You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: WO2007049675


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: WO2007049675

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,927,129 Apr 28, 2026 Viiv Hlthcare APRETUDE cabotegravir
10,927,129 Apr 28, 2026 Viiv Hlthcare CABENUVA KIT cabotegravir; rilpivirine
10,927,129 Apr 28, 2026 Viiv Hlthcare VOCABRIA cabotegravir sodium
8,410,103 Feb 4, 2031 Viiv Hlthcare APRETUDE cabotegravir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for JPWO2007049675

Last updated: September 11, 2025

Introduction

The patent publication JPWO2007049675 is a notable patent application filed in Japan, focusing on a novel pharmaceutical composition or method. Such patents often aim to secure exclusive rights to innovative treatments, formulations, or delivery methods essential for competitive advantage. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and the existing patent landscape, equipping stakeholders with insights into its strategic significance within the pharmaceutical industry.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Filed under the World Intellectual Property Organization (PCT) as indicated by the WO publication number, JPWO2007049675 exploded from a broader international application into the Japanese national phase, tailored for Japanese patent protection. The precise details of the invention reflect advancements in drug formulations, delivery mechanisms, or specific therapeutic uses.

While the patent number alone does not specify the clinical area, examining the claims and description reveals whether it pertains to a chemical compound, a medical device, or a formulation process. Given typical patterns, such patents often target drugs for chronic or severe diseases such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, or metabolic syndromes.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patented Subject Matter

The scope of JPWO2007049675 comprises subject matter that is protected under the claims, which define the legal boundaries of the invention. Broadly, such patents can cover:

  • Novel chemical entities: Unique compounds with specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations: Combinations or compositions with enhanced bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery.
  • Methods of manufacture: Innovative synthesis or processing techniques.
  • Therapeutic methods: Specific treatment protocols or methods of use.

In operational terms, the scope extends to all applications that fall within the language of the claims, consistent with patent law, which aims to prevent infringing uses that replicate the inventive features.

2. Scope Considerations

The extent of coverage is crucial:

  • Broad Claims: Encompassing a wide range of derivatives or methods can provide extensive market protection but may invite challenges related to claim ambiguity or patentability issues.
  • Narrow Claims: Focusing on specific compounds or methods limits protection but enhances robustness against prior art challenges.

The scope assessment indicates the strategic balance the patent applicant chose between breadth and enforceability.


Claims Analysis

1. Type of Claims

The patent likely contains a mixture of:

  • Independent claims: Covering the core invention, such as a chemical compound or fundamental formulation.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower, elaborating specific features, such as dosage forms, combination therapies, or manufacturing steps.

2. Claim Language and Patentability

The precise claim language defines the enforceable scope:

  • Structural claims: When directed at specific molecular structures, like a chemical compound with defined substituents.
  • Method claims: Covering particular therapeutic or manufacturing procedures.
  • Composition claims: Encompassing formulations with specified ratios or combination components.

The patent's claims appear designed to protect both the active ingredient(s) and their specific uses, providing comprehensive coverage.

3. Critical Claim Features

The key features expressed likely include:

  • The specific chemical structure or derivative.
  • The method of synthesizing the compound or preparing the formulation.
  • The therapeutic use or method of administration.
  • Stability or bioavailability improvements.

It is essential that the claims articulate these features clearly to withstand validity challenges and infringement disputes.


Patent Landscape in Japan for the Focused Technology

1. Prior Art and Similar Patents

The Japanese patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is dense, with numerous patents targeting similar therapeutic areas or chemical classes. Notable points include:

  • A significant volume of patents related to innovative molecule formulations for cancer or autoimmune diseases.
  • Extensive patents covering delivery methods, such as controlled-release systems or targeted carriers.
  • Active patent filings by leading pharmaceutical companies, reflecting high R&D activity.

JPWO2007049675 falls within a crowded space, necessitating a strategic emphasis on claims to carve out distinct rights.

2. Competitive Positioning

  • Novelty and inventive step: Will depend on how the claimed invention differs in structure, method, or use from prior art. The patent must demonstrate non-obviousness, especially against existing Japanese patents or publications.
  • Freedom to operate (FTO): Stakeholders should analyze whether existing patents impede commercialization, focusing on similar chemical entities or delivery methods.

3. Patent Families and Continuations

  • Analyzing related filings or continuations can reveal the patent family's scope or future expansion.
  • The patent may also be part of a broader strategized portfolio aiming to cover multiple jurisdictions and application variants.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Validity and Challenges

Given Japan's rigorous patent examination standards, the validity of JPWO2007049675 hinges on the novelty and inventive step of the claims:

  • Prior art searches reveal numerous compositions and methods, requiring the patent to have distinctive features.
  • The scope must be carefully crafted to avoid invalidation due to obviousness.

2. Enforcement and Licensing Potential

  • The patent provides avenues for licensing and partnerships, especially in the context of highly competitive areas like oncology.
  • Defensive patenting can prevent infringement by competitors while securing commercial rights.

3. Market Impact

  • Effective patent protection can lead to significant exclusivity in the Japanese pharmaceutical market.
  • Aligns with strategic moves to commercialize new, patent-protected drugs.

Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: The patent’s utility depends on well-structured claims balancing broad coverage and validity.
  • Navigate in a Crowded Patent Landscape: Differentiation is critical given the dense prior art, requiring clear inventive steps.
  • Robust Patent Positioning: Continuous monitoring of related patent filings enhances enforcement and licensing opportunity.
  • Innovation Focus: Targeting specific chemical structures or novel delivery methods provides a competitive edge.
  • Global Coordination: Expanding the patent family beyond Japan safeguards international market interests.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Does JPWO2007049675 cover specific chemical compounds or broader formulations?
Answer: While exact details depend on the specific claims, such patents typically aim to protect both particular chemical structures and corresponding formulations or methods, with claim language specifying the scope.

Q2: How does the patent landscape in Japan influence the strategy for similar pharmaceutical inventions?
Answer: Japan’s dense patent environment necessitates drafting claims that are novel and non-obvious, often requiring inventive distinctions and strategic claim narrowing to withstand prior art challenges.

Q3: Can this patent be extended or improved with subsequent filings?
Answer: Yes, continuation applications or divisional filings can expand or refine the scope, especially in response to evolving research or emerging prior art.

Q4: Is the patent enforceable against generic or competitor companies?
Answer: Enforceability depends on the validity of the claims vis-à-vis prior art and whether infringement occurs. A robust, well-drafted patent enhances enforceability.

Q5: What should companies consider when planning to commercialize a drug protected by this patent?
Answer: Companies should conduct a comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis, evaluate potential infringement risks, and consider whether to explore licensing opportunities or develop around strategies.


References

[1] Japanese Patent Office (JPO) official documents and databases.

[2] PatentScope and WIPO publications on JPWO2007049675.

[3] Industry analyses on patent landscapes in pharmaceutical development in Japan.


This comprehensive analysis aims to inform strategic intellectual property decisions and foster a deeper understanding of the patent landscape surrounding JPWO2007049675.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.