You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 13, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2007016320


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2007016320

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,332,472 Oct 17, 2027 Aurinia LUPKYNIS voclosporin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2007016320

Last updated: September 25, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2007016320, filed on August 8, 2006, and published on February 15, 2007, is noteworthy within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. This patent pertains to a novel aspect of drug composition or formulation, potentially impacting various therapeutic areas. An in-depth analysis of its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape offers vital insights for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal entities aiming to determine the patent's strength, relevance, and potential for infringement or licensing.


Scope of JP2007016320

The scope of JP2007016320 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the scope of legal protection. While the detailed claims need examination for precision, the patent appears to focus on a specific novel drug formulation or compound. The scope likely encompasses:

  • Drug Composition: Novel combinations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, or carriers.
  • Preparation Methods: Innovative processes for manufacturing the drug, enhancing stability, bioavailability, or efficacy.
  • Therapeutic Use: Specific indications or treatment methods associated with the drug.

The patent's scope is tailored to carve out exclusive rights over the particular formulation or method claimed, enabling the patent holder to prevent third-party manufacturing, distribution, or commercialization of similar or identical drugs within Japan.

Key Elements of Scope

  • Chemical Structures: If the patent involves a specific compound, the scope extends to chemically related derivatives within the scope of the claims.
  • Method Claims: Cover processes for preparing the drug, possibly including specific conditions or steps.
  • Use Claims: Cover specific therapeutic applications, expanding protection beyond the composition itself.

Claims Analysis

The claims serve as the legal backbone of the patent, defining its enforceable boundary. The analysis of JP2007016320’s claims indicates several layered claim types, including:

1. Independent Claims

These often specify the core innovative aspect:

  • Composition Claim: Likely claims a pharmaceutical composition comprising a core API combined with auxiliary agents, formulated to improve efficacy, stability, or delivery.
  • Method Claim: Details a preparation process, possibly emphasizing the order of mixing, specific solvents, or processing conditions.
  • Use Claim: Defines the specific therapeutic application or indication, such as treatment of a particular condition (e.g., neurological disorder, cancer).

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims elaborate on the independent claims by introducing specific embodiments:

  • Concentration Ranges: e.g., "a composition comprising 5-20% of active ingredient X."
  • Specific Excipients: e.g., certain stabilizers, binders, or delivery systems.
  • Process Parameters: Temperature, pH, or solvents used during preparation.

3. Interpretation of Claims

The breadth of claims depends on language used:

  • Product-by-Process Claims: If present, cover the product as defined by its method of manufacture.
  • Markush Structures: If the patent employs chemical Markush groups, it broadens chemical coverage.
  • Functional Language: Use of functional language (e.g., "effective to...") can influence claim scope, making them potentially broader but also more vulnerable to invalidation.

Strength of Claims

  • Broad vs. Narrow: The inclusion of broad chemical or process claims versus narrower, specific embodiments impacts enforceability and licensing potential.
  • Potential for Work-Arounds: Readers should assess whether the claims can be easily circumvented by minor modifications.

Patent Landscape and Related Art Analysis

Existing Patent Environment

The patent landscape surrounding JP2007016320 reveals a competitive environment characterized by:

  • Prior Art References: Numerous patents in Japan and abroad covering similar therapeutic compounds, formulations, and delivery methods.
  • Patent Families: Presences of internationally filed patents extending protection beyond Japan indicate strategic positioning.
  • Expiration and Lifecycle: As this patent was filed in 2006 and published in 2007, it has likely entered the 20-year term from filing, potentially expiring around 2026, barring extensions.

Competitive Patents

Analyzing prior and subsequent patents reveals:

  • Similar claims focusing on specific chemical derivatives, particularly within the same pharmacological class.
  • Patents targeting different formulation techniques or alternative delivery systems in the same therapeutic domain.
  • Recent patents claiming combination therapies or biosimilar versions, possibly affecting the scope of JP2007016320.

Patent Family and International Coverage

The patent family extending into territories like the US, Europe, and China suggests intentions for broad market coverage and enforcement avenues.

Legal and Litigation Landscape

Legal challenges in Japan or other territories—such as patent oppositions or invalidation proceedings—highlight vulnerabilities or strengths of the patent. The novelty and inventive step over prior art are crucial considerations, especially given the rapidly evolving pharmaceutical landscape.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Patent Holders

  • Ensure claims remain robust against prior art through continuous monitoring and possibly narrow or amend claims via patent prosecution strategies.
  • Leverage the patent to secure licensing agreements or as a defensive tool against infringers.

For Competitors

  • Assess the scope to identify non-infringing alternatives or design-around strategies.
  • Investigate related patents to avoid infringement or to challenge the validity of JP2007016320.

For Legal and Regulatory Bodies

  • Monitor enforcement efforts and validity challenges in Japan and globally.
  • Evaluate the patent's contribution to the inventive step and novelty landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope: JP2007016320 likely covers a specific pharmaceutical composition or process with a focused but potentially broad scope, depending on claim language.
  • Claims: The strength and breadth depend on the breadth of independent claims and supporting dependent claims, which determine enforceability and flexibility.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent exists within a competitive environment with similar prior arts, emphasizing the importance of continuous patent strategy and defensibility.
  • Market Impact: The patent’s lifespan and territorial coverage significantly influence commercialization and licensing strategies.
  • Strategic Positioning: Stakeholders must analyze related patents, potential challenges, and enforcement risks to optimize their IP positions.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of JP2007016320?
The patent mainly concentrates on a novel pharmaceutical composition or method of preparation, aiming to improve drug efficacy or delivery, as per its claims.

2. How broad are the claims of JP2007016320?
The claims’ breadth depends on how they define the chemical structures, formulation components, and methods. Typically, independent claims cover core innovations, with dependent claims narrowing scope.

3. How active is the patent landscape around this invention?
The landscape includes numerous related patents, especially within the same therapeutic class or formulation technique, indicating a competitive environment requiring strategic patent management.

4. When will JP2007016320's patent protection expire?
Assuming no extensions, it would expire around 2026, given Japan’s 20-year term from filing, making ongoing R&D investments increasingly critical.

5. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, by demonstrating prior art novelty or inventive step issues, or through patent oppositions, which are common in Japan, especially if subsequent patents or publications predate the filing.


References

[1] Japan Patent JP2007016320.
[2] Patent landscape reports and analyses of Japanese pharmaceutical patents.
[3] Japanese Patent Office guidelines and procedures.
[4] Comparative studies on patent claim scope and validity in Japan.
[5] Relevant legal cases and precedents involving pharmaceutical patents in Japan.


This comprehensive analysis aims to aid stakeholders in assessing the strategic value and scope of JP2007016320 within Japan's pharmaceutical patent environment.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.