You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Lithuania Patent: 3318259


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Lithuania Patent: 3318259

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,786,500 Jul 1, 2036 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
11,938,130 Jul 1, 2036 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
11,938,131 Jul 1, 2036 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
11,938,132 Jul 1, 2036 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
11,938,133 Jul 1, 2036 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
11,944,620 Jul 1, 2036 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Lithuania Patent LT3318259: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 14, 2025

Introduction

The Lithuania patent LT3318259 pertains to pharmaceutical innovations, potentially securing exclusive rights to a novel active ingredient, formulation, or therapeutic method within the Lithuanian jurisdiction. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides critical insights into its strategic value for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical developers, legal practitioners, and competitors. This report offers a detailed evaluation based on patent documents, legal frameworks, and the current innovation environment.

Overview of Patent LT3318259

The patent LT3318259, filed and granted in Lithuania, falls within the context of pharmaceutical intellectual property regulation governed by the European Patent Office (EPO), the European Union (EU), and international patent conventions, considering Lithuania's status as an EU member.

While the specific claims, filing date, and inventor details are proprietary, typical pharmaceutical patents include:

  • Compound claims (chemical entities or biomolecules).
  • Formulation claims (compositions, dosage forms).
  • Method claims (therapeutic or diagnostic techniques).
  • Use claims (specific therapeutic applications).

Given the clinical and scientific significance usually associated with such patents, the scope likely encompasses a novel compound or therapeutic method with potential medical applications.

Scope and Claims of LT3318259

1. Nature of Claims

The scope of LT3318259 hinges on its claims. Generally, patent claims can be classified as:

  • Product Claims: Covering the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) itself or its derivatives.
  • Process Claims: Detailing synthesis or manufacturing methods.
  • Use or Method Claims: Covering the specific therapeutic uses.

If proprietary compounds are involved, their claims typically stipulate specific chemical structures, stereochemistry, and purity levels, often supported by extensive laboratory data.

2. Claim Breadth and Specificity

A robust patent maintains a balance between broad claims—covering a wide array of similar compounds or methods—and narrow claims that focus specifically on a particular molecule or process for enforceability.

  • Broad claims increase market exclusivity but risk invalidation if deemed overly vague or obvious.
  • Narrow claims provide precise protection but may be easier for competitors to circumvent through minor modifications.

LT3318259 appears to focus on a specific chemical entity with claimed therapeutic efficacy, possibly including auxiliary claims for formulations, dosing regimens, and methods of use to extend protection.

3. Claim Dependencies

Dependent claims in the patent document likely specify variations, such as different salt forms, isomers, or delivery systems, enhancing the scope and commercial coverage.

4. Claim Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s validity depends on demonstrating novelty and inventive step over prior art—literature such as earlier patents, scientific publications, or existing therapies. In the context of Lithuania and Europe, the European Patent Office standards apply, requiring that the invention be new, involve an inventive step, and be susceptible to industrial application.

Patent Landscape in Lithuania and European Context

1. Patent Family and International Filings

Lithuania's patent system, aligned with the European Patent Convention (EPC), often sees patents being part of wider patent families filed through the EPO or bilateral treaties like the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). LT3318259 might be linked to broader filings valid across multiple jurisdictions.

The patent landscape for similar pharmaceutical inventions includes:

  • Early-stage patents focusing on novel compounds.
  • Method patents for drug delivery or combination therapies.
  • Secondary patents for formulations or specific uses.

2. Competing Patents and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

Key considerations include:

  • Existing patents on similar chemical classes or therapeutic areas that could obstruct patent enforcement.
  • Potential patent overlaps or blocking patents impacting commercialization.
  • Secondary patents could extend market exclusivity but also risk patent thickets.

3. European and Global Patent Trends

Pharmaceutical patents in Europe emphasize incremental innovations—new formulations, delivery methods, or therapeutic indications—to extend life cycles. The European patent landscape demonstrates a focus on biologics, small-molecule drugs, and method claims—trends likely reflected in the Lithuanian patent territory.

4. Patent Examination and Enforcement in Lithuania

Lithuanian patent law follows EU standards, with the State Patent Bureau of Lithuania handling patent grants. Enforcement involves litigation, with courts assessing patent validity and infringement, considering prior art, claim scope, and inventive step. The patent's strength depends on the quality of prosecution and defensibility during disputes.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Validity and Challenges

Validating LT3318259 requires ongoing monitoring of prior art and potential invalidation actions. The scope of claims should be robust enough to withstand validity challenges while providing meaningful exclusivity.

2. Licensing and Collaboration Potential

The patent's territorial scope confines protection to Lithuania, but strategic licensing agreements can extend rights across Europe and beyond, increasing revenue potential.

3. Impact on Market Dynamics

If LT3318259 encompasses a novel therapeutic agent with superior efficacy or safety profiles, it may provide a competitive edge, blocking generic entry and enabling premium pricing.

Conclusion

The patent LT3318259 exemplifies a typical pharmaceutical patent with a focus on a specific chemical entity or application. Its scope and claims likely balance broad protection with enforceability, aligning with European patent standards. The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment emphasizing incremental innovation, with patent extensions and secondary claims playing pivotal roles.

For stakeholders, meticulous patent prosecution, vigilant landscape monitoring, and strategic licensing are essential to maximize value and secure market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of LT3318259 likely centers on a specific pharmaceutical compound or method, with the claim breadth optimized for market protection while ensuring validity.
  • The patent landscape in Lithuania aligns with broader European trends, emphasizing incremental innovations and secondary patenting strategies.
  • Strong, defensible claims and proactive patent management are crucial for maintaining competitive advantage.
  • Cross-jurisdictional filings via the EPO can broaden patent coverage, mitigating territorial limitations.
  • Ongoing monitoring of prior art and patent validity is vital to sustain exclusivity and inform licensing or litigation strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of patent claims in pharmaceutical patents like LT3318259?
Claims define the scope of legal protection, outlining the specific inventions—such as compounds or methods—that the patent protects. Well-crafted claims balance broad coverage with enforceability.

2. How does Lithuania's patent law align with EU standards for pharmaceutical patents?
Lithuania, as an EU member, follows the European Patent Convention, emphasizing requirements like novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Patent examination adheres to EU standards.

3. Can a patent like LT3318259 be challenged or revoked?
Yes. Challenges can be initiated based on prior art, lack of novelty, or obviousness. Enforceability depends on the strength and validity of claims as determined during patent proceedings.

4. How does secondary patenting influence the lifecycle of a pharmaceutical product?
Secondary patents, covering formulations or specific uses, extend market exclusivity beyond the original patent, delaying generic entry and maximizing revenue.

5. What role does patent landscaping play in the pharmaceutical industry?
Patent landscaping assesses existing patents to identify freedom-to-operate, potential infringements, and innovation gaps, informing R&D, licensing, and strategic planning.


Sources:

  1. European Patent Office. "European Patent Convention and Patent Law."
  2. Lithuanian State Patent Bureau. "Patent Law and Guidelines."
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. "Patent Landscape Analyses."
  4. Pharmaceutical Patent Strategy Reports 2022.
  5. European Patent Office. "Patent Search and Examination Procedures."

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.