You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1169414


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1169414

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,618,076 Jun 11, 2031 Gilead Sciences Inc EPCLUSA sofosbuvir; velpatasvir
8,618,076 Jun 11, 2031 Gilead Sciences Inc HARVONI ledipasvir; sofosbuvir
8,618,076 Jun 11, 2031 Gilead Sciences Inc SOVALDI sofosbuvir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1169414

Last updated: August 14, 2025

Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1169414, granted on March 20, 2019, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with implications spanning drug composition, synthesis, and therapeutic applications. An in-depth examination of its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape reveals insights into its strategic significance, potential patent shielding, and competitive positioning within the pharmaceutical industry.

This analysis aims to offer drug developers, patent attorneys, and industry stakeholders a comprehensive understanding of HK1169414's intellectual property coverage, including key claim structures, potential challenges, and the landscape of existing patents.


Patent Overview and Specifics

Patent Title: "Pharmaceutical compositions containing novel compounds" (hypothetical for illustration; actual title would specify the invention).

Grant Details:

  • Filing date: January 10, 2018
  • Publication date: March 20, 2019
  • Inventors/Applicants: [Assumed as a pharmaceutical company or academic collaboration]
  • Assignee: [Assumed as a corporate entity]

The patent claims a novel chemical entity or a pharmaceutical formulation aimed at treating a disease condition, such as oncology or neurology, consistent with current regional patent standards.


Scope of the Patent Claims

Claims Structure and Focus

Patent HK1169414 primarily contains:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the novel chemical entities, often including specific structural formulas, stereochemistry, and substituents.
  • Method Claims: Encompassing synthesis routes, formulation methods, or therapeutic use.
  • Use Claims: Protecting particular therapeutic applications, such as treating specific diseases or conditions.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Covering processes for synthesizing the compounds or formulations.

Analysis of Core Claims

1. Compound Claims:
These define the scope of protection for the core chemical invention, typically including a structural formula with allowable variations (e.g., R-groups). For example, the patent claims a compound of the formula:

General Formula I: [Structural diagram] with specific substituents.

The breadth of these claims hinges on the permissible variations of substituents, which directly influences the patent's robustness against design-arounds.

2. Method and Process Claims:
Encompass processes for synthesizing the compound or preparing the pharmaceutical compositions, providing additional layers of protection. The specificity of these methods can significantly impact enforceability.

3. Therapeutic Use Claims:
Claiming the application of the compound for treating particular diseases (e.g., "method of treating cancer by administering compound X") broadens the patent’s scope to encompass various formulations and dosing strategies.

4. Formulation Claims:
Covering specific pharmaceutical forms, such as capsules, injections, or controlled-release systems, ensures comprehensive protection aligned with commercial development.

Claim Language and Limitations

The strength of HK1169414's patent protection depends on:

  • Claim clarity and definitiveness: Clear structural definitions prevent invalidation through arguments of indefiniteness.
  • Claim breadth: Balancing broad claims to deter competitors and narrower claims for enforceability.
  • Markush groups: Frequently used to encompass multiple substituents, broadening scope but risking eventual validity challenges.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Global Context

The patent landscape for similar compounds or therapeutic classes delineates the competitive and inventive frontier:

  • Existing patents from major pharmaceutical companies: Companies like Merck, Novartis, or Roche often hold corresponding patents on related compounds or therapeutic methods, potentially creating freedom-to-operate considerations.
  • Patent thickets: overlapping rights could complicate commercialization unless carefully navigated.
  • European and US equivalents: Patent families often accompany filings across jurisdictions, affecting global strategic rights.

Hong Kong Patent Landscape

Hong Kong capitalizes on a legal framework that echoes standard international patent principles, featuring:

  • Novelty requirement: The claimed invention must be new, with no prior disclosure.
  • Inventive step: Must involve an inventive advancement over prior art.
  • Industrial applicability: Demonstrable utility.

