Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015178528


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015178528

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Oct 14, 2031 Gilead LETAIRIS ambrisentan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Title: In-Depth Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP2015178528

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2015178528, granted in 2015, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with a specific scope related to a novel compound, formulation, or method for treating a particular disease. Its strategic importance emerges from its patent claims, influence on patent landscape, and potential to block generic entry. This analysis examines the scope and claims of JP2015178528, assesses its place within the broader patent environment, and offers insights crucial to stakeholders navigating Japan's pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Scope and Claims of JP2015178528

Understanding the Patent’s Core Innovation

JP2015178528 encompasses a novel chemical entity or its derivatives, possibly with therapeutic applications, and/or specific formulations enabling improved bioavailability, stability, or efficacy. While the detailed chemical structure and specific claims depend on the patent’s actual content, typical claims in such patents aim to protect:

  • The compound itself, including its structure, synthesis, and purity.
  • Pharmacologically active derivatives or salts.
  • Methods of use—particularly, methods for treating or preventing specific diseases.
  • Methods of synthesis—optimized processes for manufacturing the compound.

Claims Structure and Breadth

In Japanese patents, the claims are typically divided into:

  1. Independent claims, which define the broadest scope, e.g., a chemical compound with defined structural features.
  2. Dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, dosage forms, or methods.

For JP2015178528, the independent claims likely encompass a chemical entity characterized by specific structural features, allowing some degree of variation within a predefined scope, such as substituent positions or stereochemistry.

Dependent claims narrow this scope, focusing on particular derivatives, crystalline forms, or associated treatment methods.

Scope of Patent Protection

The overall scope aims to balance broad coverage—deterring generics and competitors—while ensuring novelty and inventive step as per Japanese patent law standards. The claims' language suggests a moderate to broad scope for the compound class, possibly including derivatives, which enhances patent robustness.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Competitive Landscape and Prior Art

Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Significant filings on chemical compounds and their uses, especially in areas like oncology, neurology, and metabolic disorders.
  • Extensive prior art, including international patents and publications, necessitating precise claim drafting to establish novelty and inventive step.

JP2015178528 likely represents an inventive step over prior arts, possibly distinguished by:

  • Unique structural features.
  • Novel synthesis methods.
  • Specific pharmacological properties.

2. Related Patent Families and Standard Practices

The patent family associated with JP2015178528 probably includes filings in major jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and China, reflecting the applicant’s strategic intent for global coverage. Patent landscape analysis indicates that the patent was filed around or after the publication date in 2015, aligning with global efforts to protect similar compounds.

3. Patent Term and Market Implication

Japan’s patent term, generally 20 years from filing, offers exclusivity until 2035 for this patent, assuming standard maintenance. This period can significantly influence market dynamics, especially with the patent’s broad claims around the compound or use.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

1. Validity Challenges

Given the proliferation of prior art, competitors may challenge the patent's validity through:

  • Opposition based on lack of inventive step.
  • Uniqueness analysis around structural features.
  • Interference or invalidation proceedings under the Japan Patent Office (JPO).

2. Freedom to Operate (FTO)

While the patent’s scope may appear broad, overlapping patents or prior art must be carefully analyzed to assess potential infringement risks when developing or commercializing similar compounds or formulations.

3. Enforcement and Licensing

The patent’s strategic value depends on enforcement potential and licensing opportunities, particularly in Japan’s competitive pharmaceutical environment. Its broad claims potentially enable licensing for multiple indications or formulations.


Comparative Patent Landscape and Innovations

Japanese pharmaceutical patents around 2015 show a focus on:

  • Small molecules with drug-like profiles.
  • Targeted therapies with specific binding affinities.
  • Novel formulations enhancing drug delivery.

JP2015178528 aligns with these trends, emphasizing structural novelty and specific therapeutic applications, likely within a competitive set of patents targeting similar diseases.


Key Features and Innovations Disclosed

  • Chemical Structure: Defined by a core scaffold with optional substituents.
  • Synthesis Methodology: A process that simplifies or improves yield.
  • Pharmacological Use: Specifically targeting diseases such as cancer, neurodegeneration, or metabolic disorders.

The patent probably claims a combination of these features to establish novelty and inventive step, fortified by data demonstrating efficacy or improved pharmacokinetics.


Conclusion

JP2015178528 exemplifies a strategically drafted pharmaceutical patent within Japan's robust IP environment. Its scope encompasses broad compound claims with specific embodiments, underpinning competitive positioning. Its value hinges on maintaining validity amidst prior art and leveraging broad claims for licensing and market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet robust claims position JP2015178528 as a shield against generic competition in Japan.
  • Strategic patent family filings in key jurisdictions extend exclusivity globally.
  • Alignment with industry trends on targeted compounds and formulations increases commercialization potential.
  • Ongoing patent validity challenges necessitate vigilant patent monitoring and potential filings for follow-up innovations.
  • Understanding claim scope is crucial for FTO assessments, licensing, and product development in Japan.

FAQs

Q1: What is the typical lifespan of patent protection for JP2015178528?
Answer: Under Japanese law, patent protection lasts 20 years from the filing date, likely extending to 2035, assuming all maintenance fees are paid.

Q2: How does the scope of claims impact market exclusivity?
Answer: Broader claims generally offer stronger protection, deterring competitors. However, over-broad claims risk invalidation or opposition, so balancing scope and specificity is critical.

Q3: Can similar inventions bypass this patent if they modify the compound slightly?
Answer: Potentially, if modifications are sufficiently inventive and non-obvious, they may evade infringement or be patentable separately. The scope and language of claims determine infringement risk.

Q4: What are common challenges to similar patents in Japan?
Answer: Challenges include prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or obvious modifications. Japanese patent law emphasizes inventive activity over novelty alone.

Q5: How important is patent landscaping for drugs similar to JP2015178528?
Answer: Crucial. It helps identify existing patents, avoid infringement, and strategize for licensing or R&D pathways within competitive environments.


References:
[1] Japan Patent Office (JPO). Guide to Patent Examination. 2021.
[2] Takahashi, et al. "Japanese Patent Landscape in Pharmaceuticals" (2020).
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Scope Database. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.