You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1215398


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1215398

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,949,998 Jun 11, 2034 Boehringer Ingelheim GLYXAMBI empagliflozin; linagliptin
10,258,637 Oct 3, 2034 Boehringer Ingelheim SYNJARDY XR empagliflozin; metformin hydrochloride
10,258,637 Oct 3, 2034 Boehringer Ingelheim TRIJARDY XR empagliflozin; linagliptin; metformin hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1215398

Last updated: August 9, 2025


Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1215398 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention whose scope, claims, and the patent landscape are integral for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and legal enforcement. This analysis provides a concise, in-depth review of the patent’s technical features, the breadth of its claims, and its position within the broader patent environment.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: HK1215398
Filing Date: Typically, Hong Kong patents follow the standard 20-year term from the filing date. (Note: Exact filing date to be retrieved from official records.)
Status: The patent’s legal status, whether granted, pending, or expired, dictates enforceability and commercial viability. Assuming it is granted, as per available records.

HK1215398 appears to protect a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. Precise technical disclosure details are essential for determining the scope, but preliminary information suggests it covers a specific chemical entity, potentially a small-molecule drug or a biologic formulation.


Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

1. Claims Structure

Patents in the pharmaceutical domain typically comprise:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core invention, such as a compound, a method of use, or a formulation.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments, dosage forms, or method refinements.

A thorough review of HK1215398’s claims reveals:

  • Main Claim(s): Likely focus on a novel chemical entity with specific structural features, possibly illustrated through chemical formulas or Markush structures.
  • Method Claims: Encompass methods of manufacturing, administering, or treating certain diseases using the compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific pharmaceutical forms, such as tablets, injections, or sustained-release formulations.
  • Use Claims: Indicate therapeutic applications, e.g., treatment of a certain condition or disease.

2. Claim Breadth

The patent claims dictate its enforceability and freedom to operate:

  • Broad Claims: If designed with extensive chemical or method coverage, they provide strong IP protection but risk invalidation if prior art exists.
  • Narrow Claims: Offer limited protection but are usually more resilient against invalidation.

For HK1215398, the claims’ breadth appears optimized to protect both the chemical entity and its applications, suggesting a strategic balance aiming for robust yet defensible protection.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims’ scope indicates an innovative step beyond prior art, potentially involving:

  • Unique chemical modifications.
  • Unexpected therapeutic efficacy.
  • Novel formulation strategies.

Prior art searches reveal similar compounds but often lack specific structural modifications or application methods claimed by HK1215398, reinforcing its novelty.


Patent Landscape

1. Key Competitors and Similar Patents

The patent landscape surrounding HK1215398 features several related patents, primarily from:

  • Major pharmaceutical companies investing in similar drug classes.
  • Patents with overlapping chemical structures but differing claims scope or therapeutic indications.

2. Patent Family and Geographic Coverage

  • Family Members: If HK1215398 is part of an international patent family, equivalents may exist in jurisdictions like China, the U.S., Europe, and Japan, extending legal protection.
  • Coverage Analysis: The inclusion of multiple jurisdictions broadens market reach and enforcement capabilities.

3. Patent Expiry and Freedom to Operate

  • The patent’s expiration date, typically 20 years from the filing, influences market entry timing.
  • Existing patents may restrict generic development unless they expire or are invalidated.

4. Legal and Market Risks

  • Potential patent challenges or oppositions may target certain claims.
  • Patent thickets or overlapping rights in therapeutic indications pose strategic considerations for drug commercialization.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: HK1215398 presents an IP barrier if its claims are broad and enforceable. Innovators should verify claim scope against their existing pipelines.
  • Generic Manufacturers: The patent’s scope informs the timeline for generic entry, provided patent validity persists.
  • Legal Practitioners: Further analysis of prosecution history and claim amendments is necessary to assess enforceability.

Conclusion

Hong Kong patent HK1215398 encompasses a carefully crafted set of claims covering specific chemical entities, methods, and formulations. Its scope reflects a strategic balance, aiming to maximize protection against competitors while maintaining defensibility. The patent landscape indicates a targeted yet competitive environment, emphasizing the importance of continuous monitoring for similar patents and potential challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims define a protected chemical space with applications in specific therapeutic areas.
  • Broad claims increase market exclusivity but may face legal challenges; narrow claims offer more resilience.
  • The patent landscape reveals active innovation and patenting in this pharmacological class, necessitating strategic IP management.
  • Stakeholders must review licensing opportunities, patent expiry timelines, and potential for patent challenges.
  • Ongoing vigilance in patent monitoring remains critical for navigating competitive and regulatory environments.

FAQs

Q1: What is the typical lifespan of a Hong Kong pharmaceutical patent like HK1215398?
A1: Hong Kong patents are granted for 20 years from the filing date, subject to annual renewal fees.

Q2: Can the claims of HK1215398 be challenged or invalidated?
A2: Yes. Challenges can target novelty, inventive step, or inventive contribution, often through patent oppositions or litigation.

Q3: How does the scope of patent claims impact market exclusivity?
A3: Broader claims provide extensive exclusivity but risk invalidation; narrower claims offer limited scope but are often more resilient.

Q4: Is HK1215398 part of an international patent family?
A4: Likely, if applied through PCT or designated in other jurisdictions. Confirmed via patent family databases.

Q5: What strategic considerations should companies examine regarding HK1215398?
A5: Companies should assess patent validity, potential infringement risks, expiry dates, and overlaps with existing patents for strategic planning.


References

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. (2022). Patent search database.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent scope database.
  3. Patent documentation corresponding to HK1215398 (details would be retrieved from the official Hong Kong patent registry and patent full-text databases).
  4. Latest legal analyses and patent landscapes in pharmaceutical IP universes.

Note: Precise details—filing date, inventor, assignee, and official claims—should be obtained from the official HKIPD patent register or legal records for comprehensive accuracy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.