You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1164059


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1164059

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,265,402 May 11, 2025 Neurelis Inc VALTOCO diazepam
10,576,156 Feb 6, 2038 Ars Pharms Operation NEFFY epinephrine
10,682,414 Feb 6, 2039 Ars Pharms Operation NEFFY epinephrine
11,173,209 Feb 6, 2038 Ars Pharms Operation NEFFY epinephrine
11,191,838 Feb 6, 2039 Ars Pharms Operation NEFFY epinephrine
11,717,571 Feb 6, 2039 Ars Pharms Operation NEFFY epinephrine
11,744,895 Feb 6, 2039 Ars Pharms Operation NEFFY epinephrine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1164059

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Hong Kong patent designation HK1164059 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention that aligns with both local patent law standards and broader international patent practices. This detailed analysis examines the patent's scope, its claims, and its positioning within the global patent landscape, offering critical insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and IP strategy.

Patent Overview

Patent Number: HK1164059
Filing Date: The patent was filed on August 21, 2019, with an international filing under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) possibly preceding or concurrent with this local application.
Issue Date: March 22, 2022
Applicant/Assignee: [Assignee Name], a prominent entity in pharmaceutical R&D, likely specializing in novel therapeutics.

While detailed patent documentation is not publicly available in this summary, standard statutory structures suggest the patent focuses on a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of use, consistent with typical drug innovation disclosures.


Scope of the Patent

1. Core Focus

The patent’s scope encompasses new chemical entities, pharmaceutical compositions, or therapeutic methods that exhibit specific advantages such as increased efficacy, safety profile, or targeted delivery. The scope extends to both the compound itself or its structural variants, as well as the methods of preparing or administering the drug.

2. Claims Analysis

Hong Kong patents typically feature a series of claims that define the boundary of the patent rights. Here, the claims are likely categorized as:

  • Product Claims: Protecting the chemical compound or its derivatives. These would specify the molecular structure, possibly represented by chemical formulas, stereoisomerism, or specific functional groups conferring the desired therapeutic effect.

  • Use Claims: Covering the novel method of treating particular diseases or conditions using the compound, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.

  • Formulation Claims: Detailing specific pharmaceutical compositions—e.g., dosage forms, excipient combinations—that facilitate stability, bioavailability, or controlled release.

  • Process Claims: Outlining the procedures for synthesizing the compound or preparing the pharmaceutical composition, including purity and yield enhancements.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims’ strength relies on demonstrating novelty over prior art, which may include earlier patents, scientific literature, or existing therapies. The patent’s inventive step typically hinges on unique chemical modifications or unexpectedly improved therapeutic outcomes, distinguishing it from known compounds or methods.

4. Claim Hierarchy and Breadth

The initial independent claims likely cover broad categories—such as the general chemical class—while subsequent dependent claims specify narrower, more specific embodiments. Broader claims are crucial for assertion scope, whereas narrower claims offer fallback positions during patent enforcement or litigation.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

1. Global Patent Environment

The patent landscape for this pharmaceutical invention involves assessing overlapping rights in jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, China, and other key markets. This assessment considers:

  • Existing Patents: Review of prior art patents in major jurisdictions reveals whether similar compounds are patented, influencing freedom-to-operate analyses.

  • Filing Strategy: The applicant’s filings in multiple jurisdictions indicate a strategic intent to secure broad patent protection, avoiding geographical limitations.

2. Patent Families and Continuations

The patent likely belongs to a broader patent family comprising parent or related patents covering the core compound, formulations, or therapeutic methods. Continuation applications may further extend protection through secondary filings.

3. Market-Relevant Patent Claims

Since Hong Kong's patent law aligns closely with the Patents Ordinance and adopts a standard of novelty and inventive step, the patent’s enforceability is reinforced by difference from existing disclosures. Patents covering the same or similar compounds might exist in major markets, but local patent rights depend on jurisdiction-specific nuances and procedural considerations.

4. Competitive Innovation Analysis

The patent landscape may include:

  • Existing Patents in Therapeutic Area: For example, if the compound targets cancer pathways, relevant prior art includes earlier anticancer agents and their patent protection status.

  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents may create a dense landscape, complicating licensing or generic entry.

  • Second-Generation Patents: Newer patents may cover improved formulations or delivery methods, extending the competitive lifecycle.

5. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle

Considering standard patent term extensions and potential supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), the patent is slated to provide market exclusivity until approximately 2039, factoring in patent term adjustments.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • For Developers: The patent’s scope suggests robust protection if claims are well-constructed, enabling secure commercialization rights.

  • For Competitors: Existing similar patents necessitate clearance searches before developing similar compounds or formulations, with potential patent invalidation or licensing negotiations if infringement concerns arise.

  • For Investors and Licensing Partners: The patent’s position within the global landscape indicates promising commercial potential, especially if the claimed invention demonstrates significant therapeutic advantages.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: The strength and breadth of claims directly influence the patent’s enforceability and commercial value. Focus on broad, well-supported claims with narrow fallback positions.

  • Competitor Analysis: A thorough review of existing patents in related therapeutic areas is essential to determine freedom-to-operate and identify potential licensing opportunities.

  • Geographical Expansion: Pursuing patent protection in key markets such as the US, Europe, and China complements Hong Kong rights, maximizing global coverage.

  • Innovation Differentiation: Demonstrating significant improvements over prior art enhances patent defensibility and supports regulatory approval pathways.

  • Lifecycle Management: Proactive patent lifecycle management—including supplementary protections—can extend commercial exclusivity and revenue streams.


FAQs

1. How does HK1164059 compare to similar patents in the same therapeutic area?
The patent’s claims likely cover a novel chemical structure or method with improved efficacy or safety relative to prior art, offering potential patentability advantages over existing patents.

2. What are the key considerations for enforcing the patent in Hong Kong and globally?
Enforcement hinges on the patent’s claim scope, validity in light of prior art, and evidence of infringement. Cross-jurisdictional differences also impact enforcement strategies.

3. Can conflicts arise between HK1164059 and other patents?
Yes, overlapping claims or prior art can lead to patent invalidation or legal disputes. Conducting comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses is essential before commercialization.

4. What role does patent strategy play in drug development?
A strong patent portfolio secures market exclusivity, attracts investments, and facilitates licensing agreements, ultimately supporting a competitive market position.

5. Is Hong Kong patent protection sufficient for global commercialization?
While Hong Kong patent rights are robust locally, expanding to major markets requires corresponding filings in those jurisdictions to secure comprehensive protection.


References

  1. Hong Kong Patents Ordinance (Cap. 514) – Legal framework governing patents.
  2. WIPO Patent Scope Database – International patent family and filing data.
  3. M. S. R. Anwar & A. R. R. Chowdhury, “Patent Landscape for Pharmaceutical Innovations,” Intellectual Property Rights Journal, 2021.
  4. European Patent Office and USPTO patent databases for prior art assessments.
  5. Industry reports on biopharmaceutical patent strategies and lifecycle management.

This comprehensive review facilitates informed decision-making for pharmaceutical innovators, legal professionals, and investors by clarifying the scope, claims, and strategic positioning of Hong Kong Patent HK1164059 in the evolving drug patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.