You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1218393


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1218393

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,377,933 Dec 11, 2027 Gilead LETAIRIS ambrisentan
9,474,752 Dec 11, 2027 Gilead LETAIRIS ambrisentan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1218393

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1218393 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical formulation or method intended for medical use. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors, enabling strategic decision-making around exclusivity, potential infringement, and competitive positioning. This comprehensive analysis distills the patent’s inventive bounds, delineates its claim scope, evaluates its interactions within the regional and global patent space, and discusses implications for innovation and market entry.

Overview of Patent HK1218393

Patent HK1218393 was granted by the Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department (HKIPD) and follows the procedures governed by the Patents Ordinance (Cap. 514). Hong Kong’s patent system aligns closely with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) standards, offering a robust framework for pharmaceutical innovations. The patent was filed with priority claims possibly originating from an earlier international or regional filing.

The patent covers a pharmaceutical composition/method, claiming specific formulations, processes, or uses that contribute to therapeutic efficacy or manufacturing efficiency. Its filing date, grant date, and priority details lay the groundwork for assessing its validity window and potential patent term.

Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

The claims constitute the core legal boundaries of the patent, defining the exclusive rights conferred. They are typically structured into independent and dependent claims, with independent claims setting broad inventive bounds and dependent claims adding specific embodiments or refinements.

Independent Claims

Most likely, the independent claims of HK1218393 focus on:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising one or more active ingredients combined with specific excipients or carriers.
  • A novel method of administering the composition, possibly including dosage regimens, routes, or timing.
  • A specific use of the composition for treating a particular condition or disease.

For instance, a typical independent claim might state:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising [active ingredient(s)] and [a particular excipient], wherein said composition is formulated for [specific administration route], characterized by [specific feature], and used for treating [disease/condition]."

This broad scope aims to encompass various embodiments that meet the underlying inventive concept.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims tend to specify:

  • Particular concentrations or ratios of active ingredients.
  • Specific excipient types or manufacturing methods.
  • Alternative formulations or delivery systems.

Such claims provide fallback positions if the broad independent claims are invalidated or challenged.

Claims Interpretation and Enforcement

In Hong Kong, claim interpretation involves a purposive approach emphasizing the words’ ordinary meaning in context. The scope is limited to what a person skilled in the art would understand. For patent enforcement, clearly defining the boundaries of infringement involves assessing whether a competitor's product or process falls within the language of the claims.

The patent's breadth and drafting quality influence its enforceability and susceptibility to invalidation. An overly broad claim risks invalidation, while overly narrow claims could limit commercial utility.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Global and Regional Patent Filings

The patent landscape for HK1218393 involves assessing filings in major jurisdictions such as Mainland China, the United States, Europe, Japan, and regional patent offices:

  • Priority filings: The patent may derive from PCT applications or regional filings, providing initial territorial scope.
  • Subsequent national phase entries: These determine the patent's strength beyond Hong Kong.
  • Similar patents: There may be analogous patents or published patent applications with overlapping claims, creating considerations for freedom-to-operate assessments.

Key Patent Families

Typically, pharmaceutical patents are part of broader patent families covering:

  • Compound patents: Covering the chemical entity itself.
  • Formulation patents: Covering specific compositions.
  • Method patents: Covering manufacturing or therapy methods.
  • Use patents: Covering novel therapeutic indications.

Understanding the patent family's composition aids in evaluating the comprehensive landscape and potential patent thickets that could influence market entry or licensing.

Landmark and Litigation

While Hong Kong's patent system is relatively new and less litigious compared to the US or Europe, prior cases involving pharmaceutical patents highlight the importance of robust claim drafting and clear inventive steps. Litigation risks include invalidity challenges based on inventive step, lack of novelty, or insufficient disclosure.

Innovative Significance and Patentability

The patent’s scope hinges on demonstrating inventive step and novelty — key criteria under Hong Kong law. Novelty requires that the claimed formulation or method is not disclosed publicly before the filing date. Inventive step demands an inventive leap over prior art, which often involves synergistic effects, unexpected benefits, or technical solutions to long-standing problems.

The patent landscape also includes prior patents on similar compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods, necessitating detailed patentability searches to confirm the patent’s distinctiveness.

Potential Encumbrances

Potential obstacles include prior art that discloses similar compositions or methods. Patent examiners may cite such art during prosecution, requiring claim amendments or arguments to establish inventive step. Ancillary patents or trade secrets in the same domain may also limit freedom to operate.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Patent Holders: The claims’ clarity and breadth serve as a foundation for licensing, enforcement, and revenue generation.
  • Competitors: Need to analyze claim scope for design-around strategies or to identify potential infringement risks.
  • Investors and Developers: Assess patent strength and landscape for market entry, partnership opportunities, and R&D prioritization.
  • Regulatory and Legal Entities: Use the patent landscape data to inform patent validity, infringement potential, and lifecycle management.

Future Outlook

The patent’s longevity spans typically 20 years from the filing date, provided maintenance fees are paid. As patent expiration approaches, competitors might enter the market or seek to challenge the patent’s validity through opposition or invalidity proceedings.

Continuous monitoring of related patent filings and legal challenges within the jurisdiction helps in managing risks and maximizing commercial opportunities.

Key Takeaways

  • Hong Kong patent HK1218393’s claims likely focus on specific pharmaceutical compositions or methods with defined inventive features, balancing broad protection with enforceability.
  • The patent landscape involves comparing prior art across multiple jurisdictions and understanding family patent structures.
  • Effective claim drafting and comprehensive patent searches are critical to maintaining competitive advantage and avoiding infringement.
  • Future strategic considerations include patent term management, potential challenges, and the evolving legal environment surrounding pharmaceutical patents.

FAQs

1. How can I determine whether a product infringes HK1218393?
Assess whether the product or method falls within the scope of the patent’s claims, considering claim language, equivalents, and potential doctrine of equivalents interpretations. Consulting a patent attorney is recommended for legal analysis.

2. What are the typical grounds for challenging the validity of HK1218393?
Invalidation can occur due to lack of novelty, obviousness (lack of inventive step), insufficient disclosure (lack of enablement), or prior art disclosures predating the patent’s filing date.

3. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
A comprehensive landscape helps identify freedom-to-operate zones, potential licensing opportunities, and areas requiring patent filings to secure market exclusivity.

4. Can patent HK1218393 be extended or renewed?
Hong Kong patents are granted for up to 20 years from the filing date, with maintenance fees payable annually to keep them in force.

5. What is the importance of the patent family in this context?
Patent families clarify the scope and geographical coverage of the invention, informing strategic decisions about regional patent filings, enforcement, and licensing.


References

[1] Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. Patents Ordinance (Cap. 514).
[2] WIPO. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) System.
[3] European Patent Office. Guidelines for Examination.
[4] World Patent Information. Legal Standards for Pharmaceutical Patents.
[5] Merges, R. P., Menell, P. S., & Lemley, M. A. (2020). Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age.

(Note: Specific details about the claims, priority dates, and prior art references require access to the official patent document and prior art searches. This analysis is based on typical patent assessment practices aligned with Hong Kong law and standard pharmaceutical patent strategies.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.