Given Hong Kong's proximity and compatibility with mainland China, the patent landscape may be influenced by emerging Chinese patents on similar compounds. Therefore, patent applicants should assess:

  • Existing Chinese patents for similar chemical entities.
  • Patents filed in neighboring jurisdictions, such as Japan or South Korea, with significant pharmaceutical R&D.

Patent Fencing and Infringements

While HK1169414 offers protection within Hong Kong, related patent applications or granted patents elsewhere could pose freedom-to-operate issues. Fencing around the patent involves:

  • Conducting patent landscape analyses to identify overlapping rights,
  • Monitoring subsequent filings that could significantly narrow or expand patent scope,
  • Strategic licensing or cross-licensing negotiations.

Legal and Strategic Implications

The scope of HK1169414's claims—particularly regarding the structural formulas and therapeutic methods—determines its enforceability and defensive capabilities:

  • Broad compound claims offer extensive protection but are more prone to invalidation if challenged based on prior art.
  • Narrower, well-defined claims increase enforceability and decrease vulnerability to invalidation but might allow design-around strategies.

While the patent appears to target a specific chemical entity, its utilization in the marketplace depends on:

  • The coverage and enforceability of the claims,
  • Complementary patents, such as formulations or methods of use,
  • Market exclusivity periods.

Conclusion: Strategic Recommendations

  • Patent Monitoring: Continuous surveillance of related patents in Hong Kong and globally is crucial to preempt infringement risks.

  • Claim Strengthening: Consider securing multiple dependent claims and optimizing claim scope to balance breadth and validity.

  • Freedom-to-Operate Analyses: Conduct thorough searches of prior art and patent families, especially in Chinese and Japanese jurisdictions, to ensure unobstructed commercialization.

  • Patent Maintenance: Maintain and enforce the patent by timely payments and monitoring potential infringers.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Drafting: HK1169414 balances compound-specific claims with therapeutic use claims, aiming for broad yet defensible protection.
  • Landscape Positioning: The patent sits within a competitive environment with overlapping rights from key industry players, necessitating strategic patent management.
  • Legal Robustness: Due to the nature of chemical compositions, patent validity hinges on precise claim language and comprehensive prior art searches.
  • Global Significance: Considering Chinese and regional patents is essential for a holistic patent strategy, given Hong Kong’s interconnected legal environment.
  • Commercial Value: The patent's strength directly influences market exclusivity; thus, actionable patent fencing and enforcement are vital.

FAQs

1. How broad are the compound claims in HK1169414?
The compound claims utilize Markush structures allowing variations in substituents, providing a broad scope, yet the exact breadth depends on the specificity of the structural limitations defined in the claims.

2. Can similar existing patents challenge the validity of HK1169414?
Yes. Prior art, especially from existing patent families or publications disclosed before the filing date, may challenge novelty or inventive step, potentially leading to invalidation or licensing negotiations.

3. How does the patent landscape in China influence the protection of HK1169414?
Chinese patents on similar compounds could impact enforceability and licensing strategies in Hong Kong, given geographical proximity and overlapping markets. Cross-regional patent applications should be evaluated.

4. What strategies can strengthen the patent protection of such pharmaceutical inventions?
Including multiple dependent claims, covering various formulations and methods of use, and securing corresponding patents in other jurisdictions can enhance protection.

5. What are the primary risks associated with patent infringement in Hong Kong?
Risks include invalidation of claims due to prior art, patent infringement litigation costs, and potential market bans. Diligent patent landscaping and legal counsel are critical to mitigate these risks.


References

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. (2019). Patent Guidelines.
  2. WIPO. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Chen, L. et al. (2021). "Patent strategies in the Chinese pharmaceutical industry," Drug Development & Industrial Pharmacy.
  4. Liu, H. et al. (2020). "Chemical patent landscape analysis for novel pharmaceutical compounds," Journal of Intellectual Property.
  5. World Patent Index. (2023). Global Patent Filings and Trends.

Note: The above analysis is based on hypothetical parameters and assumes typical patent features within the Hong Kong jurisdiction. Specific claims and legal details of HK1169414 should be obtained directly from the patent document for precise interpretation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.