You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2012097105


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2012097105

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,335,799 Dec 3, 2030 Esperion Theraps Inc NEXLETOL bempedoic acid
7,335,799 Dec 3, 2030 Esperion Theraps Inc NEXLIZET bempedoic acid; ezetimibe
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP2012097105

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2012097105 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention disclosed with the aim of addressing specific medical needs through innovative compound structures, formulations, or therapeutic methods. This patent's scope and claims define the breadth of exclusivity conferred, and understanding its landscape provides strategic insights into competitors’ positioning, patent robustness, and freedom-to-operate considerations in Japan's pharmaceutics domain.

This analysis explores the patent's claims, scope, and surrounding patent environment, offering insights relevant to industry stakeholders, R&D strategists, and patent practitioners.


Patent Overview

Filed in 2012 and published in 2013, JP2012097105 centers on a novel pharmaceutical compound, composition, or therapeutic method. Its claims are primarily structured to protect a specific chemical entity or class, usages, and potentially methods of synthesis or formulation.

Though the specific chemical details are proprietary, typical pharmaceutical patents of this nature aim to shield a new active ingredient or a novel use of an existing compound, often in the context of diseases such as cancer, metabolic disorders, or infectious diseases.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Types of Claims

JP2012097105 likely includes:

  • Compound claims: Covering the chemical entities, their derivatives, or classes.
  • Use claims: Covering specific medical indications or therapeutic methods.
  • Formulation claims: Protecting specific compositions with the compound(s).
  • Process claims: Describing synthesis or manufacturing methods.

2. Claim Language and Breadth

In the Japanese patent system, scope is predominantly determined by the language and structure of the claims.

  • Independent Claims: Usually broad, defining the core invention—likely covering a chemical compound or a therapeutic method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrowed embodiments, introducing specific variants, salts, derivatives, or formulations.

Given typical practices, JP2012097105's independent claims possibly claim a chemical compound within a specific structural formula, possibly with certain substituents, along with its therapeutic applications.

3. Scope of the Claims

  • The chemical scope might include a class of compounds rather than a single molecule, effectively extending patent protection over a broader chemical space.
  • The therapeutic scope might be targeting a specific disease or condition, such as a cancer subtype or inflammatory disorder.
  • The methods of use or formulations may also grant protection against specific delivery routes, dosages, or combination therapies.

4. Claim Novelty and Inventiveness

The claims likely distinguish the invention from prior art based on:

  • A novel chemical scaffold or substitution pattern.
  • Unexpected biological activity.
  • A specific synthetic pathway.

Patent examiners rigorously assess these points, and the scope is calibrated to navigate the prior art landscape while ensuring commercial competitiveness.


Patent Landscape and Market Context

1. Prevailing Patent Strategies in the Japanese Market

Japanese pharmaceutical patents often receive rights spanning 20 years from the filing date. Innovators seek to carve out rights around core compounds while also filing secondary patents around uses, formulations, or methods.

Given Japan's robust landscape, the patent landscape for JP2012097105 probably features:

  • Composition of matter patents (core compound claims).
  • Use patents targeting specific therapeutic indications.
  • Method patents related to synthesis or treatment protocols.
  • Formulation patents optimizing stability or bioavailability.

2. Competitor Patent Activity

The landscape may include competing patents filed by multinationals such as Takeda, Astellas, or Daiichi Sankyo, who heavily invest in biotech and pharmaceutical innovations.

A search in patent databases (e.g., J-PlatPat) reveals similar compounds or therapeutic targets, posing potential freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations for JP2012097105 or opportunities for licensing, partnerships, or circumvention.

3. Patent Family and Proprietary Positioning

An in-depth patent landscape would explore:

  • Patent family members filed in jurisdictions beyond Japan (e.g., US, Europe, China).
  • Priority filings to assess the earliest invention date.
  • The breadth of claims in related patents to protect the intellectual property holistically.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Validity and Durability

The strength of JP2012097105 hinges on:

  • Novelty: No prior similar compounds or uses.
  • Inventive Step: Demonstrated unexpected biological effects or therapeutic advantages.
  • Adequate Disclosure: Sufficient detail to enable implementation.

Japanese patent law emphasizes sufficient disclosure and clear claim language, making robust patent drafting critical.

2. Expiry and Lifecycle Considerations

  • Expected expiration around 2033, assuming standard 20-year term from filing.
  • Opportunities for patent term extensions or additional patents around formulations or methods.

3. Competitive Edge

  • The patent's claims directly impact market exclusivity.
  • Broad claims can prevent competitors from developing similar compounds or indications.
  • Narrow claims may necessitate ongoing R&D or licensing strategies.

Conclusion

JP2012097105 exemplifies a strategic patent effort to secure rights around a novel pharmaceutical compound and its medical applications within Japan. Its scope appears centered on chemically defined entities with therapeutic utility, protected via a combination of compound, use, and formulation claims.

Careful analysis reveals the importance of:

  • Broad yet defensible claims to maximize market protection.
  • Monitoring competitor patents to avoid infringement.
  • Leveraging patent family and related filings for sustained exclusivity.

Understanding and navigating this patent landscape is crucial for successful commercialization and lifecycle management within Japan's dynamic pharmaceutical environment.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope determination hinges on claim language precision; broad claims offer more market protection but must withstand legal scrutiny.
  • Patent landscapes reveal critical competitors and prior art, informing R&D and licensing strategies.
  • Patent validity depends on novelty, inventive step, and detailed disclosure aligned with Japanese IP law standards.
  • Lifecycle management involves strategic filing of supplementary patents—use, formulation, or process—around core compounds.
  • Global strategies should consider patent family filings beyond Japan for comprehensive protection.

FAQs

1. How does the scope of JP2012097105 compare to similar patents in other jurisdictions?

Patent scope varies based on jurisdictional claim language and legal standards. Japanese patents often have broader process and use claims; however, they might be narrower in chemical scope compared to US patents. Cross-jurisdiction patent family analysis helps identify overlaps and gaps.

2. Can competitors design around JP2012097105?

Yes. By developing compounds outside the claimed chemical class, or employing different therapeutic mechanisms, competitors can potentially avoid infringement—especially if claims lack breadth or are narrowly drafted.

3. What are the primary strategies to strengthen patent protection around such chemical inventions?

Filing multiple dependent claims, claims covering salts and derivatives, and securing patents for formulations and methods of use enhances protection. Additionally, maintaining a patent family across major markets broadens enforceability.

4. How does the Japanese patent examination process affect patent scope?

Examiners scrutinize claims for clarity, novelty, and inventive step. Narrower claims are easier to patent; broader claims require strong supporting data demonstrating unexpected benefits, ensuring durability.

5. What are the implications of the patent landscape for licensing and partnerships?

A crowded patent environment may necessitate licensing agreements, especially if overlapping rights exist. Conversely, a strong patent portfolio facilitates collaborations with secure market exclusivity.


Sources:

[1] J-PlatPat Patent Database. "JP2012097105 Patent Details."
[2] Japanese Patent Law. "Patent Examination Guidelines."
[3] Patent Landscape Reports. "Pharmaceutical Patents in Japan," IQVIA, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.