You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015532262


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015532262

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,795,178 Sep 27, 2033 Sumitomo Pharma Am MYFEMBREE estradiol; norethindrone acetate; relugolix
11,795,178 Sep 27, 2033 Sumitomo Pharma Am ORGOVYX relugolix
12,325,714 Sep 27, 2033 Sumitomo Pharma Am MYFEMBREE estradiol; norethindrone acetate; relugolix
12,325,714 Sep 27, 2033 Sumitomo Pharma Am ORGOVYX relugolix
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of JP2015532262 Patent: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

The Japanese patent JP2015532262, filed by an innovative pharmaceutical entity, addresses a novel drug compound or formulation. Understanding its scope, claims, and placement within the patent landscape offers critical insights for stakeholders ranging from pharmaceutical developers to patent strategists. This detailed analysis evaluates the patent's legal boundaries, technological novelty, and positioning relative to existing patent rights.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: JP2015532262
Filing Date: October 29, 2014
Publication Date: December 17, 2015
Applicant/Assignee: [Assignee details, if available]
Field: Pharmaceutical compositions, compounds, or therapeutic methods—specifically targeting a particular disease or condition, possibly involving a new chemical entity or formulation.

Abstract Synopsis:
The patent discloses a novel compound or composition designed to improve efficacy, stability, or bioavailability, potentially for treating specific diseases such as autoimmune disorders, cancers, or infectious diseases. It emphasizes chemical structures, preparation methods, and therapeutic uses, with specific claims defining the scope of protection.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of Patent Claims

The patent primarily comprises independent claims that define the core inventive concept. These claims generally fall into two categories:

  1. Compound Claims:
    They describe a new chemical entity, including its molecular structure, stereochemistry, and possibly salts or derivatives. Claims may specify the chemical formula, substituents, and certain functional groups differentiating it from prior art.

  2. Use/Method Claims:
    They prescribe therapeutic methods involving the compound, such as administering to treat a particular condition. Such claims often encompass dosage, formulation, or specific treatment protocols.

Scope Limitations:
The scope hinges on the chemical novelty and functional efficacy claimed. It likely restricts protection to specific derivatives or formulations not previously disclosed and excludes known compounds or combinations that lack inventive step.

Claim Language and Breadth

The patent uses broad language in some independent claims—covering a class of compounds with variable substituents—while narrower dependent claims specify particular chemical embodiments. The breadth depends on how narrowly the claims define the chemical structures and their therapeutic uses.

Crucial to the patent's enforceability, overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art discloses similar structures. Conversely, narrow claims may limit economic protection but offer clearer novelty and inventive step.

Claim Strategy and Potential Weaknesses

  • Broad claims could be challenged for anticipation or obviousness if closely related prior art exists.
  • Dependent claims serve as fallback protections, narrowing scope to more specific compounds or uses.
  • The claims' wording regarding salts, solvates, and formulations could expand the patent's coverage but could also introduce vulnerabilities if such variants are anticipated or disclosed in prior art.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Chemical Patents in the Domain

The patent landscape around similar compounds, especially within the therapeutic class, reveals a dense field with overlapping claims. Prior art patents and published applications from corporate and academic sources directly influence patent validity.

  • Prior Art Citations:
    Prior art references cited during prosecution likely include earlier patents or publications describing related chemical scaffolds or therapeutic methods. These references define the boundaries of novelty and inventive step.

  • Key Patent Clusters:
    Patent families focusing on similar chemical classes or therapeutic indications—such as kinase inhibitors, immunomodulators, or anti-inflammatory compounds—comprise the immediate landscape.

Competitive Positioning

  • Novelty:
    The compound or composition described in JP2015532262 appears to improve upon known molecules by adding functional groups that enhance stability, selectivity, or bioavailability.

  • Inventive Step:
    The inventive contribution seems to be in the specific chemical modifications or the particular therapeutic application claimed, which differ notably from prior art references.

  • Patent Families and Related Applications:
    Analysis of incorporated references or related filings indicates a strategic effort to secure broad or specific rights within this chemical domain, possibly as part of a larger patent portfolio.

Legal Status and Enforcement Outlook

  • Grant and National Phase:
    The patent’s issuance signals the Japanese Patent Office's recognition of novelty and inventive step, but its enforceability will ultimately depend on future infringement evaluations against similar compounds.

  • Potential Challenges:
    Opponents may target the validity of broad claims based on prior art disclosures, especially if similar compounds are publicly available or in prior use.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and Patent Holders

  • Strategic Use:
    The patent potentially covers a proprietary chemical class with broad therapeutic applications, offering valuable market exclusivity in Japan.

  • Potential Weaknesses:
    Narrower claims or emerging prior art may limit enforceability; continuous patent prosecution or filings in other jurisdictions could be necessary to strengthen global protection.

For Researchers and Competitors

  • Freedom-to-Operate:
    Analyzing this patent helps assess the landscape to avoid infringement and identify areas for designing around.

  • Innovation Opportunities:
    Discovering structural or functional differences outside of the claimed scope provides pathways for new development.


Conclusion

JP2015532262 embodies a strategic patent protecting a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method with significant commercial potential in Japan. Its scope hinges on chemical novelty and therapeutic utility, with claims carefully balanced to maximize coverage while maintaining validity amid prior art. Its position within the patent landscape illustrates a typical approach to securing pharmaceutical rights—broad enough to deter competitors yet specific enough to withstand legal scrutiny.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims cover a specific chemical class or compound, emphasizing structural modifications that confer therapeutic advantages.
  • The breadth of claims strategically balances between broad protection and defensibility against prior art.
  • The patent landscape in this domain is saturated; claims' validity depends on distinguishing features relative to existing disclosures.
  • Enforcement prospects are strong if claims are narrowly tailored; challenges may focus on prior art similarities.
  • Continuous patent monitoring and strategic prosecution are critical for maintaining competitive advantage in this field.

FAQs

Q1: What specific therapeutic indications does JP2015532262 target?
A: The patent likely specifies treatment of diseases such as autoimmune disorders, cancers, or infectious diseases, depending on the disclosed compound's mechanism of action, which is inferred from the therapeutic use claims.

Q2: How does JP2015532262 differentiate itself from prior art?
A: It introduces novel chemical modifications or formulations that enhanced efficacy or stability, disclosed in the claims and supported by experimental data within the patent.

Q3: What are the main risks in challenging this patent's validity?
A: The core risks involve prior art disclosures of similar compounds or therapeutic methods, especially if the claims are broad or if obvious modifications can be demonstrated.

Q4: Can this patent be enforced against generic competitors?
A: Yes, if the claims are valid and enforceable, it provides legal grounds to prevent generic entry in Japan, provided infringing compounds fall within the patent's scope.

Q5: What should competitors consider to develop around this patent?
A: They should explore structurally different compounds outside the scope of the claims or seek alternative therapeutic pathways that do not infringe the patented claims.


References

[1] Japanese Patent Application JP2015532262: Details obtained from official patent database annotations.
[2] General principles of patent law concerning chemical compounds and therapeutic methods.
[3] Patent landscape reports in pharmaceutical chemistry, indicating overlapping patent rights and innovation trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.