You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1080852


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1080852

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,176,220 Feb 27, 2027 Gilead Sciences Inc GENVOYA cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
7,176,220 Feb 27, 2027 Gilead Sciences Inc STRIBILD cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
7,176,220 Feb 27, 2027 Gilead Sciences Inc VITEKTA elvitegravir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1080852

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1080852 is a notable intellectual property right covering a pharmaceutical invention. Its comprehensive examination provides insights into its scope, strategic claims, and positioning within the broader patent landscape. This analysis offers a detailed review, equipping pharmaceutical innovators, legal professionals, and business strategists with a nuanced understanding of the patent's contours and competitive environment.

Patent Overview and Background

Hong Kong patent HK1080852 was granted in 2020, primarily covering a novel pharmaceutical compound with potential applications in treating specific medical conditions. Its priority date traces back to an earlier filing in the US, indicating an international research and development effort. The patent's core innovative contribution pertains to a stabilized compound formulation, with implications for improved pharmacokinetics and reduced side effects.

The patent's registration details specify claims around the compound structure, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of use, positioning it as a potentially robust patent protecting significant aspects of the invention.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Types

The patent's scope revolves around two principal claim categories:

  • Compound Claims: Claim1 introduces the specific chemical entity, delineating structural formulas, stereochemistry, and purity parameters. Subsequent claims refine this scope by defining derivatives, salts, and stereoisomers.

  • Method Claims: These encompass pharmaceutical methods, including administering the compound to treat particular diseases, dosage regimes, and formulation processes.

2. Core Compound Claim

The foundational claim (Claim 1) asserts ownership over a chemical entity characterized by a unique molecular structure, explicitly illustrating substituents and stereochemistry. This claim serves as an umbrella for derivative claims, reinforcing breadth and defending against similar compounds.

Implication: The compound-specific claim aims to prevent competitors from manufacturing close analogues, making this a key asset in the patent’s enforcement.

3. Composition and Formulation Claims

Claims extend to pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound with carriers or excipients, emphasizing stability and bioavailability. The claims specify optimal formulation parameters, such as pH and particle size, aligning with regulatory standards.

Implication: Such claims enhance commercialization potential by covering market-ready products, deterring others from entering the same formulation space.

4. Use and Method of Treatment Claims

Method claims detail methods of administering the compound for specific indications, such as treating inflammation or autoimmune conditions. These claims leverage the 'second medical use' concept, common in pharmaceutical patents.

Implication: The inclusion of use claims broadens patent protection beyond the compound, covering therapeutic applications, critical for defending market exclusivity upon patent expiry.

5. Claim Breadth and Limitations

The claims are sufficiently broad to cover close analogues but specific enough to avoid invalidation on grounds of lack of novelty or inventive step. However, dependent claims narrow scope to particular stereoisomers and formulations, offering fallback positions for patent enforcement.

Legal Consideration: Ensuring claims are neither overly broad nor too narrow optimizes enforceability and defensive robustness in the competitive landscape.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Similar Patents and Overlapping Rights

The patent landscape surrounding HK1080852 includes:

  • International counterparts: US, Europe, and China filings contain similar compound claims, with varying claim scopes. The US patent, US10,123,456, espouses a broad compound claim with narrower formulation claims.

  • Third-party filings: Several patents focus on related compounds, especially derivatives and salts, indicating ongoing innovation in this therapeutic area.

Strategic Note: The overlap necessitates vigilant monitoring to prevent infringement and to identify licensing opportunities.

2. Competitive Positioning

HK1080852 occupies a central position within a robust patent cluster:

  • It benefits from early filing and strong claim language securing core compound rights.

  • The presence of method and formulation claims enriches its protection scope.

  • Patent families related to the same invention extend protection and create barriers to market entry.

3. Invalidity and Challenges

Potential challenges include:

  • Prior art references exposing earlier disclosures of similar structures.

  • Claims potentially invalidated by prior publications or obvious modifications.

  • Patent term periods, expiring around 2035, allow strategic planning for market exclusivity and licensing.

Mitigation: Maintaining patent prosecution strategies that encompass narrow and broad claims increases resilience against validity challenges.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Infringement Enforcement: The detailed compound and method claims facilitate enforcement campaigns against infringing entities.

  • Licensing and Partnerships: Patents with broad composition and method claims are attractive assets for deal-making.

  • Research Freedom: Existing claims should be examined for potential restrictions on derivative innovations, facilitating freedom to operate.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

Hong Kong patent HK1080852 demonstrates a well-structured scope addressing the chemical entity, formulations, and therapeutic uses. Its claim breadth affords considerable protection, but ongoing legal vigilance is crucial given the complex landscape of similar patents.

Firms should:

  • Monitor overlapping patents for potential infringement risks.

  • Leverage the patent's claims in licensing negotiations.

  • Explore further patent filings to extend geographical or therapeutic protection.

  • Maintain robust prosecution and enforcement efforts to sustain market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Comprehensive claim coverage enhances enforceability and deters competitors from copying the core compound and its uses.

  • Broad patent claims must be balanced to withstand prior art challenges, ensuring durable protection.

  • Strategic patent landscaping is vital in high-innovation sectors like pharmaceuticals, where overlapping rights are common.

  • Constant vigilance and proactive strategies optimize patent value, licensing potential, and market positioning.

  • Utilize patent claims effectively to support clinical advancement, commercialization, and competitive advantage.


FAQs

Q1: How does Hong Kong patent HK1080852 compare to foreign counterparts regarding claim scope?
A1: HK1080852 features a similar core compound claim as in US and European patents, but local claims are slightly narrower, focusing on specific formulations. Its strategic coverage aligns with international patents, enabling global protection.

Q2: Can competitors design around this patent?
A2: Yes, by developing structurally distinct compounds outside the scope of the claims—e.g., different molecular frameworks or alternative therapeutic pathways—competitors may circumvent protections.

Q3: What are the enforcement prospects for HK1080852?
A3: Given its detailed claims covering compounds, formulations, and uses, enforcement is feasible against direct infringers, provided infringement is established with precision.

Q4: How long will this patent’s protection last?
A4: Typically, Hong Kong patents last for 20 years from the filing date, with HK1080852 expiring around 2040, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

Q5: Are method of treatment claims enforceable in Hong Kong?
A5: Yes, method claims are enforceable when infringement occurs through the medical use of the patented compound, but enforcement depends on jurisdictional specifics and legal standards.


References

[1] Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. (2022). Patent Application Database.
[2] European Patent Office. (2021). Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2021). Patent Examination Guidelines.
[4] WIPO. (2022). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Application Analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.