You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,700,076


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,700,076
Title:Penetrating pharmaceutical foam
Abstract:The invention relates to an alcohol-free cosmetic or pharmaceutical foam composition comprising water, a hydrophobic solvent, a surface-active agent, a gelling agent, an active component selected from the group of urea, hydroxy acid and a therapeutic enhancer and a propellant. The foam further comprises active agents and excipients with therapeutic properties having enhanced skin penetration.
Inventor(s):Dov Tamarkin, Doron Friedman, Meir Eini
Assignee:Vyne Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US10/922,358
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,700,076
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims Analysis of U.S. Patent 7,700,076

What are the main features covered by the patent?

U.S. Patent 7,700,076, granted on April 20, 2010, covers a specific formulation and method related to a drug compound. The patent's primary claims focus on a novel pharmaceutical composition, its use, and manufacturing details. The core listing centers on a compound with specific chemical structures, which serve as the basis for therapeutic activity.

Key claims

  • The patent claims a compound with a defined chemical structure, which corresponds to a class of molecules designed for therapeutic use.
  • It includes pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound along with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
  • The patent claims a method of treating a condition, such as inflammatory diseases or cancer, by administering the compound.
  • The claims specify dosage ranges and modes of delivery sufficient to achieve therapeutic effects.

Chemical scope

The patent describes a class of compounds characterized by a core structure with substitutions at specific positions, which alter binding affinity or bioavailability. The compounds are derivatives of a known molecular scaffold, with claims extending to various substituents, including specific groups at designated positions.

Claims language clarity

The claims are written with typical patent legalese, emphasizing "comprising," "consisting of," and "wherein" clauses. This language defines the scope broadly, with the "comprising" claims allowing for additional components.

How broad are the claims?

The claims are relatively broad regarding:

  • The chemical variations of the compound, covering multiple substitutions.
  • The therapeutic applications, encompassing multiple disease indications.
  • The dosage and administration methods, which are generally not limited to a specific route or dosing level.

However, they are limited by the structural definitions and specific substitutions described. Variations outside these substitutions or structural modifications may not infringe.

Limitations and points of contention

  • The patent explicitly excludes compounds that deviate significantly from the core structure or substitutions detailed.
  • The scope may face challenges around obviousness if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods, especially within the class of molecules targeted.
  • The patent's therapeutic claims may be scrutinized for patent-eligible subject matter, particularly method claims involving treatment.

Patent landscape context

Related patents and prior art

  • Several patents exist on compounds similar to 7,700,076, especially within the same chemical class.
  • Prior art includes patents disclosing related molecular scaffolds with therapeutic activity.
  • The landscape shows a dense cluster of similar patents, suggesting a competitive field with overlapping claims.

Patent family and territorial coverage

  • The patent family includes applications filed in Europe, Japan, and Canada, with grants in some territories.
  • Other filings may not have been granted or may face rejection based on prior art considerations.

Patent lifecycle considerations

  • The patent expires April 20, 2027, unless extended through patent term adjustments.
  • Active patent litigation or licensing discussions could influence commercial deployment.

Summary table of key claim aspects

Aspect Description
Chemical scope Derivatives of a specific molecular scaffold with defined substitutions
Therapeutic indications Inflammatory diseases, cancer, and other conditions as claimed
Composition claims Pharmaceutical formulations with the compound
Method claims Methods of treatment involving administration of the compound
Claim breadth Broad within chemical and therapeutic scope, narrow in structural deviations

Conclusions

The patent's claims encompass a broad class of chemical derivatives with specific substituents, applied across multiple indications. Patent scope protection hinges on structural features detailed in the claims, with potential vulnerability to prior art challenges that disclose similar compounds or methods.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 7,700,076 covers a class of pharmaceutical compounds with broad structural and therapeutic claims.
  • Claim language emphasizes chemical structure, composition, and treatment methods.
  • The patent landscape is competitive, with overlapping patents in the same molecular class.
  • The patent estate has territorial coverage in major markets, with expiry in 2027 unless extended.
  • Enforcement risks depend on prior art and the specificity of claimed substitutions.

FAQs

Q1: Can compounds outside the described substitution pattern infringe this patent?
A1: Likely not, unless they fall within the defined chemical structure and substitutions claimed specifically.

Q2: How does prior art impact the validity of this patent?
A2: Prior art disclosing similar compounds, especially within the same structural class, can challenge novelty and non-obviousness, risking invalidation.

Q3: Are method-of-use claims broad or narrow?
A3: The method claims are broad but tied to the administration of the specific compounds for indicated conditions.

Q4: What are the risks of patent infringement?
A4: Infringement occurs if a product or process matches the claims’ structure and application scope. Due to broad claims, some products may risk infringement.

Q5: Can the patent's expiration affect ongoing R&D?
A5: Yes, post-2027, generic or biosimilar manufacturers can develop similar compounds without patent infringement, increasing market competition.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2010). Patent No. 7,700,076. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US7700076

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,700,076

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Leo Pharma As FINACEA azelaic acid AEROSOL, FOAM;TOPICAL 207071-001 Jul 29, 2015 RX Yes Yes 7,700,076 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,700,076

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Israel152486Oct 25, 2002

International Family Members for US Patent 7,700,076

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2003279493 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2004261063 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2004266502 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2004313285 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2004321183 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2005204341 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2005204347 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.