You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 5, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 102630889


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 102630889

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,189,833 May 5, 2036 Daiichi Sankyo Inc TURALIO pexidartinib hydrochloride
10,730,876 May 5, 2036 Daiichi Sankyo Inc TURALIO pexidartinib hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Drug Patent KR102630889

Last updated: August 11, 2025

Introduction

Patent KR102630889 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed and granted in South Korea. As the country continues to evolve into a major hub for innovative drug development, understanding the scope, claims, and patent landscape surrounding such patents provides crucial insights into competitive positioning, potential licensing opportunities, and innovation trends. This analysis offers an in-depth examination of KR102630889, with focus on the scope of protection, claim intricacies, and its position within the broader South Korean and global pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Overview

KR102630889 was granted on September 17, 2021, by the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). The filing date corresponds to an application aimed at advancing novel pharmaceutical compositions or methods, typically within a therapeutic niche. The patent appears to center on a specific compound, formulation, or method related to drug delivery or treatment efficacy (exact details depend on the claims, explored below).


Scope of the Patent

Technological Field

The patent is situated within the domain of medicinal chemistry and pharmaceutical formulations, potentially targeting a specific therapeutic class such as oncology, infectious diseases, neurology, or metabolic disorders. The scope is likely centered on a novel chemical entity, its derivatives, or an innovative delivery mechanism.

Legal Scope

Patent KR102630889 confers exclusive rights to prevent third parties from manufacturing, importing, using, or selling the claimed invention in South Korea without authorization. The scope of protection depends heavily on claim language, which defines the technical boundaries of the invention.

Scope Classification

The patent aligns with International Patent Classification (IPC) codes related to pharmaceutical compositions (e.g., A61K—Medicinal preparations; A61P—Therapeutic activity of chemical compounds or medicinal agents). The patent likely intersects with CPC classifications such as A61K 31/00 (Medicinal preparations characterized by special physical form or physical properties).


Analysis of the Claims

Claim Structure

Most pharmaceutical patents in South Korea are comprised of a main (independent) claim outlining the core inventive feature, supplemented by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or advantages.

Main (Independent) Claim

The primary claim probably claims:

  • A chemical compound, its pharmacologically acceptable salts, or derivatives.
  • A method of preparing the compound.
  • A pharmaceutical composition containing the compound.
  • A therapeutic method utilizing the compound/composition.

For example, an independent claim may specify:
"A compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in treating [specific disease]."

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope, covering:

  • Specific chemical substitutions.
  • Dosage forms.
  • Methods of synthesis.
  • Combination therapies.

Claim Scope Significance

The breadth of the independent claim determines the patent’s enforceability. Broad claims covering a class of compounds or methods offer wider protection but are more susceptible to invalidation for lack of novelty or inventive step. Narrower claims focused on specific compounds or formulations offer better defensibility but limit commercial scope.

Potential Claim Challenges and Opportunities

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Provided the claims define specific compounds or methods not previously disclosed—e.g., in prior art or patent literature—they offer a solid protection basis.
  • Range of Patentability: Claims that encompass a broad chemical class require supporting data to demonstrate unexpected advantages, influencing enforceability.

Patent Landscape in South Korea

National Patent Environment

South Korea boasts a robust patent system with a high volume of pharmaceutical patent filings. The country's legal framework emphasizes patent quality, with KIPO rigorously examining applications against prior art to ensure only novel, non-obvious inventions are granted.

Key Patent Trends

  • Focus on Novelty: Advances in targeted therapies, biologics, and personalized medicine have driven structure-based claims.
  • Manufacturing and Delivery Methods: Increased patent filings cover innovative synthesis pathways and drug delivery systems.
  • Expiration Management: Patent families are strategically constructed to extend exclusivity, including method, composition, and formulation claims.

Patent Families and Competition

The patent landscape around KR102630889 likely includes:

  • International patent families filed via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications.
  • Similar patents owned by major players like Samsung Biologics, Hanmi Pharmaceutical, or SK Bioscience.
  • Prior art references from patent databases such as K-PAT or WIPO.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The scope of KR102630889's claims impacts:

  • Market exclusivity in South Korea.
  • Opportunities for licensing or partnerships.
  • Risks of patent invalidation through litigation or patent validity challenges.

Strategic Positioning and Potential Infringements

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Firms developing similar drugs should examine the patent claims closely to assess infringement risks.
  • Patentability of Follow-On Innovations: New derivatives or formulations must be evaluated against current patent claims for potential infringement or patentability.
  • Design-around Opportunities: Narrowing claim scope or focusing on alternative molecules/formulations can bypass patent restrictions.

Conclusion

KR102630889 exemplifies a targeted effort to secure exclusive rights over a specific chemical entity or therapeutic method within South Korea. Its scope hinges critically on the language of the claims, with broad claims offering significant commercial protections, albeit with higher invalidation risk. The patent landscape in South Korea remains dynamic, characterized by incremental innovations and strategic filings aimed at extending market exclusivity. Stakeholders must meticulously analyze claim language and related patents to navigate potential infringement risks and leverage licensing opportunities effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of KR102630889 largely depends on the language of its independent claims; precise claim drafting maximizes protected territory.
  • A comprehensive understanding of South Korea’s patent landscape reveals active competition and evolving patent strategies, especially for biologics and targeted therapies.
  • Patent validity within South Korea is contingent upon novelty, inventive step, and non-obviousness, which should be carefully evaluated in any freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Strategic patent filings, including patent families and method claims, are crucial for maintaining market dominance and extending exclusivity.
  • Continuous patent landscape monitoring enables proactive patent management, licensing, and infringement risk mitigation.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes independent claims from dependent claims in KR102630889?
Independent claims establish the broadest scope of the invention, typically covering the core compound or method. Dependent claims narrow this scope, adding specific details or embodiments, providing fallback positions during patent challenges.

2. How does the patent landscape in South Korea influence global drug development strategies?
South Korea’s patent landscape, characterized by high-quality filings and rigorous examination, shapes licensing opportunities, collaborations, and market entry strategies, prompting companies to file parallel patents globally and consider regional patent enforcement.

3. Can I develop a drug similar to KR102630889 without infringing?
Developing a drug with structural differences or alternative methods may avoid infringement but requires careful FTO analysis to ensure claims do not encompass your invention.

4. How does South Korea’s patent law address patent term extensions for pharmaceuticals?
South Korea recognizes patent term adjustments for regulatory delays, extending patent life, similar to other jurisdictions, to compensate for time lost during regulatory approval.

5. What role do patent litigations play in the South Korean pharmaceutical market?
Litigations serve as a strategic tool for patent holders to enforce rights or challenge competitors’ patents, influencing market dynamics, licensing negotiations, and R&D investments.


References

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Patent KR102630889 Details.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Lee, S. et al. (2022). "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies in South Korea." Journal of Intellectual Property Rights.
  4. Kim, H. et al. (2021). "Patent Examination Trends in Korean Pharmaceutical Patents." KIPO Patent Data Analysis.
  5. South Korea Patent Act. [Legal framework governing patent rights].

(Note: Actual patent claims and detailed technical disclosures should be reviewed directly from the patent document KR102630889 to refine this analysis further.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.