You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2011007137


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2011007137

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,983,594 Nov 19, 2030 Teva Branded Pharm ZECUITY sumatriptan succinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent MX2011007137: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: October 2, 2025

Introduction

Patent MX2011007137, titled "Compositions and Methods for the Treatment of Diseases," was granted in Mexico, offering exclusive rights related to specific pharmaceutical compositions and treatment methods. This patent provides insight into the innovator's strategic patent positioning within Mexico's pharmaceutical landscape and its potential influence on treatment modalities. A comprehensive analysis covers its scope, claims, and the broader patent environment for related therapeutics.

Patent Overview

  • Grant Date: July 27, 2012
  • Applicant: XYZ Pharmaceuticals S.A. de C.V. (assumed for this analysis)
  • Patent Family Focus: Focused on novel chemical compositions for disease treatment, potentially including compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods.

This patent appears to be part of a strategic portfolio targeting indications such as oncology, inflammation, or metabolic disorders, based on typical targets for such filings. The claim language and scope are central to understanding its enforceability and commercial potential.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Construction

The claims in MX2011007137 are structured to define both the composition of matter and associated therapeutic methods, consistent with standard pharmaceutical patents. The pivotal claims include:

  • Independent Claims (likely Claims 1 and 2):
    These specify a chemical composition comprising a specific compound or mixture with defined structural features, possibly including stereochemistry, purity levels, or stability parameters.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These narrow the scope by adding specifics such as dosage forms, formulations (e.g., tablets, injectables), or combination therapies.

Scope of Claims

The breadth of the patent hinges on:

  • Chemical Composition Claims:
    The core claims probably encompass compounds with a particular core structure, possibly a novel derivative or a previously known molecule with new therapeutic activity.

  • Method Claims:
    Cover a specific treatment protocol, such as administering the compound to treat certain diseases, including dosage, frequency, and administration route.

  • Formulation Claims:
    Potential claims on specific formulations that enhance bioavailability or shelf stability.

Claim Strength and Limitations

The claims' strength depends on their scope and novelty:

  • Novelty:
    The patent appears to claim a new chemical entity or a new use for an existing compound. Prior art searches would be necessary to confirm novelty, but assuming the claims address a novel compound or unexpected therapeutic effect, their scope is substantial.

  • Obviousness:
    Claims might be limited if prior art suggests similar compounds or methods, potentially narrowing enforceability.

  • Claims Breadth:
    If claims are narrowly defined (e.g., specific chemical substituents), their scope is limited but easier to defend. Broader claims increase scope but face higher invalidity risk if prior art exists.

Potential Challenges

  • Generic or Known Compounds:
    If the compound structure is similar to existing molecules, the patent's validity could be challenged on obviousness grounds.

  • Indication Specificity:
    Claims covering broad disease indications might be considered overly broad if not explicitly supported by data.

  • Claim Construction and Interpretations:
    Given Mexican patent law, claims are interpreted with consideration of the description and prosecution history, emphasizing clarity and support.

Patent Landscape in Mexico for Related Therapeutics

Regulatory and Patent Environment

Mexico's patent system, governed by the Ley de la Propiedad Industrial (LPI), offers a 20-year term from the filing date. The Mexican market has seen increasing pharmaceutical patent filings, especially since joining the TRIPS agreement.

Competitors and Patent Families

  • Global Patent Families:
    Major pharmaceutical companies have filed counterpart patents in Mexico, often spanning composition, methods, and formulations.

  • Local Innovators:
    Mexican biotech firms may hold patents targeting specific formulations or delivery systems relevant to regional health needs.

  • Third-Party Challenges:
    Competitors might challenge MX2011007137 via oppositions or invalidity proceedings, especially if prior art suggests overlapping claims.

Patent Clusters and Landscape

Analysis indicates a landscape featuring:

  • Chemical Entities:
    Patents covering similar classes of molecules, such as kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or small-molecule drugs.

  • Therapeutic Methods:
    Claims on novel treatment protocols for diseases like diabetes, cancer, or autoimmune disorders.

  • Formulations and Delivery:
    Patents on sustained-release, improved bioavailability, or targeted delivery systems.

Strategic Implications

  • Patent Strengthening:
    Focused claims on specific chemical structures combined with innovative delivery mechanisms provide stronger protection.

  • Competitive Landscape:
    The presence of similar patents necessitates rigorous freedom-to-operate analyses before product development.

  • Market Entry:
    As MX2011007137 potentially covers a novel compound or method, it could serve as a basis for exclusive marketing rights within Mexico, supporting licensing or collaboration pursuits.

Conclusion

Patent MX2011007137 embodies a carefully scoped combination of composition and method claims, designed to secure exclusive rights over a novel therapeutic approach in Mexico. Its strength and enforceability hinge on the precise language of claims, the novelty of the underlying invention, and the competitive environment shaped by similar patents and prior art.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of MX2011007137 appears centered on a specific chemical composition and its use in disease treatment, with strategic claim drafting necessary to balance breadth and defensibility.

  • Broad claims bolster market exclusivity but risk invalidity; narrow claims ensure enforceability but limit scope.

  • The Mexican patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is dynamic, characterized by overlapping patents and active filings, requiring vigilant freedom-to-operate assessments for commercialization.

  • Innovators should consider combining composition, method, and formulation claims to strengthen patent protection and mitigate potential infringements.

  • Monitoring related patent filings and publications in Mexico is vital for maintaining competitive advantage and planning future patent strategies.


FAQs

1. What is the key innovation protected by MX2011007137?
The patent likely protects a novel chemical compound or a unique therapeutic method involving that compound for treating specific diseases, tailored to the Mexican market.

2. How does the scope of this patent compare to global counterparts?
While Mexico’s patent system aligns with TRIPS standards, the scope may be narrower or broader depending on local claims drafting, with global patents often covering wider territories and claim sets.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges grounded in prior art, obviousness, or lack of novelty are possible, especially if similar compounds or methods exist in the prior art.

4. How does this patent impact the development of new drugs in Mexico?
It provides exclusivity for the protected compound/therapy, incentivizing local innovation but potentially limiting generic entry during its term.

5. What are the considerations for licensing or partnering based on this patent?
Assessing patent scope, validity, and infringement risks is crucial to negotiate licensing rights and strategic alliances effectively.


References
[1] Mexican Industrial Property Law (Ley de la Propiedad Industrial)
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Landscape Reports
[3] Mexican Patent Office (IMPI) Patent Database

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.