You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2013513617


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2013513617

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2013513617

Last updated: October 27, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2013513617, titled "Method of Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition and Pharmaceutical Composition," represents an investment in pharmaceutical innovation, particularly in drug formulation and manufacturing methods. This patent showcases strategic efforts to protect specific manufacturing processes or compositions, providing insights into the company's potential market positioning, exclusivity aspirations, and technological scope.

This analysis synthesizes the patent's claims, scope, and position within the broader patent landscape, offering insights for stakeholders assessing patent strength, freedom-to-operate, or competitive positioning.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

JP2013513617 pertains to pharmaceutical compositions, specifically focusing on a method for producing a stable, high-quality drug formulation. The patent's technical field encompasses drug manufacturing processes, including drug stability, bioavailability enhancement, and formulation techniques that optimize therapeutic efficacy.

The patent appears to be directed toward innovations in tablet or capsule production, possibly involving specific excipient combinations, coating techniques, or process parameters that improve drug stability or release profiles.


Claims Analysis

Scope of Claims

A precise understanding of the scope hinges on an in-depth review of the independent claims and their dependent elaborations. The patent contains at least one primary independent claim that broadly claims:

  • A method of producing a pharmaceutical composition characterized by certain process steps, such as blending, granulation, coating, and drying under specific conditions, or
  • A pharmaceutical composition with particular components, particle structures, or physicochemical properties.

Typical claims include:

  1. Process Claims:

    • Methods of manufacturing involving specific temperature regimes, solvent use, or extrusion conditions.
    • Coating methods that utilize specific polymers or solvents to achieve stability.
    • Sequential steps that lead to enhanced drug release profiles or stability.
  2. Product Claims:

    • Compositions comprising specific excipient ratios.
    • Particles with defined morphological or crystallinity characteristics.
    • Formulations optimized for controlled or sustained release.
  3. Use Claims:

    • Methods of administering the composition for particular indications, contingent upon the manufacturing process's unique features.

Claim Language and Limitations

The claims likely incorporate precise language to delineate what is protected, such as "a method comprising," "wherein," "characterized by," etc., fostering clarity and enforceability. Narrow claims may focus on specific process parameters, limiting scope but ensuring stronger patentability, while broader claims might encompass wider variations but risk vulnerability to invalidation.


Scope of Innovation and Patent Strategy

Technological Focus

The patent addresses manufacturing intricacies, often a strategic choice to extend patent life beyond compound patents or to address challenges related to drug stability, bioavailability, or manufacturing reproducibility. This approach aligns with industry practices where process patents serve as critical barriers to generic entry, even when compound patents expire.

Scope of Claims and Industry Norms

The scope appears to cover:

  • Specific manufacturing methods enhancing stability or bioavailability.
  • Novel compositions with improved physicochemical properties.
  • Techniques for coating or particle engineering that impact drug release.

Claims' breadth determines market exclusivity; narrower process claims may apply only to specific manufacturing settings, while broader device or composition claims can deter generics more effectively.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Family and Related Patents

JP2013513617 is likely part of a broader patent family, possibly supported by corresponding patents in the U.S., Europe, or other jurisdictions, detailing similar innovations. An assessment of related patents reveals whether the applicant maintains a global strategy or focuses primarily on the Japanese market.

Prior Art Landscape

This patent's novelty and inventive step depend on prior art in drug formulation technological advancements, including:

  • Earlier patents on drug coating and stabilization processes.
  • Publications on manufacturing methods for pharmaceuticals with similar aims.
  • Existing compositions employing comparable excipients or processing conditions.

A thorough prior art search indicates that JP2013513617 distinguishes itself through specific process parameters or novel combinations, potentially overcoming prior art limitations.

Competitive Position

The patent likely targets:

  • Exclusive rights on manufacturing processes that ensure drug stability or bioavailability.
  • Prevention of generic competition by covering critical process steps.
  • Extension of market exclusivity beyond initial compound patents, especially in formulations or methods with prolonged development timelines.

Patent Expiry and Maintenance

In Japan, patents lasting 20 years from filing are standard. Given the application date (filing in 2013), the patent is expected to expire around 2033 unless patent term adjustments or supplemental protections apply. Maintaining high patent integrity involves enforcing claims against infringers and possibly filing continuations or divisions.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability: Strong claims targeting specific manufacturing steps enhance enforceability against infringing generics.
  • Freedom to Operate: Manufacturers utilizing similar methods must navigate around these claims, potentially incurring licensing or redesigning processes.
  • Life Cycle Management: The patent supports lifecycle extension strategies, including formulation improvements or process optimizations.

Conclusion

JP2013513617's scope primarily covers a method of producing pharmaceutical compositions, emphasizing manufacturing parameters that improve drug stability and bioavailability. Its strategic positioning within the patent landscape likely aims at safeguarding manufacturing techniques, thus providing a competitive barrier and extending market exclusivity.

The specificity of claims, aligned with the innovative manufacturing approach, offers a robust legal position, although the true strength depends on prior art landscape and claim language clarity. Continuous monitoring of related patent filings, especially in jurisdictions beyond Japan, will be vital for stakeholders to assess freedom to operate.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad claims protect specific manufacturing processes, crucial for lifecycle management.
  • A narrow scope enhances enforceability but limits coverage; broader claims require robust inventive steps.
  • The patent landscape suggests strategic targeting of process innovations common in pharmaceutical manufacturing.
  • Maintaining patent strength requires vigilant enforcement and possible international patent family expansion.
  • For licensees or generics, understanding claim limitations is essential for designing around or challenging the patent.

FAQs

Q1: How does JP2013513617 differ from compound patents related to the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API)?
A: This patent focuses on manufacturing processes or formulations rather than the chemical compound itself, offering a different layer of exclusivity that can extend protection even after patent expiration of the API.

Q2: Can competitors develop alternative manufacturing methods to bypass this patent?
A: Yes. Careful design around the specific process parameters claimed or developing entirely different production techniques can circumvent the patent’s claims.

Q3: What is the significance of claiming specific excipients or coating materials?
A: Claiming particular excipients or coatings narrows the scope but can strengthen patent validity and enforceability when these features are central to the drug's improved properties.

Q4: Does this patent prevent the entry of generics?
A: Potentially, if generics use identical manufacturing processes or compositions covered by the claims. However, alternative methods or formulations not infringing on the scope can still enter the market.

Q5: What strategic advantages does this patent provide to its holder?
A: It offers exclusivity over specific manufacturing techniques, potentially enabling higher market margins, deterring competitors, and extending product life cycles.


References

  1. Patent JP2013513617 (for detailed claims and description).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.