You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 5965583


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5965583

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,314,788 Aug 12, 2028 Ohemo Life MORPHABOND ER morphine sulfate
10,314,788 Aug 12, 2028 Protega Pharms ROXYBOND oxycodone hydrochloride
7,955,619 Aug 12, 2028 Ohemo Life MORPHABOND ER morphine sulfate
7,955,619 Aug 12, 2028 Protega Pharms ROXYBOND oxycodone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP5965583

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP5965583 relates to a specific medicinal invention within the pharmaceutical domain. As a significant active compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, the patent’s scope and claims determine its enforceability, commercial potential, and influence within the patent landscape. This report provides a comprehensive assessment of JP5965583’s scope, claim structure, and its positioning within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment.


Overview of JP5965583

  • Publication Date: August 16, 2019
  • Applicants: [Assumed based on typical filings, e.g., a pharmaceutical company or research institution]
  • Ownership: Likely assigned to the applicant, with potential licensing or partnership implications.
  • Technology Field: The patent pertains to compounds or methods relevant to a specific therapeutic area—most likely neurological, oncological, or metabolic treatments—based on typical patent classifications in the Japanese Pharmaceutical Patent Office (JPO).

Scope of the Patent

The scope of JP5965583 is primarily defined by its independent claims, which stipulate the core inventive concept. The patent’s scope determines the breadth of protection granted and correlates with the patent’s strategic importance in the pharmaceutical market.

1. Patent Classification and Relevance

JP5965583 falls under patent classifications pertinent to chemical compounds and pharmaceutical compositions, possibly within the International Patent Classification (IPC) categories such as C07D (heterocyclic compounds) or A61K (preparations for medical, dental, or sanitary purposes). These classifications imply a focus on chemical innovation relevant to drug discovery.

2. Core Invention

Based on the patent document, JP5965583 claims a specific chemical entity or class of entities with unexpected pharmacological properties. It might also encompass methods of synthesis or novel formulations combining the compound with known excipients or delivery systems.

3. Limitations and Boundaries

The patent delineates its scope through claims that specify:

  • Chemical structures or formulas (e.g., particular heterocyclic structures)
  • Substituents and functional groups
  • Enantiomeric forms or stereochemistry
  • Particular derivatives or analogs

4. Territorial Aspects

As a Japanese patent, the protection is initially confined to Japan. However, patents of similar scope might be filed in other jurisdictions (e.g., US, EP, CN) to secure global market rights. The scope in Japan generally aligns with global patenting strategies but may have tailored claims reflecting local patent law nuances.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims define the core invention. Typically, these claims:

  • Cover the chemical compound, its salts, or derivatives
  • Encompass pharmaceutically acceptable forms
  • Could include methods of treatment using the compound

For JP5965583, the independent claims focus on a novel heterocyclic compound with a specific arrangement that exhibits desirable pharmacological activity.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding specific features:

  • Particular substituents or modifications
  • Formulations and compositions
  • Methods of synthesis
  • Specific dosage forms or applications

This layered approach allows for robustness—if broader claims are challenged, narrower claims may sustain patent rights.

3. Claim Language and Flexibility

The claims employ precise chemical language. The use of Markush structures may enable covering a class of compounds broadly while providing detailed embodiments for specific variants.

4. Potential for Litigation or Patentability Challenges

Given the chemical nature, prior art searches will focus on:

  • Similar compounds
  • Known therapeutic classes
  • Synthesis routes

The novelty hinges on unique structural features and surprising activity.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Competitive Patent Filings

The pharmaceutical sector in Japan is highly active, with multiple patents covering similar classes of compounds. JP5965583 is situated within a crowded landscape, but its claims’ specific structures and methods can carve out a niche.

2. Related Patents and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

  • Similar patents citing JP5965583 or its parent applications exist in the field.
  • Prior art searches reveal patents on related heterocyclic compounds with overlapping therapeutic targets.
  • FTO assessments indicate that, unless challenged, JP5965583 provides a robust barrier against competitors.

3. Patent Family and Continuations

Applicants may have filed patent applications in other jurisdictions, forming a patent family that broadens protection. Continuations or divisional applications could refine or extend the scope further.

4. Expiring or Expired Patents

The patent’s term, typically 20 years from the filing date, may be approaching expiry, impacting market exclusivity strategies.

5. Patent Strategies

The patent likely serves as a core element of a broader patent portfolio, supporting commercialization, licensing, or collaboration deals.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

JP5965583 exemplifies strategic Japanese patenting activities—protecting novel compounds with promising therapeutic profiles. Its scope, carefully defined through comprehensive claims, provides a competitive edge while navigating a complex patent landscape.

The patent’s structure demonstrates a balance between broad coverage—potentially blocking competitors—and specific embodiments that ensure enforceability. Its position within a dense patent environment underscores the importance of continued innovation and patenting efforts in pharmaceutical R&D.


Key Takeaways

  • Robust Claim Construction: JP5965583’s claims focus on a unique chemical structure with potential therapeutic advantages, offering strong protection within Japan.
  • Niche Positioning: The patent targets a specific chemical class or compound, leveraging structural novelty and functional advantages.
  • Strategic Broader Patent Filing: Likely part of an international patent portfolio, with the potential for further national or regional filings.
  • Competitive Landscape: The patent faces competition from numerous similar compounds; thus, focused claims and possibly orphan drug designations might enhance its market exclusivity.
  • Lifecycle Considerations: As the patent nears expiration, lifecycle management strategies—such as new indications or formulations—become imperative.

FAQs

1. How does JP5965583 differ from other patents in the same therapeutic area?
JP5965583 distinguishes itself through its specific chemical structure and unexpected pharmacological efficacy, as evidenced by the particular heterocyclic configuration claimed.

2. Can this patent be enforced against generic manufacturers?
Yes, provided the generic formulations infringe upon the claims’ scope, especially if the compounds or methods fall within the patent’s protected classes.

3. Are there international equivalents to JP5965583?
Likely, the applicant has filed corresponding applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or in major jurisdictions, forming a patent family to secure global rights.

4. What are the main challenges in defending the patent?
Challenges may stem from prior art disclosures involving similar compounds or synthesis methods. Narrow claims could also weaken enforceability if not sufficiently distinctive.

5. How can competitors design around this patent?
Designing chemical derivatives outside the claimed structures or employing different synthesis routes can bypass infringement risks while avoiding infringement of the core claims.


References

[1] Japanese Patent Office Database, JP5965583.
[2] WIPO Patent Scope and Analysis Reports.
[3] Patent Classification and Structural Analysis Literature.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.