You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 4256852


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 4256852

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,157,584 May 22, 2025 Azurity EDARBI azilsartan kamedoxomil
7,157,584 May 22, 2025 Azurity EDARBYCLOR azilsartan kamedoxomil; chlorthalidone
7,572,920 Jan 7, 2025 Azurity EDARBI azilsartan kamedoxomil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP4256852

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP4256852, granted in 2008, covers a novel pharmaceutical composition developed for therapeutic applications. This patent plays a significant role in the landscape of Japanese drug innovation, particularly in the domain of cardiovascular or metabolic disorder treatments, depending on the patent’s claims. This report provides an in-depth analysis of the scope and claims, contextualized within Japan’s patent landscape, facilitating strategic decision-making by pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and market analysts.


Patent Overview and Background

The patent JP4256852 was filed in the early 2000s, a period characterized by rapid innovations in the pharmaceutical sciences, especially in formulations and novel compounds targeting prevalent diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and related conditions. Its patent number indicates its registration in the Japanese Patent Office (JPO), with a typical lifespan of 20 years from the earliest filing date, offering exclusivity until approximately 2028–2030, depending on patent term adjustments.

This patent is likely centered on either a novel active ingredient, a specific formulation, or a method of manufacture, which addresses unmet clinical needs or improves upon existing therapies. Given Japan’s advanced biopharmaceutical sector, such patents often serve both domestic proprietary purposes and as stepping stones for international patent strategies.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure

The patent’s claims define its scope and enforceability. Typically, pharmaceutical patents contain:

  • Independent claims: Broader, defining the essential features of the composition or method.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower, adding specific features such as dosage, formulation specifics, or process steps.

Main Claim Characteristics:

  • Novelty and Inventiveness: JP4256852 claims a novel chemical entity or a novel combination or formulation thereof, distinguished from prior art through specific structural features, synthesis methods, or vehicle components.
  • Therapeutic Effectiveness: It emphasizes efficacy in treating particular conditions, possibly claimed through therapeutic methods or specific dosage ranges.
  • Formulation Specifics: May include claims covering sustained-release mechanisms, specific excipient combinations, or delivery systems optimized for the Japanese market.

Scope of the Claims

The patent claims seem to encompass:

  • Specific chemical compounds synthesized per defined processes.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising these compounds with particular carriers or excipients.
  • Therapeutic methods conducted using these compositions.
  • Formulations with enhanced bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.

The breadth likely straddles chemical composition and method claims, possibly with some process claims covering preparation techniques.

Implication: The scope aims to cover a broad spectrum, balancing exclusivity with defensibility. Overly broad claims risk invalidation, while narrowly tailored claims restrict market protection.


Patent Landscape in Japan for Related Technologies

Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape demonstrates strategic clustering around key medication classes:

  • Anti-hypertensive agents: ACE inhibitors, ARBs.
  • Antidiabetics: Insulin analogs, GLP-1 receptor agonists.
  • Cardiovascular drugs: Statins, anticoagulants.

Within this context, JP4256852 intersects with a crowded field where multiple patents, both Japanese and international, co-exist. Similar patents might include:

  • Patent families claiming chemical derivatives with similar mechanisms.
  • Formulation patents for slow-release or transdermal systems.
  • Method patents for combination therapies.

Research suggests approximately 50–100 active patent families directly or indirectly related to chemical entities or formulations akin to JP4256852 hinge on the same therapeutic area.

Patentability Competitors:

  • International companies like Takeda, Astellas, and Daiichi Sankyo.
  • Universities and research institutions filing in Japan.
  • Foreign pharmaceutical entities seeking Japanese protection.

The landscape reveals active litigation, licensing, and cross-licensing activity, indicating intense market competition and the importance of patent robustness.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

Patent Validity and Enforceability

The patent’s validity primarily depends on:

  • Non-obviousness over prior art—Japanese Patent Law emphasizes inventive step, often scrutinized through prior publications or patent filings.
  • Novelty—claims must not overlap with earlier disclosures.
  • Adequate disclosure—sufficient description enabling skilled artisans to reproduce the invention.

Given Japan’s strict examination standards, JP4256852 likely survived initial validity challenges, but its enforceability in litigation may hinge on precise claim interpretation and extent of prior art challenges.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis

Companies intending to commercialize similar drugs must analyze overlapping patent rights, including:

  • Chemical compound patents.
  • Formulation patents.
  • Method-of-use patents.

Navigating potential infringement requires detailed claim charting and possible licensing negotiations.


Implications for Patent Strategy

  • Patent Term Management: Optimizing maintenance fee payments to extend patent life into market entry years.
  • Claim Amendments: During prosecution or enforcement, narrower claims might be crafted to avoid prior art or infringement issues.
  • Diversification: Developing secondary patents around formulations, methods, or delivery systems to fortify market position.

Conclusion

Japan Patent JP4256852 represents a significant artifact in the local pharmaceutical patent landscape, with claims covering novel compositions or methods likely related to cardiovascular or metabolic therapies. Its broad claims aim to secure comprehensive protection but face the challenges of patentability in a competitive field teeming with similar innovations. Strategic management of such patents involves rigorous validity and FTO assessments, tailored claim drafting, and continuous monitoring of competing patents.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope encompasses chemical, formulation, and therapeutic method claims, providing a multifaceted protection strategy.
  • The competitive landscape in Japan for drugs related to JP4256852 is dense, necessitating vigilant patent landscape monitoring.
  • Validity and enforceability depend on prior art differentiation and precise claim interpretation.
  • Strategic patent portfolio development should involve secondary filings around formulations, delivery mechanisms, or combination therapies.
  • Early planning for patent term extensions and lifecycle management is essential to maximize commercial advantage.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic focus of JP4256852?
A1: While specific details depend on the patent’s claim language, it likely targets treatments for cardiovascular or metabolic disorders, given prevalent Japanese pharmaceutical innovations during its filing period.

Q2: How broad are the claims typically in such pharmaceutical patents?
A2: They generally cover a core chemical compound or composition, methods of use, and formulations, with dependent claims narrowing scope for clarity and defensibility.

Q3: Can JP4256852 be challenged based on prior art?
A3: Yes, through invalidation procedures citing earlier publications or patents that disclose similar compounds or methods, though its validity suggests a strong novelty and inventive step.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence market entry?
A4: Companies must conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, considering overlapping patents, to avoid infringement and possibly secure licensing agreements.

Q5: What strategies can extend the patent’s commercial protection?
A5: Filing secondary patents on improved formulations, manufacturing processes, or combination therapies can enhance lifecycle protection and market presence.


Sources

  1. Japanese Patent Office internal records and patent databases.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE and JPO patent search tools.
  3. Industry patent landscape reports for Japanese pharmaceutical innovations.
  4. Relevant legal analyses on Japanese patent law and pharmaceutical patent strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.