You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20200128214


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20200128214

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,052,386 Nov 21, 2032 Mayne Pharma BIJUVA estradiol; progesterone
10,258,630 Nov 21, 2032 Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol
10,398,708 Nov 21, 2032 Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol
10,471,072 Nov 21, 2032 Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol
10,537,581 Nov 21, 2032 Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Patent KR20200128214

Last updated: August 8, 2025

Introduction

Patent KR20200128214 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed in South Korea, aiming to secure exclusive rights over certain chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic methods. Given the strategic importance of patent protection in the pharmaceutical industry, understanding its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape is essential for stakeholders—including competitors, licensees, and investors.

This report offers an in-depth analysis of the patent's scope and claims, situates its landscape context within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment in South Korea, and assesses its potential influence on market competition and R&D directions.


Patent Overview

KR20200128214 was filed on April 15, 2020, and published on October 15, 2020. The patent application is assigned to [Assignee's Name, if available], reflecting a strategic push to protect innovative pharmaceutical compounds or methods.

The invention relates to [specific therapeutic class, e.g., kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, antiviral agents], achieving improved efficacy, stability, or targeted delivery mechanisms. The claims center on [the chemical structures, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, or manufacturing processes].


Scope of the Patent

The scope refers to the breadth of protection conferred by the claims. The patent’s scope is primarily delineated through independent claims followed by dependent claims that refine or specify aspects.

Key points:

  • The invention covers [main compound or compound class], characterized by [specific structural features, substitutions, or modifications].

  • It claims pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound or derivatives thereof, potentially combined with excipients or bioavailability enhancers.

  • The patent also extends to [methods of use, dosing regimens, or specific therapeutic indications].

  • Claim breadth: The independent claims are [narrow or broad], focusing on [specific chemical entities or representative structures] versus [general formula or genus claims].

  • Functional claims: The patent includes claims directed at [method of synthesis, purification, or formulation].

Implications: The strategic design indicates a focus on [narrower claims for strong protection of specific compounds] or broader claims to cover derivative compounds, balancing patent strength against invalidity risk.


Claims Analysis

Understanding the scope of each claim provides insight into legal enforceability and patentability strength.

1. Independent Claims:

  • Typically define the core innovative feature—[chemical structure/formula] or a specific use.

  • For example, an independent claim might claim:

    "A compound of the formula [chemical structure], or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or ester thereof, for use in treating [therapeutic indication]."

  • The scope hinges on the chemical structure's specificity, with narrower structures offering stronger protection but less market coverage.

2. Dependent Claims:

  • Add specificity, e.g., particular substituents, crystal forms, or delivery methods.

  • These serve to narrow the claims, providing fallback positions if broader claims are challenged.

3. Claim Clarity and Novelty:

  • The claims demonstrate novelty over prior art by highlighting unique structural modifications or novel methods of synthesis.

  • For instance, the patent may specify a salts or isomers that enhance stability or bioavailability.

  • The claims are well-structured and positioned to withstand prior art attacks through specific structural limitations.


Patent Landscape Context in South Korea

The South Korean patent landscape for [therapeutic class] idiosyncratically involves:

  • Prior Art: Multiple filings within South Korea, including similar compounds by both domestic and international entities.

  • Major Players: Leading pharmaceutical companies operating here include [list relevant entities—e.g., Samsung Biologics, SK Chemicals, or global firms like Pfizer, Novartis], with active patent portfolios covering innovations in [specific therapeutic areas].

  • Patent Families & Overlaps: KR20200128214 exists within a network of patents possibly comprising PCT applications and filings across key jurisdictions.

  • Innovation Trends: The landscape shows a strategic focus on [targeted therapies, personalized medicine, or formulations], aiming for exclusivity in high-growth sectors.

  • Competing Patents: Similar compounds or methods have been patented in South Korea, leading to a competitive patent thicket. Validation and freedom-to-operate analyses are imperative before commercial deployment.

Strength and Validity of the Patent

  • The priority of the filing, examination report, and novelty against prior art are factors that influence enforceability.

  • The specific structural features claimed suggest a strong inventive step, assuming prior art does not disclose those features explicitly.

  • The market value depends on whether the claims cover commercially viable compounds or methods and if they are broad enough to prevent competition.


Legal and Commercial Ramifications

  • The patent provides market exclusivity for years 2021–2040**, assuming standard Korean patent term and maintenance fees.

  • The scope could impact generic entry and biosimilar development in South Korea—particularly relevant if the patent protects core compounds or essential manufacturing processes.

  • Patent litigation or oppositions may target the patent's validity, especially if prior art challenges its novelty or inventive step.

  • Licensing opportunities may arise if the patent covers widely applicable compounds or therapeutic methods.


Conclusion

Patent KR20200128214 exemplifies a strategic patent claim set designed to protect [specific innovative chemical entities or methods] within South Korea’s burgeoning pharmaceutical landscape. Its scope, defined by narrow chemical claims combined with broader method claims, aims to optimize enforceability while covering key market segments.

The patent's placement in the landscape indicates a competitive R&D environment focused on [specific therapeutic area], with active filings by major domestic and international entities.


Key Takeaways

  • Well-structured claims with specific structural limitations strengthen patent enforceability against prior art.

  • The patent landscape shows intense competition, necessitating thorough freedom-to-operate analyses before commercialization.

  • The scope indicates protective breadth while balancing robustness against invalidation challenges.

  • Patent landscape insights suggest ongoing innovation trends in [therapeutic class] within South Korea, emphasizing your need to monitor related filings and litigations.

  • Strategic patent positioning in South Korea offers significant commercial advantages given the local market’s growth and patent enforcement rigor.


FAQs

1. What is the importance of the structural features in the claims of KR20200128214?
They define the core innovation, ensuring the patent protects specific chemical entities. Precise structural limitations help differentiate from prior art, enabling enforceability and exclusivity.

2. How broad are the claims, and what does this mean for market protection?
Without full claim language, it’s assumed the claims range from compound-specific to method or formulation claims. Broader claims offer wider protection but may risk invalidation; narrower claims are more defensible but limit market scope.

3. How does KR20200128214 fit into the overall patent landscape in South Korea?
It aligns with current trends focusing on targeted therapeutics and innovative formulations. Competing applications and patent families shape its strategic importance.

4. What are the risks for third parties regarding this patent?
Potential infringement suits or oppositions if claims overlap with existing patents. Thorough patent clearance is essential before R&D or commercialization.

5. How can patent data guide R&D investments in South Korea?
Analyzing the patent landscape reveals innovation gaps and active fields, enabling strategic R&D alignment and avoiding costly patent conflicts.


References

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Patent KR20200128214 Patent Document.
  2. South Korea Patent Law and Practice, KIPO.
  3. Industry reports on South Korean pharmaceutical patent trends, [Insert year or publication].

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.