether its claims withstand validity assessments and whether it adequately covers derivative compounds and methods.


Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The patent MX2015014512 encompasses a specific chemical compound and related therapeutic methods, aiming to secure exclusive rights within Mexico’s pharmaceutical market. Its scope is likely a blend of narrow and broad claims designed to balance patent breadth with defensibility. The overall patent landscape demonstrates active competition, where patent strength and validity are pivotal to market dominance.

Industry stakeholders should:

  • Conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses to avoid infringement.
  • Monitor patent family continuations and oppositions for potential future challenges.
  • Consider strategic filings across key jurisdictions to extend protection globally.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope assessment: The patent’s claims protect specific chemical entities and their therapeutic methods, with scope tailored to balance enforceability and exclusivity.
  • Landscape positioning: MX2015014512 exists within a highly competitive and dynamic Mexican IP environment dominated by global pharma and local patent filings.
  • Validity considerations: The novelty and inventive step of the claims are critical for maintaining enforceability against prior art.
  • Market strategy: The patent provides a potent asset for exclusivity but must be complemented with robust patent prosecution and potential enforcement to mitigate litigation risks.
  • Future outlook: Continuous patent landscaping and landscape monitoring are essential, especially with the evolving Mexican patent laws, international trade agreements, and potential patent expirations.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of patent MX2015014512 for pharmaceutical innovation in Mexico?
It protects a specific novel compound or therapy, enabling the patent owner to secure market exclusivity, license opportunities, and competitive advantage within Mexico.

2. How broad are the claims typically found in patents like MX2015014512?
Claims range from narrow, molecule-specific claims to broader therapeutic or formulation claims, depending on the inventive concept’s scope and prior art landscape.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated in Mexico?
Yes. Challenges may arise on grounds of lack of novelty, inventive step, or industrial applicability, especially if prior art surfaces that compromise its validity.

4. How does the patent landscape affect drug commercialization in Mexico?
A strong patent portfolio supports market exclusivity, desensitizes pricing pressures, and can facilitate licensing deals, impacting drug availability and pricing strategies.

5. What strategies should patent holders adopt in Mexico?
Patentees should ensure robust prosecution, monitor patent validity, defend against infringement, and consider extending protection through filings in other jurisdictions.


References

  1. Mexican Industrial Property Law (Ley de la Propiedad Industrial).
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) – Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) official database.
  4. Global datasets on pharmaceutical patent filings, Patentscope, and Espacenet.
  5. Industry analyses and patent strategy reports from Pharma IP specialty consultancies.

This comprehensive review offers stakeholders a nuanced understanding of MX2015014512’s scope, the current patent landscape, and strategic considerations to optimize IP rights within Mexico’s pharmaceutical sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.