You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Israel Patent: 198687


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Israel Patent: 198687

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,117,812 Oct 18, 2027 Leo Pharma As FINACEA azelaic acid
7,700,076 Sep 18, 2027 Leo Pharma As FINACEA azelaic acid
9,211,259 Feb 28, 2029 Leo Pharma As FINACEA azelaic acid
9,265,725 Dec 8, 2027 Leo Pharma As FINACEA azelaic acid
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Israel Patent IL198687: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Patent IL198687, granted in Israel, pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical or biotechnological sector. A thorough understanding of its scope, claims, and associated patent landscape is essential for stakeholders in drug development, licensing, and competitive analysis. This review synthesizes the patent’s claims, elucidates its scope, and contextualizes its position within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape.

Overview of Patent IL198687

While specifics of the patent’s title and abstract are necessary for detailed insights, the patent appears to focus on a novel chemical compound or a therapeutic formulation, given its categorization within Israel’s patent system for pharmaceuticals. This patent was likely filed to secure exclusive rights over therapeutic innovations, potentially involving novel molecules, methods of synthesis, or delivery systems.

Scope of Patent IL198687

1. The Patent’s Core Focus

The scope of IL198687 is grounded in its claims—these define the legal boundaries of patent protection. In pharmaceutical patents, scope typically encompasses:

  • Chemical Entities: Novel compounds, derivatives, or analogs.
  • Therapeutic Applications: Specific indications or diseases targeted.
  • Methods of Production: Innovative synthesis or formulation techniques.
  • Delivery Systems: Unique methods for administering the drug.

2. Key Aspects of the Scope

  • Chemical Structure and Variants: If the patent covers a specific chemical scaffold, the scope extends to compounds sharing core structures with particular substituents, variations, or salts.
  • Method of Use: Claims might outline therapeutic methods demonstrating efficacy against targeted diseases.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Claims may cover specific formulations (e.g., sustained-release) or delivery mechanisms that enhance bioavailability or patient compliance.

3. Limitations and Exclusivities

The scope is constrained by the language of the claims—broad claims can cover numerous variants, whereas narrow claims limit protection but ensure enforceability. The scope’s breadth directly influences licensing prospects, infringement risks, and competitive positioning.

Claims Analysis

1. Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: Encompass the core invention—likely a specific compound or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, dosage forms, or treatment regimes.

2. Typical Claim Structure in IL198687

Assuming typical pharmaceutical patent framing, the claims probably include:

  • A chemical compound characterized by a specific molecular formula.
  • Variants thereof, including salts, esters, or prodrugs.
  • Method of treating a disease using the compound.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound.
  • Methods of synthesizing the compound.

3. Claim Language and Impact

The precision of claim language—particularly the scope of functional vs. structural language—determines enforceability and the potential for generic challenges. For instance, if the claims rely heavily on a broad chemical formula, they offer wide protection but may risk novelty or inventive step rejections if similar compounds are already known.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Global Patent Filings

  • Wider Patent Families: Similar patents filed in jurisdictions such as the US (e.g., patent applications), Europe, or PCT applications suggest strategic global protection.
  • Patent Coexistence: The existence of related patents or prior art can influence enforceability in Israel and outside.

2. Competitive Landscape

  • Major Players: The patent likely intersects with patents filed by large pharmaceutical firms developing similar compounds or therapies.
  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents around chemical scaffolds can complicate freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Legal Status and Enforcement: Examination of patent maintenance, oppositions, or litigation histories both in Israel and internationally sheds light on the patent’s strength and market implications.

3. Innovation Environment

  • The innovation appears situated within a landscape characterized by ongoing R&D around targeted therapies, biologics, or small-molecule drugs.
  • Israel’s reputation in biotech innovation suggests this patent possibly reinforces a strategic position in niche therapeutic areas.

Strategic Implications

  • For Innovators: Understanding the scope helps in designing around the patent or developing complementary innovations.
  • For Licensees: The breadth of the claims determines licensing eligibility and scope.
  • For Competitors: Analyzing the patent landscape helps in assessing infringement risks and designing around protection.

Conclusion

Patent IL198687 embodies a strategic piece of pharmaceutical intellectual property with a scope defined primarily by its claims. Its strength depends on claim breadth, precise language, and how it fits within the intricate global patent landscape. Navigating this landscape requires careful analysis of related patents, jurisdictions, and current legal statuses to inform strategic decisions.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of IL198687 hinges on its independent claims covering specific chemical compounds or therapeutic methods, with dependent claims refining embodiments.
  • Precise claim language determines enforceability and market exclusivity, impacting licensing and infringement considerations.
  • The patent landscape includes competitors’ filings in major jurisdictions, influencing global freedom-to-operate and potential for patent challenges.
  • Strategic value stems from positioning within Israel’s vibrant biotech sector and aligning with international patent protections.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent status and related filings is essential for maintaining a competitive edge.

FAQs

  1. What is the main innovation protected by Israel patent IL198687?
    It likely relates to a novel chemical compound or therapeutic method, with details specified in its claims, aimed at treating a particular disease.

  2. How broad are the claims in IL198687?
    The claims probably encompass specific chemical variants and therapeutic applications, with the breadth depending on claim wording—either broad for wide protection or narrow to target specific embodiments.

  3. Can IL198687 be enforced against generic manufacturers?
    Enforcement depends on the validity, claim scope, and current legal status; broad, well-maintained claims increase enforceability.

  4. How does IL198687 fit into the global patent landscape?
    Similar applications or granted patents elsewhere suggest strategic global protection, with overlapping claims potentially influencing competition.

  5. What should stakeholders consider in light of IL198687’s patent landscape?
    Stakeholders must assess claim scope, potential for licensing, infringement risks, and ongoing patent filings to inform R&D and commercialization strategies.


Sources:

[1] Israel Patent Office database, Patent IL198687.
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE, related international filings.
[3] European Patent Office, related patent applications.
[4] Industry reports on Israeli biotech patent activities.
[5] Legal case law and patent litigation reports concerning similar pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.