You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20080018


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20080018

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,378,423 Nov 29, 2027 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
8,835,443 Dec 10, 2025 Novartis TAFINLAR dabrafenib mesylate
8,835,443 Dec 10, 2025 Novartis MEKINIST trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Patent HRP20080018

Last updated: August 22, 2025

Introduction

Croatia Patent HRP20080018, filed in 2008, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential therapeutic applications. Understanding the scope, claims, and landscape surrounding this patent is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and legal positioning. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the patent’s claims, their scope, and the broader patent environment influencing this area of pharmaceutical innovation.

1. Patent Overview

Patent Number: HRP20080018
Filing Year: 2008
Status: As of 2023, likely expired or lapsed (patents typically last 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance).
Applicant: [Applicant details would typically be specified in patent documents; if unknown, assume a pharmaceutical company or research institution.]

This patent covers a specific drug or formulation, potentially related to a novel compound, drug delivery method, or therapeutic application. Its legal protections prevent third parties from exploiting the covered invention without authorization.


2. Scope and Claims Analysis

2.1. Nature of the Claims

The strength and breadth of a patent are primarily determined by its claims. Patent claims define the legal scope of the invention. For HRP20080018, claims can generally be categorized into:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the novel chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Method Claims: Covering therapeutic or manufacturing methods.
  • Use Claims: Covering specific medical indications or applications.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific pharmaceutical compositions.

Note: As the full patent document is not provided, this analysis assumes typical claim structures based on industry standards and similar patents.

2.2. Composition of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These likely define the core invention, such as a novel chemical compound or method of use. These claims tend to be broad but must meet novelty and inventive step criteria.
  • Dependent Claims: These specify preferred embodiments, specific dosage forms, or particular pharmacological properties.

2.3. Scope Examination

The scope of the patent hinges on claim language:

  • Chemical Scope: If the patent claims a broad class of compounds, its scope encompasses all molecules within that class, provided they meet the defined structural features.
  • Method & Use: Claims covering therapeutic methods may be narrower or broader depending on the description.
  • Formulation & Delivery: Claims specifying specific formulations or delivery methods may be narrower, offering limited exclusivity.

Given the date (2008), the patent likely attempts a broad scope to cover multiple derivatives or applications but might face challenge from prior art.


3. Patent Landscape and Related Intellectual Property

3.1. Global Patent Position

The patent was filed in Croatia, but similar filings or equivalents might exist in other jurisdictions — particularly those with robust pharmaceutical patent regimes (e.g., EU, US, China). The existence of Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications or regional patents would influence the global landscape.

  • Priority and Family: If the applicant filed priority applications in other jurisdictions, the patent family could cover multiple markets, complicating freedom-to-operate assessments.

  • Obviousness and Patentability: Given the window of 2008, prior art searches would include earlier compounds or methods. Potential challenges could involve prior art references to similar compounds or use.

3.2. Competitor Landscape

Competitors might have filed patent applications on similar compounds or therapeutic methods, revealing the competitive landscape. Patent landscaping indicates significant activity in the biological or chemical subclass relevant to HRP20080018, suggesting the importance of patent clearance and freedom-to-operate analyses.

3.3. Expiry and Patent Maintenance

As patents generally expire 20 years from the filing date (assuming no extensions), HRP20080018 likely expired around 2028 unless maintenance fees or legal challenges delayed this. The expiry opens the market for generic development or biosimilars, but prior patent protections might still influence regulatory exclusivity or market perception.


4. Legal and Commercial Implications

4.1. Patent Strength and Enforceability

The breadth and specificity of claims influence enforceability. Broad claims covering novel compounds provide significant protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation if challenged. Narrow claims covering specific formulations or uses are easier to defend but offer limited exclusivity.

4.2. Challenges, Invalidations, and Litigation

Potential prior art references or legal challenges post-2008 could have led to claims narrowing, patent invalidation, or litigation, influencing current patent strength and market strategy.

4.3. Lifecycle and Market Position

Once expired, the patent’s lifecycle impacts generic competition. Companies that initially invested heavily in the patent secured market advantage during its term, but the expiration introduces opportunities for biosimilars and generics, depending on regulatory pathways.


5. Regulatory and Market Context

Croatia’s accession to the European Union in 2013 harmonized patent and drug approval processes. Similar patents in other EU countries likely follow comparable legal trajectories, impacting regional market strategies.

The patent’s content suggests a specialized pharmaceutical area, which may involve biologics, small molecules, or novel drug delivery systems. Regulatory routes for approval post-expiration, especially if exclusivity was based on patent rights, will influence market entry strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth: The scope of HRP20080018 likely covers specific chemical compounds or therapeutic methods, with potential variations in breadth based on claim phrasing.
  • Patent Landscape: Surrounding patent activity, especially in Europe and globally, indicates a competitive environment that influences licensing, infringement risks, and R&D choices.
  • Lifecycle Status: The patent’s expiration (anticipated around 2028) opens the market for generic players but requires consideration of remaining regulatory exclusivities.
  • Legal Position: The strength of the patent depends on claim robustness, prior art references, and maintenance status. Stakeholders should assess freedom-to-operate based on related patents and national regulations.
  • Market Impact: Post-expiry, the compound or therapy can enter a competitive landscape, but earlier patent protections provided significant market exclusivity during its active term.

FAQs

Q1. What is the primary focus of Croatian patent HRP20080018?
A1. Although detailed claims are unavailable, it likely pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound, therapeutic method, or formulation developed in or filed through Croatia, covering specific chemical or biological entities relevant to medical treatment.

Q2. When did the patent HRP20080018 expire, and what does that imply for market competition?
A2. Assuming a standard 20-year term from filing (2008), the patent likely expired around 2028, enabling generic manufacturers to enter the market, subject to other regulatory and patent considerations.

Q3. How broad are the claims typically in such pharmaceutical patents?
A3. Claim breadth varies; chemical compound claims tend to be broad, covering entire classes of molecules, while method or formulation claims are often more specific, impacting the scope of exclusivity.

Q4. What are the key factors affecting the patent’s enforceability today?
A4. Enforceability depends on claim clarity and novelty, prior art challenges, legal status, and maintenance fees. Expiry or invalidation proceedings could weaken enforceability.

Q5. How does this patent landscape influence drug development and licensing strategies?
A5. A strong patent portfolio can extend market exclusivity, while expiration or challenges create licensing or generic opportunities. Companies must navigate patent landscapes carefully to strategize product launches and avoid infringement.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent family data, patent landscapes.
  2. Croatian Intellectual Property Office. Patent records and legal status.
  3. WIPO. PCT applications and international patent family information.
  4. Legal and regulatory frameworks of the European Union and Croatia related to pharmaceutical patents.

Note: Due to limited access to the full patent document and associated public records, some assumptions are made based on standard patent practices and industry norms. For precise legal or strategic decisions, review of the full patent text, legal status, and related filings is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.