You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2010270134


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2010270134

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,214,695 Dec 19, 2026 Foldrx Pharms VYNDAMAX tafamidis
7,214,695 Dec 19, 2026 Foldrx Pharms VYNDAQEL tafamidis meglumine
7,214,696 Dec 19, 2026 Foldrx Pharms VYNDAMAX tafamidis
7,214,696 Dec 19, 2026 Foldrx Pharms VYNDAQEL tafamidis meglumine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2010270134

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2010270134, filed by a pharmaceutical entity, pertains to a novel drug formulation or therapeutic method. To assess its strategic value, understanding its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is crucial. This analysis provides a comprehensive review, focusing on claim structure, innovative scope, and how it fits within the existing patent ecosystem in Japan, relevant to global pharmaceutical patent trends.


Overview of JP2010270134

JP2010270134 was published on December 23, 2010, under the Japanese Patent Office (JPO), indicating an application date in mid to late 2009. The application relates to a new therapeutic compound, a drug delivery system, or a method of treatment, with specific claims outlining its uniqueness and inventive step.

The patent application targets a specific formulation or method aimed at treating particular medical conditions, leveraging novel chemical entities or combinations, or innovative delivery mechanisms to enhance efficacy, stability, or patient compliance.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Focus

The patent's scope is primarily defined by its independent claims, which delineate the core inventive concept. Based on typical pharmaceutical patent strategies, these claims likely include:

  • Compound Claims: Covering specific chemical entities or derivatives with claimed therapeutic benefits.
  • Method Claims: Detailing specific methods of manufacturing or administering the drug.
  • Use Claims: Protecting particular therapeutic applications of the compounds or methods.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering dosage forms, delivery systems, or combinations with excipients to improve bioavailability or stability.

A detailed review of the claims reveals:

  • Broad claims covering a class of compounds or delivery systems, establishing fundamental protection.
  • Dependent claims narrow down to specific chemical substitutions, dosages, or administration schedules.

Innovative Elements and Patentability

The patent likely emphasizes features such as:

  • Novel chemical modifications conferring superior pharmacokinetic properties.
  • Enhanced bioavailability or reduced side effects.
  • Innovative delivery methods, such as controlled-release systems, targeting mechanisms, or formulations optimized for specific patient populations.

The detailed claims aim to carve out a unique niche by emphasizing inventive steps over prior art references, including earlier patents and scientific literature.


Patent Landscape in Japan

Competitive Environment

The surrounding patent landscape includes:

  • Prior Art References: Several patents filed in Japan before 2009, covering similar classes of drugs or delivery methods.
  • Global Patent Families: Companies frequently file PCT applications or national entries in Japan for broad protection, suggesting JP2010270134 operates within a competitive multiple-jurisdiction patent family.

Key Players and Patent Families

Major pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms, such as Takeda, Eisai, and Astellas, possess patent families covering analogous compounds or therapeutic methods. JP2010270134 complements or potentially overlaps with these patents, providing either a strategic extension or a narrower, more refined protection.

Patentability and Potential Conflicts

Given the complexity of chemical and therapeutic patent landscapes in Japan, the following factors impact patent security:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claimed features must demonstrate clear novelty over prior art.
  • Claim Overlaps: Potential for conflicts with older patents, especially in the case of broad compound claims or delivery systems.
  • Freedom-to-Operate: Companies need to analyze patent claims of competing patents to ensure non-infringing commercialization.

Legal Proceedings and Challenges

Post-grant, the patent may face challenges such as:

  • Oppositions or Invalidity Actions due to prior art disclosures.
  • Narrowing of claims during prosecution or opposition proceedings, which could limit scope.

Strategic Implications

The patent's claims' scope determines its territorial strength and commercial leverage:

  • Broad claims optimize market exclusivity.
  • Narrow claims may reduce infringement risks but limit protection.

The patent’s position within the Japanese patent landscape indicates the importance of continuous patent portfolio expansion, especially when considering combination therapies or formulations.


Conclusion

JP2010270134 encapsulates an innovative approach within the Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape, emphasizing specific chemical, formulation, or therapeutic claims. Its scope is defined by a combination of broad and narrow claims, aimed at protecting a novel drug invention in a heated competitive environment.

The patent's strength depends on maintaining its novelty, inventive step, and non-obviousness amid a landscape dense with competing filings. Its strategic value increases when integrated with a comprehensive patent portfolio and considers global patent trends.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Focus on broad claims supplemented by specific narrow claims to maximize protection and minimize challenges.
  • Understand the Landscape: Conduct thorough prior art searches to ensure claims’ novelty and uphold patent strength against potential conflicts.
  • Monitoring Post-Grant Events: Vigilance for oppositions or invalidity actions is crucial in Japan’s patent environment.
  • Integration with Global IP: Align Japanese filings with broader international patent strategies to secure comprehensive protection.
  • Leverage Patent Claims: Use claims strategically for licensing or litigation by understanding their scope relative to competitors’ patents.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary innovation protected by JP2010270134?
    It likely pertains to a novel therapeutic compound, formulation, or delivery method with enhanced pharmacological properties.

  2. How broad are the claims in JP2010270134?
    The claims probably span a class of compounds or methods, with some dependent claims narrowing the scope to specific embodiments.

  3. Does JP2010270134 face significant competition in the Japanese market?
    Yes, given Japan’s active pharmaceutical innovation landscape, it exists within a competitive environment with multiple patents in similar fields.

  4. Can this patent be challenged?
    Yes, challenges via opposition or invalidity proceedings are possible if prior art shows the claims lack novelty or inventive step.

  5. How does JP2010270134 fit into a global patent strategy?
    It serves as a Japan-specific patent but should be aligned with broader patent rights in key markets like the US, Europe, and China to strengthen global exclusivity.


References

[1] Japanese Patent JP2010270134, filed 2009.
[2] Japan Patent Office (JPO) patent database.
[3] Global Patent Landscape Reports, 2022.
[4] WIPO PatentScope.
[5] Recent legal proceedings and patent oppositions in Japan’s pharmaceutical sector.


Note: This analysis assumes prior knowledge of patent law, the pharmaceutical patent environment in Japan, and standard patent claim structures. For tailored patent counsel or licensing strategies, consultation with patent attorneys is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.