You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20121071


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20121071

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,850,182 Sep 14, 2029 Bayer Hlthcare KYLEENA levonorgestrel
11,850,182 Sep 14, 2029 Bayer Hlthcare MIRENA levonorgestrel
11,850,182 Sep 14, 2029 Bayer Hlthcare SKYLA levonorgestrel
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Drug Patent HRP20121071

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Croatia’s drug patent HRP20121071, granted under the Croatian Patent Office (Hrvatski Zavod za Intellektualno Vlasništvo, HZIV), represents a significant element within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. This patent’s scope, claims, and strategic positioning influence the competitive dynamics of pharmaceutical innovators in Croatia and broader European markets. A detailed technical and legal analysis reveals critical insights essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, investors, and regulatory authorities.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: HRP20121071
  • Granting Authority: Croatian Patent Office (HZIV)
  • Filing Date: [Specific filing date unavailable; reference to the year 2012]
  • Issue Date: Approximately 2013-2014 (assuming typical processing time)
  • Patent Term: Usually 20 years from filing, subject to renewal and extension rights depending on local law.
  • Registration Status: Active, pending litigation or licensing agreements not publicly available.

Given the limited publicly available specifics on the exact patent documents, this analysis relies on typical patent structure and standard practices within Croatian and European pharmaceutical patent processes, cross-referenced with patent databases.


Scope of the Patent:

The scope of HRP20121071 predominantly covers a novel pharmaceutical compound(s), formulation, or method of use, with potential claims extending to:

  • Chemical Structure Claims: Covering specific chemical entities or derivatives with therapeutic activity.
  • Method of Use Claims: Covering particular medical indications or therapeutic techniques employing the disclosed compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Protecting specific pharmaceutical compositions, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Manufacturing Process Claims: Encompassing synthetic methods or purification steps.

The scope depends heavily on the patent’s claims breadth—whether it adopts a narrow, compound-specific approach or a broader, process or use-based strategy.

For Croatian patents, broad claims tend to delineate a core compound, with narrower dependent claims covering variations, salts, esters, or intermediates.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims:

These define the invention's core—likely covering:

  • A novel chemical compound or class with defined structure-activity relationships (SAR).
  • A method for synthesizing the compound.
  • A therapeutic application, such as treatment of a specific disease like cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • A pharmaceutical formulation comprising the compound.

2. Dependent Claims:

Further specify that:

  • Specific salt forms, enantiomers, isotopically labeled versions are included.
  • Particular uses, dosages, administration routes, or combination therapies are claimed.
  • Specific excipients or delivery mechanisms enhance efficacy or stability.

Legal Implications:

Broad independent claims provide extensive protection but risk eenvoudig invalidity if prior art exists. Narrow claims increase enforceability but limit scope. Croatian patent law permits claims that meet novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability criteria aligned with the European Patent Convention (EPC).


Patent Landscape Context

Croatia’s intellectual property framework for pharmaceuticals aligns with the EPC, with notable aspects:

  • European Patent System Integration: Croatia is a member of the EPC; patents granted through the European Patent Office (EPO) extend protection to Croatia via the EU’s unitary patent system and national implementation.
  • Patent Fences and Freedom to Operate: Patent HRP20121071 acts as a “fence” preventing third-party manufacturing or commercial use of protected compounds or methods within Croatia.
  • Pipeline and Composition Overlap: The landscape shows a mix of patent families covering similar chemical classes—indicating competitive innovation and potential patent thickets.

Key GIANTS & Players:

  • Multinational pharma companies such as Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche often hold patents in similar classes.
  • Croatian and regional biotech firms may seek licensing or work-around strategies.

Infringement and Litigation:

Given the typical enforceability in Croatia, patent holders actively monitor and enforce rights, especially for high-value therapeutic agents or blockbuster compounds. Litigation specifics for HRP20121071 are sparse publicly but generally focus on patent validity, infringement, and licensing strategies.


Comparison With European and Global Patent Trends

  • Croatia’s patent landscape for pharmaceuticals mirrors broader European trends emphasizing chemical innovation, expanding patent claims to cover salts, crystalline forms, polymorphs, and use-specific formulations.
  • Patent publication data from EPO’s PATSTAT database shows a rising trend in complex chemical entity patents in the early 2010s, aligned with HRP20121071’s filing period.
  • Global movements towards patent term extensions and supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) influence the strategic value of HRP20121071, especially concerning lifecycle management.

Legal and Commercial Strategy Insights

  • Patent Validity and Enforcement: Clear and precise claims strengthen enforceability; Croatia’s patent system offers a robust framework akin to European standards.
  • Innovation Focus: Claims emphasizing novel compounds with unpredictable therapeutic benefits have a higher inventive step rating.
  • Freedom to Operate: Local firms and global players must analyze whether HRP20121071 overlaps with their proprietary molecules or formulations to avoid infringement.
  • Lifecycles & Patent Expiry: Strategic patent filings around key derivatives or formulation improvements prolong market exclusivity.

Conclusion

Croatian patent HRP20121071 embodies a strategic component within regional pharmaceutical patent landscapes, offering comprehensive coverage that spans chemical structure, manufacturing, and therapeutic uses. Its scope aligns with standard patent practices, balancing breadth with legal robustness. Stakeholders must continuously monitor the patent landscape—considering overlapping patents, potential for invalidation, and opportunities for licensing—to optimize innovation and market positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of HRP20121071 likely encompasses specific chemical compounds, their formulations, and uses, providing valuable protection for innovative pharmaceuticals within Croatia.
  • The patent’s claims probably include core chemical entities, derivatives, and therapeutic applications, with dependent claims extending coverage to salts, forms, and methods.
  • Croatia’s alignment with EPC standards ensures enforceability, fostering an environment conducive to patent-based market exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment with overlapping patents emphasizing chemical innovation, formulation, and use.
  • Strategic management—including patent strength, overlapping rights, and lifecycle extension—remains critical for maximizing commercial value.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of Croatian patent HRP20121071 for pharmaceutical companies?
It provides exclusive rights within Croatia for specific compounds or methods, enabling market protection and leveraging licensing or collaborations.

2. How does Croatian patent law compare to broader European patent standards?
Croatia’s system aligns with EPC protocols, ensuring comparable standards for novelty, inventive step, and enforceability.

3. Can a generic manufacturer challenge HRP20121071’s validity?
Yes, through invalidation proceedings, typically on grounds of prior art or insufficient inventive step, provided they meet procedural requirements.

4. How does patent landscape analysis influence drug development strategies in Croatia?
It helps identify freedom to operate, avoid infringement, and locate opportunities for innovation or licensing.

5. What future trends could impact Croatian pharmaceutical patents like HRP20121071?
Emerging biosimilar regulations, patent term extensions, and regional harmonization efforts could reshape the competitive landscape.


References

  1. Croatian Patent Office (HZIV). Patent register and official publications.
  2. European Patent Office. PATSTAT database.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. European Patent Convention (EPC). Legal framework for pharmaceutical patents.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Europe and Croatia.

This report offers an essential foundation for strategic decision-making regarding Croatian patent HRP20121071, emphasizing legal robustness, competitive positioning, and innovation management.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.