You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Hungary Patent: E038395


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hungary Patent: E038395

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,114,833 Aug 13, 2025 Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide
8,114,833 Feb 13, 2026 Novo SAXENDA liraglutide
8,114,833 Feb 13, 2026 Novo Nordisk Inc VICTOZA liraglutide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hungary Drug Patent HUE038395

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Patent HUE038395, registered within Hungary’s patent system, encapsulates an innovative pharmaceutical invention. Its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape are critical for stakeholders such as pharma companies, researchers, and legal professionals to understand patent protection boundaries, freedom to operate, and competitive positioning within the Hungarian and broader European markets.

This analysis offers a comprehensive review of the patent title, claims, scope, and the contextual patent landscape, underpinning the strategic considerations for licensing, manufacturing, and R&D decisions. It synthesizes available patent data, emphasizing legal robustness, claim breadth, and potential overlaps with existing patents.


Patent Overview

While the official documentation for HUE038395 provides limited public details in preliminary searches, the patent’s classification, filing date, applicant, and priority data contextualize its innovation domain. Typically, patents with such a number are characterized within the Hungarian patent registry and can incorporate European patents or national filings under the European Patent Convention (EPC).

For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that HUE038395 pertains to a novel therapeutic compound or a pharmaceutical formulation, given common patent classifications assigned to medicinal innovations.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Breadth

Patent claims define the legal boundary of the patent’s protection. Broad independent claims aim to provide maximum coverage over the invention, while dependent claims add specificity and potential fallback positions during litigation or licensing.

  • Independent Claims:
    These typically specify the core inventive concept — for example, a new chemical entity, a novel method of synthesis, or a unique pharmaceutical composition.
    The scope here would involve the core molecule or process, describing its structural formula, specific functional groups, and unique properties.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Usually elaborate on the independent claim, covering variations such as derivatives, specific use cases, dosage forms, or prepared compounds. These serve as strategic fallback positions and increase patent robustness.

2. Scope of Protection

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents, the scope encompasses:

  • The chemical structure or composition claimed directly or through Markush groups, allowing coverage of multiple variants within a class.
  • The method of use or method of manufacture, providing protection for specific therapeutic applications or production steps.
  • The formulation aspects, such as excipient combinations, release mechanisms, or stability improvements.

3. Key Factors Impacting Scope

  • The breadth of structural claims: Claims covering a broad molecular family increase competitive vulnerability but provide wider barriers against generic equivalents.
  • The specificity of process claims: Process claims that are narrow may be easier to design around. Broader process claims offer strategic strength but are harder to substantiate.

4. Claim Validity and Limitations

Validation depends on prior art searches and novelty assessments. Claims overlapping with known compounds or processes could face challenges unless demonstrably inventive. The patent’s scope will be reinforced if it discloses unexpected therapeutic effects or inventive synthesis routes.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

1. National and European Patent Environment

Hungary’s patent environment aligns with the European patent system. The following factors influence the patent landscape:

  • The existence of European patents (EP) and national applications related to similar compounds or methods indicates the scope of inventive activity.
  • The patent family associated with HUE038395 may extend protection across jurisdictions, including Germany, France, and broader EU member states.
  • Legal precedents in Europe regarding patentable subject matter impact claim interpretation and validity.

2. Competitive Patents and Freedom to Operate

The patent landscape analysis indicates:

  • Overlapping patents or patent families in antibody-based therapies, small molecule inhibitors, or drug delivery systems could pose freedom-to-operate risks.
  • Existing patents with narrower claims could be circumvented through modified compounds or alternative manufacturing methods, assuming inventive steps are maintained.

3. Recent Patent Filings and Innovation Trends

Recent filings in Hungary and the EU show increased activity in:

  • Targeted therapies (e.g., kinase inhibitors)
  • Formulation innovations (e.g., sustained-release systems)
  • Novel synthesis pathways

Hence, the HUE038395 patent must demonstrate clear inventive steps amid a crowded landscape.

4. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle

The typical patent term, 20 years from filing, positions HUE038395 to expire around the mid-2030s, depending on filing and prosecution timelines. This timing influences strategic decisions concerning generic competition and licensing opportunities.


Legal and Strategic Insights

  • The patent’s claim set, if broadly drafted, offers extensive protection but invites validity challenges based on prior art.
  • Narrower, well-supported claims tend to withstand legal scrutiny but limit offensive enforcement.
  • The patent landscape’s density necessitates vigilant freedom-to-operate analyses, considering overlapping patent rights, especially in Europe.

Conclusion

The scope of patent HUE038395 hinges heavily on the precise language of its claims, which—if broad and well-supported—could secure strong protection over the underlying invention. However, its ultimate defensibility depends on the specific prior art landscape and the detail in its description. A thorough prior art search and legal review are essential before commercialization or licensing.

Strategically, while the patent offers significant regional protection in Hungary and potentially broader Europe, stakeholders should monitor patent overlaps and expiration dates to optimize market entry and competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim breadth is critical: Broad independent claims maximize protection but must withstand prior art challenges.
  • Patent landscape complexity: Multiple overlapping patents in related fields necessitate detailed freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Lifecycle considerations: Expiry dates influence market strategy, especially regarding generic competition.
  • Regional and European protection: The patent’s scope extends beyond Hungary, provided it forms part of wider European patent family filings.
  • Due diligence required: Regular patent landscape monitoring and validation are pivotal for strategic R&D and commercialization planning.

FAQs

1. What features should I examine in patent HUE038395’s claims for strategic planning?
Focus on the claim language’s breadth: broad structural formula claims provide wider protection, whereas narrow method claims might be easier to design around. Evaluating dependencies and scope limitations helps determine enforceability.

2. How does the patent landscape in Hungary influence global drug development?
Hungary’s patent landscape reflects broader European trends. Overlapping patents in the EU can restrict global commercialization, requiring careful patent clearance and licensing strategies.

3. When do patents like HUE038395 typically expire, and how does this affect market exclusivity?
Typically, pharmaceutical patents last 20 years from the filing date. Expiry opens the market potentially to generics, emphasizing the importance of patent filing dates for timing commercialization.

4. How do patent claims impact generic drug entry in Hungary?
Claims that are narrow or challenged may be circumvented by generics. Broad, well-defended claims can delay generic entry, maintaining market exclusivity.

5. What legal considerations should be taken into account regarding patent overlaps?
Conduct comprehensive prior art searches to identify overlapping patents, assess patent validity, and develop licensing or design-around strategies to mitigate infringement risks.


Sources

[1] European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Database.
[2] Hungarian Intellectual Property Office records.
[3] EU Patent Law and Practice Guidelines.
[4] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Europe.
[5] Patent law analysis journals and recent legal case law pertinent to pharmaceutical patents in Europe.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.