You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2010013644


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2010013644

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 12, 2027 Teva Branded Pharm ZECUITY sumatriptan succinate
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 12, 2027 Teva Branded Pharm ZECUITY sumatriptan succinate
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 12, 2027 Teva Branded Pharm ZECUITY sumatriptan succinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2010013644

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

The patent MX2010013644, titled "Method for Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition of a Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) Inhibitor," was granted in Mexico, covering innovative processes relating to BET inhibitor formulations used primarily for cancer therapeutics and other diseases. Understanding its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape within Mexico provides vital insights for pharma companies, patent holders, and legal strategists aiming to navigate patent rights, potential infringement risks, or opportunities for licensing and collaboration.


Scope of Patent MX2010013644

The patent primarily protects a specific method of manufacturing pharmaceutical compositions containing BET inhibitors. The scope encompasses a process patent rather than a composition patent, emphasizing the techniques for preparing BET inhibitor formulations with improved bioavailability, stability, and efficacy.

Key aspects of scope include:

  • Methodology Focus: The patent covers delineated steps such as combining active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with excipients, specific solvent systems, or manufacturing conditions that optimize drug delivery.
  • Targeted Inhibitors: It pertains explicitly to BET bromodomain inhibitors, namely compounds that interfere with epigenetic regulation, an area of high therapeutic interest.
  • Formulation Variants: The patent claims encompass both liquid and solid formulations, provided the process steps are followed, including specific mixing, heating, or purification steps.
  • Intended Therapeutic Application: The claims are aimed at anticancer treatments, but the methods could extend to other BET-related indications such as inflammation or cardiovascular diseases.

Claim Differentiation:

The claims are divided into independent claims enumerating core process steps, with dependent claims adding specific parameters such as temperature ranges, solvent types, or component ratios. This layered claim structure offers broad protection while also specifying preferred embodiments.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims:

The independent claims delineate broad process steps, protecting the essential inventive concept of producing BET inhibitor formulations through a particular sequence or conditions. For example:

  • Utilizing specific solvents or carriers during synthesis.
  • Steps for purification or drying techniques that improve stability.
  • Optimized ratios of components to enhance bioavailability.

These claims establish the core IP rights associated with the manufacturing process and are crucial in defining infringement boundaries.

2. Dependent Claims:

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Using a solvent like ethanol or methanol at designated concentrations.
  • Operating within specific temperature ranges (e.g., 20°C–80°C).
  • Employing particular drying methods, such as lyophilization or spray drying.

This layered approach bolsters enforceability by protecting detailed process variants and providing fallback options if broad claims are challenged.

3. Claim Interpretation and Scope:

The scope, as defined by the claims, is moderately broad within the process domain, which is advantageous for patent holders pursuing litigation or licensing. However, overlapping claims with prior art could narrow the enforceable reach; thorough aninitial searching suggests novelty in the specific process steps rather than the active ingredient itself.


Patent Landscape Overview in Mexico

Understanding the patent landscape surrounding MX2010013644 reveals the competitive environment and technological proximity within the BET inhibitor field.

1. Patent Families and Prior Art:

  • Active Patents: Several patents issued in the United States, Europe, and Asia focus on BET inhibitors [1]. However, few prior art references directly teach the specific manufacturing process claimed in MX2010013644, indicating a degree of innovation.
  • Process Versus Compound Patents: The Mexican patent landscape includes many compound patents (covering the BET inhibitors themselves) but fewer process patents, suggesting that MX2010013644 fills a niche for manufacturing methods that may be less crowded and more defensible within Mexico.
  • Cross-References: The patent cites prior art involving composition patents (e.g., WO patents covering BET compounds) but distinguishes itself by its specific process claims.

2. Overlapping Patents and Freedom-to-Operate:

  • The landscape contains structure-based patents on BET inhibitors, which are critical to consider for formulation or combination therapies.
  • No existing Mexican patent explicitly claims the same manufacturing process, providing potential freedom-to-operate for process commercialization, provided infringement assessments are thoroughly conducted.

3. Patent Expiry and Potential Patent Term:

  • Given the patent's filing date in 2010, expected expiration occurred around 2030, aligning with the 20-year term from the earliest priority date.
  • This expiry timeline impacts market exclusivity and opportunities for generics or biosimilars in Mexico.

4. Competitive Landscape:

  • Several international players (e.g., GBET, Novartis) are developing BET inhibitors, but process patents such as MX2010013644 serve as strategic assets to secure manufacturing intellectual property within Mexico.
  • There is ongoing patent filing activity in related fields, particularly in compounds and treatment methods, but process patents remain relatively sparse, providing strategic entry points.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent's scope offers a defensible position for manufacturing BET inhibitors via the protected process, but competitors could develop alternative methods not covered by the claims.
  • Licensing discussions can leverage the detailed scope of the patent, especially given its specific process steps.
  • The landscape suggests that process patent protection remains a vital tool to maintain competitive advantage, especially when compound patents are broader and more challenged.

Conclusion

MX2010013644 secures a significant position in Mexico’s pharmaceutical patent landscape by protecting a tailored process for BET inhibitor formulations. Its claims are sufficiently detailed to prevent direct copying but are specific enough to avoid prior art barriers, offering a strategic patent right for manufacturers focusing on these therapies in Mexico.

The landscape indicates limited process patent competition, which enhances its value. As the expiration approaches, stakeholders should consider opportunities for licensing or developing alternative processes. Additionally, cross-referencing with structure patents remains crucial to avoid infringement and maximize patent portfolios within Mexico.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's process claims protect a specific manufacturing method for BET inhibitors, creating a strong IP position within Mexico.
  • The landscape is characterized by a smaller number of process patents in this niche, offering opportunities for strategic licensing and manufacturing.
  • Careful analysis of overlapping patents, especially compound patents, remains essential for freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Expiration is foreseeable around 2030, after which generic manufacturing could be pursued without infringement risk.
  • Developing alternative manufacturing processes outside the scope of these claims can provide additional freedom of operation.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by MX2010013644?
The patent protects a specific process for manufacturing pharmaceutical compositions containing BET inhibitors, focusing on steps such as solvent use, temperature control, and purification techniques.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The core independent claims cover general process steps within a defined range, while dependent claims specify particular parameters, providing a balanced scope that balances protection and enforceability.

3. Does this patent cover active BET compounds?
No. The patent pertains to the manufacturing process, not the chemical compounds themselves, which are covered by separate compound patents.

4. How does the Mexican patent landscape influence the patent's enforceability?
Limited overlapping patents on process methods suggest strong enforceability; however, existing compound patents must be considered to assess infringement risks fully.

5. When does the patent expire, and what are the implications?
Expiration is expected around 2030, opening opportunities for generics and licensing deals in Mexico thereafter.


Sources:
[1] Patent and literature databases citing BET inhibitors and related manufacturing processes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.