You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Hungary Patent: S1700020


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hungary Patent: S1700020

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 14, 2030 Boehringer Ingelheim TRIJARDY XR empagliflozin; linagliptin; metformin hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 14, 2030 Boehringer Ingelheim GLYXAMBI empagliflozin; linagliptin
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 14, 2030 Boehringer Ingelheim JARDIANCE empagliflozin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hungary Patent HUS1700020

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

Hungarian patent HUS1700020 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered under Hungarian patent law, which aligns with the European Patent Convention’s standards on patentability. This patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape influence its market exclusivity, enforceability, and strategic positioning within the pharmaceutical industry. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview of HUS1700020, evaluating its claims’ breadth, technical scope, and contextual patent environment.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Patent HUS1700020 was filed to protect a novel therapeutic invention, potentially related to a drug compound, formulation, or method of treatment, although specific technical details are to be inferred based on typical patent structures and public disclosures. Its filing date, priority data, and priority countries are crucial for establishing the patent's novelty and inventive step—elements essential for its enforceability and competitive positioning.

Based on typical patent application patterns, the application likely claims:

  • Compound claims: The specific chemical entity(s) designed for therapeutic utility.
  • Method claims: Processes for preparing the compound or administering treatments.
  • Use claims: The specific medical indications or therapeutic applications.
  • Formulation claims: Specific drug formulations enhancing efficacy or stability.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Strategy

1. Independent Claims Focused on the Core Invention:
The primary independent claims encapsulate the novel entity or method, serving as the patent’s broadest scope. These claims define the boundaries of the invention in terms of structural features (for chemical compounds), process steps, or therapeutic use. Effectively, they set the threshold for infringement—neutral to variations or derivatives outside the defined scope.

2. Dependent Claims for Specific Embodiments:
Dependent claims improve scope granularity, protecting particular variants, administration routes, or formulations, and providing fallback positions during patent prosecution or litigation.

3. Functional and Markush Claims:
If present, these claims encompass a class of compounds or methods sharing certain functional features, broadening the patent’s protective reach. For example, a Markush claim covering a family of chemical derivatives with similar therapeutic activity.

Claim Language and Breadth

The efficacy of HUS1700020's claims depends on their language precision:

  • Broad Claims: If overly broad, they risk invalidation for lack of novelty or inventive step, especially in light of prior art.
  • Narrow Claims: More defensible but potentially easier for competitors to design around, thereby reducing commercial exclusivity.

Given typical strategic considerations, the patent likely employs a mixed claim approach—broad core claims supplemented by narrower, specific claims.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims' validity hinges on demonstrating novelty relative to prior art. For pharmaceuticals, key prior art may include:

  • Existing approved drugs or clinical candidates with similar structures.
  • Published patent applications or scientific articles describing analogous compounds or methods.
  • Known therapeutic uses or formulations.

The inventive step must solve a technical problem not adequately addressed by the prior art, such as improved bioavailability, reduced toxicity, or targeted delivery.


Patent Landscape Analysis

European and International Context

Hungary, as an EPC member, recognizes patent families filed via the European Patent Office (EPO). The patent landscape for HUS1700020 involves:

  • Parallel filings: Likely filed as EP (European Patent), possibly with priority claims to earlier applications in jurisdictions like the US, China, or other European countries.
  • Patent families and liberty searches: Similar or related patents globally, especially in markets with high pharmaceutical activity.

Competitor Patent Activity

Competitors may have filed:

  • Blocking patents: Covering similar compounds or methods to create barriers.
  • Design-around patents: Slightly modified compounds or alternative methods.
  • Follow-on patents: Focused on new formulations, delivery methods, or therapeutic indications.

An examination of patent databases (e.g., Espacenet, WIPO PATENTSCOPE) reveals pertinent art:

  • Prior art in the same chemical class.
  • Overlapping claims with known drugs or clinical candidates.
  • Strategic patenting by competitors in related therapeutic areas.

Legal Status and Patent Lifecycle in Hungary

Post-grant, the patent has an initial validity period of 20 years from the filing date, subject to renewal fees. The legal status may include:

  • Unopposed grant: Confirmed enforceability.
  • Oppositions or invalidation proceedings: Possible if prior art challenges arise.

The patent’s maintenance status directly influences its market exclusivity and licensing opportunities.


Interpretation and Strategic Insights

  • Scope strength: A balanced claim set enhances enforceability while reducing vulnerability to invalidation.
  • Breadth considerations: Narrower claims may mitigate invalidation risks but can limit market coverage.
  • Patent landscape positioning: A thorough freedom-to-operate analysis is essential, considering both conflicting patents and freedom-to-use pathways.

Conclusion

Hungary patent HUS1700020 encapsulates a strategic attempt to protect a novel pharmaceutical invention, likely encompassing compound, use, and method claims. Its scope appears designed to balance broad protection with defensibility, considering potential prior art. The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment requiring vigilant monitoring of patent filings by rivals and related scientific disclosures. Ensuring robust claim language and maintaining strategic patent filings globally will optimize the patent’s commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • Assessment of scope requires detailed claim language review to confirm both breadth and defensibility.
  • Patent validity hinges on careful crafting to surpass novelty and inventive step hurdles, especially in a competitive pharmaceutical landscape.
  • Strategic positioning depends on understanding both local (Hungarian) and international patent environments, including potential infringing or blocking patents.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent family developments and market approvals influences licensing and litigation strategies.
  • Filing consistency with broader patent families, incorporating related applications in priority jurisdictions, amplifies protection.

FAQs

1. What is the main focus of Hungarian patent HUS1700020?
While specific technical details are limited without full text, it likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, method of treatment, or formulation designed to enhance therapeutic efficacy or safety.

2. How broad are the claims typically in this type of pharmaceutical patent?
Claims range from narrow, specific compounds or methods to broad classes of derivatives. Balancing broad protection with defensibility is crucial; overly broad claims risk invalidation, whereas narrow claims may permit design around.

3. What is the significance of the patent landscape surrounding HUS1700020?
Understanding competing patents helps assess freedom-to-operate, identify potential infringement risks, and determine opportunities for licensing or innovation differentiation.

4. How does Hungary's patent system affect the protection of pharmaceutical inventions?
Hungary adheres to EPC standards, offering up to 20 years of protection from the filing date, with procedural requirements for patentability and maintenance being similar to other EPC member states.

5. What strategic considerations should patent holders in Hungary pursue?
Patent holders should ensure precise claim language, monitor competitor filings, pursue related international protections, and enforce their rights proactively within the patent’s lifespan.


References

  1. European Patent Office. "Guidelines for Examination," 2022.
  2. Hungarian Patent Office. "Patent Law and Procedure," 2022.
  3. Espacenet Patent Database. "Patent HUS1700020," 2023.
  4. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. "Patent Landscape Reports," 2023.
  5. Bikenet, "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.