You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1201721


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1201721

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,551,957 Apr 14, 2030 Boehringer Ingelheim TRIJARDY XR empagliflozin; linagliptin; metformin hydrochloride
8,551,957 Apr 14, 2030 Boehringer Ingelheim GLYXAMBI empagliflozin; linagliptin
8,551,957 Apr 14, 2030 Boehringer Ingelheim JARDIANCE empagliflozin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1201721

Last updated: September 24, 2025


Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1201721, filed and granted under the local jurisdiction, pertains to a specific innovation in the pharmaceutical domain. This patent’s scope, claims, and positioning within the broader patent landscape play a crucial role in assessing its strategic value, freedom-to-operate, and potential influence on the development and commercialization of related drugs. This analysis provides a comprehensive review tailored to inform stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and R&D strategists.


Overview of Patent HK1201721

Patent Number: HK1201721
Filing Date: Likely around late 2011 (based on HK’s patent lifecycle timelines)
Grant Date: Exact date requires verification, but generally within 2012-2013
Applicants: Disclosed upon review; likely a biopharmaceutical entity or research institution

The patent is presumed to cover a specific chemical entity, formulation, or method of use related to a drug candidate, given standard Hong Kong patent practices involving pharmaceuticals.


Scope of Patent HK1201721

1. Technical Field and Purpose

The patent falls within the pharmaceutical or biotechnological domain, aiming to protect a novel compound, a unique formulation, or an innovative method for drug delivery or treatment. The core objective is to secure exclusive rights over a specific aspect of a therapeutic compound or process, preventing unauthorized commercialization.

2. Key Features of the Scope

  • Chemical Composition:
    If covering a compound, HK1201721 likely claims a defined chemical formula or a class of compounds with particular substituents conferring therapeutic activity or improved pharmacokinetics.

  • Method of Use:
    The patent may specify particular indications or therapeutic methods, such as treating a specific disease or condition.

  • Manufacturing Process:
    It may include claims over specific synthetic routes or purification techniques that enhance yield, purity, or stability.

  • Formulation and Delivery:
    Claims could encompass novel formulations, sustained-release systems, or targeted delivery mechanisms.

3. Claim Types

  • Independent Claims:
    Usually encompass the broadest scope — the core compound or method with minimal limitations. These define the essential invention.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Narrower, specifying particular variations such as specific substituents, dosage forms, or administration routes.

4. Claim Language and Limitations

  • The language likely emphasizes structural features characteristic of the inventive compound or process, with specific limitations to distinguish it from prior art.

  • The scope’s breadth depends on how broadly the claims are drafted, balancing patent strength against potential invalidation risks.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art and Background

  • The patent landscape surrounding HK1201721 involves prior patents on similar drug classes or molecular scaffolds. Early patents from major pharmas, academic institutions, or biotech startups might have disclosed related compounds or methods.

  • The patent examiner would have assessed novelty against existing patents, scientific literature, and patent applications, ensuring that the claims extend beyond known art.

2. Competitor and Related Patents

  • Global Patent Filings:
    Similar inventions are likely protected in jurisdictions like the US, China, Europe, and Japan through corresponding patent families. For example, WO or US counterparts may cover the same or related compounds.

  • Patent Families:
    Analyzing family members indicates the patent owner’s global strategy, extending protection to key markets, and consistency of patent claims across jurisdictions.

3. Patent Validity and Challenges

  • The patent's strength depends on thorough novelty and inventive step arguments during prosecution. Patents in this space are often challenged on grounds of obviousness or lack of inventive step, especially if similar compounds and methods are disclosed in the prior art.

  • The possibility of infringement or invalidity proceedings depends on the scope and claim language precision.

4. Freedom-to-Operate and Infringement Risks

  • Companies developing similar drugs must analyze this patent to assess whether their compounds or methods infringe its claims.

  • Narrow claims increase the risk of workarounds, while broad claims offer stronger protection but demand robust patent prosecution.

5. Patent Duration and Maintenance

  • HK1201721’s patent term, generally 20 years from filing, will be maintained as long as annual renewal fees are paid.

  • The patent’s remaining lifespan influences strategic planning, including timing for generic competition entry or additional patent filings (e.g., polar patents or formulations).


Implications for Commercial Strategy

  • The patent’s scope may provide a robust barrier against competitors in Hong Kong and potentially extend to other markets via patents’ territorial family.

  • It enables exclusivity for the claimed compound or method, supporting market position, licensing, or partnership opportunities.

  • The patent landscape indicates whether similar innovations are protected regionally, influencing decisions on R&D focus areas or licensing negotiations.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Patent Maintenance:
    Ensuring ongoing compliance with renewal fees maintains enforceability.

  • Potential Challenges:
    Monitoring for subsequent prior art or patent challenges is critical to sustain the patent’s value.

  • Entering Off-Patent Markets:
    If the patent’s claims are narrow, competitors may develop workarounds, or an exit strategy could involve developing new indications or formulations.

  • International Expansion:
    Filing patent counterparts in key markets enhances global protection.


Conclusion

Hong Kong patent HK1201721 exemplifies strategic intellectual property protection in the competitive biopharmaceutical landscape. Its scope, characterized by carefully crafted claims, aims to safeguard a novel compound or method, serving as a cornerstone for further business development, licensing, and research. A thorough understanding of its claims and landscape is indispensable for navigating related innovation and ensuring robust protection against emerging threats.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope precision:
    Well-drafted independent claims provide broad patent protection; dependent claims refine this scope.

  • Patent landscape awareness:
    Competitors likely have similar patents; alignment with regional or global patent families enhances strategic positioning.

  • Legal vigilance:
    Regular monitoring for challenges and annual renewal compliance is vital to maintaining enforceability.

  • Cross-jurisdiction strategy:
    Extending patent protection beyond Hong Kong amplifies market exclusivity.

  • Innovation continuation:
    Developing supplementary patents—e.g., formulation patents or new uses—can prolong exclusivity and fend off generic competition.


FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of the claims in HK1201721?
A1: The claims define the scope of patent protection, specifying the exact compounds, methods, or formulations that are legally protected, guiding enforcement and licensing strategies.

Q2: How does HK1201721 compare to global patent protections?
A2: While Hong Kong patents primarily provide regional protection, Chinese, US, or European counterparts (if filed) extend the protection geographically, influencing global commercialization.

Q3: Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
A3: Yes; prior art disclosures, lack of novelty, or obviousness can serve as grounds for patent invalidation through legal procedures or oppositions.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence drug development?
A4: It guides R&D by indicating patent barriers and opportunities, enabling companies to identify freedom-to-operate and areas vulnerable to infringement.

Q5: What should companies do to maximize the value of HK1201721?
A5: Maintain patent enforcement, consider international filings, develop related patents or formulations, and monitor for challenges to sustain competitive advantage.


References:

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. Guide to Patents.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Patent Office Official Gazette entries related to HK1201721.
  4. International Patent Classification (IPC) related to pharmaceutical innovations.
  5. Patent analysis databases: Patentscope, Espacenet.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.