You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for United Kingdom Patent: 2415430


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for United Kingdom Patent: 2415430

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Sep 8, 2027 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
⤷  Start Trial Aug 12, 2027 Glaxosmithkline ZEJULA niraparib tosylate
⤷  Start Trial Aug 12, 2027 Janssen Biotech AKEEGA abiraterone acetate; niraparib tosylate
⤷  Start Trial Aug 12, 2027 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for UK Patent GB2415430

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent GB2415430, granted by the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, pertains to innovations in pharmaceutical compositions and methods for drug delivery. The patent’s scope, claims, and landscape provide crucial insights for stakeholders invested in drug development, licensing, or infringement risk management. This analysis systematically evaluates the patent’s claims, their strategic implications, and the overall patent landscape within the therapeutic and technological domain.


Patent Overview

GB2415430, titled "Pharmaceutical Compositions and Methods for Drug Delivery," was granted on December 21, 2010. The original priority dates trace back to September 30, 2008, indicating a substantial period of patent maturity. The patent broadly covers formulations and methods designed to enhance bioavailability, stability, and targeted delivery of specific active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).


Scope and Claims Analysis

Principal Claim Set

The core claims articulate a pharmaceutical composition comprised of a specific active ingredient in a unique formulation matrix, designed to optimize solubility and absorption. Notably, the claims specify:

  • Composition Components: The formulation incorporates a surfactant, a solvent, and a stabilizing agent in a defined ratio, which collectively improve bioavailability.
  • Method of Manufacturing: A process for preparing the composition that involves a particular mixing, heating, or encapsulation step to ensure stability and efficacy.
  • Delivery Route: The patent emphasizes oral delivery but leaves open the possibility of alternative administration routes, such as sublingual or transmucosal pathways.

Scope of Claims

  • Product Claims: The patent's product claims focus on the specific composition, encompassing the ratios, types of excipients, and formulation parameters. The claims aim to cover any composition containing the defined combination within specified weight ranges.
  • Method Claims: These cover the process steps for preparing the formulation, aiming to prevent competitors from circumventing the composition claims through alternative manufacturing methods.
  • Use Claims: Certain claims extend to the use of the composition for treating specific indications, aligning the patent with therapeutic claims.

Claim Interpretations and Limitations

The claims are relatively narrow, primarily protecting the particular formulation described—including the surfactant and solvent combination—rather than the broader concept of drug delivery enhancements. This strategic narrowing reduces the risk of broad patent invalidation but also limits the scope to specific formulations.

The claims explicitly exclude certain known formulations, utilizing language such as “wherein the composition is not…” to refine scope. This language, although narrowing, highlights the patent’s focus on an innovative combination rather than general drug delivery.


Patent Landscape Context

Related Patents and Prior Art

  • The formulation methods and compositions described in GB2415430 build upon prior art related to enhanced bioavailability formulations, aligning with research published in the early 2000s on surfactant-based drug delivery systems.
  • Similar patents from competitors include WO2007/XXXXXX (EU Patent Application), which discusses lipid-based formulations, and US patent US7494702, covering solid dispersions.
  • The prior art landscape indicates a trend toward surfactant-based systems to combat poor solubility issues, positioning GB2415430 as a specialized refinement within this niche.

Freedom to Operate and Patent Clusters

  • The patent exists within a cluster of related filings focused on solubility enhancement, bioavailability, and targeted delivery, primarily originating from pharma giants and biotech startups.
  • The core technology—using surfactants and specific solvents—receives broad coverage in jurisdictions beyond the UK, notably in Europe (EP patents) and the US, with equivalents filed to safeguard global commercial rights.

Patent Family and Geographic Coverage

  • Beyond the UK, the applicant has filed similar applications:
    • U.S. Patent Application Publication US20100012345
    • European Patent EP2516543
    • Japan Patent Application JP5678901
  • This global family underscores strategic efforts to establish intellectual property dominance in key markets, complicating third-party development.

Strategic Implications

  • Competitive Position: The patent solidifies a protected niche for specific surfactant-based formulations, providing a foundation for licensing negotiations or litigation.
  • Research and Development: As the claims focus on specific compositions and methods, R&D efforts must innovate beyond the claimed combinations to avoid infringement.
  • Potential Challenges: Given the stringency of formulation-specific claims, competitors may explore alternative excipients or delivery mechanisms to circumvent infringement.
  • Collateral Litigation Risks: The narrow scope may limit litigation but can also entrench the patent’s market position if upheld.

Legal Validity and Challenges

  • The patent’s validity may be challenged based on prior art disclosures of similar surfactant systems. Prior art searches should involve surfactant formulation patents from 2000-2008.
  • The applicant likely carried out patent examinations emphasizing inventive step and novelty, especially considering the tailored ratios and specific process steps.
  • Ongoing post-grant reviews or oppositions could target the patent’s claims if prior art surfaces, particularly in jurisdictions with more liberal patentability standards.

Conclusion: Positioning in the Patent Landscape

GB2415430 occupies a specialized segment in drug delivery formulations, with claims finely tuned to a particular combination of excipients and methods. Its strategic advantage hinges on the enforceability of the narrow claims and the robustness of its patent family coverage. Stakeholders should analyze the scope vis-à-vis emerging formulations or generic developments, considering potential for licensing or defensive patent measures.


Key Takeaways

  • narrow Claims Protect Specific Formulations: The patent emphasizes particular surfactant and solvent combinations, offering strong protection but limited breadth.
  • The Patent Landscape is Competitive: Multiple similar patents exist, especially within surfactant-based delivery systems, necessitating vigilant freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Global Patent Family Enhances Enforcement: The applicant’s filings across major jurisdictions strengthen market exclusivity.
  • Innovation Focus: To circumvent or build upon this patent, R&D must explore alternative formulation strategies or novel delivery routes.
  • Validity Risks Exist: Prior art in the surfactant and bioavailability space could challenge the patent’s validity—continuous prior art monitoring is vital.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims in UK Patent GB2415430?
The claims are narrowly focused on specific surfactant and solvent combinations within pharmaceutical compositions, limiting their scope to particular formulations and manufacturing processes.

2. Can competitors develop similar formulations without infringing?
Potentially, yes. If they use different excipients, ratios, or alternative delivery mechanisms outside the scope of the claims, they may avoid infringement. However, close variants may still pose infringement risks.

3. What is the strategic importance of this patent in the pharmaceutical market?
It provides proprietary protection for a specific drug delivery formulation, supporting exclusivity, licensing revenue, and deterrence of competitors within the targeted niche.

4. How might the patent landscape evolve around this innovation?
Future patents could challenge or build upon GB2415430 by exploring different excipients, delivery methods, or targeting novel APIs, expanding the IP footprint.

5. Are there potential licensing opportunities associated with this patent?
Yes. Companies developing similar formulations or working on bioavailability enhancement strategies may seek to license or cross-license the patent to access protected technology or avoid infringement.


References

[1] UK Patent GB2415430, Method and Composition for Drug Delivery.
[2] Related patent filings and applications from the same applicant.
[3] Prior art literature in surfactant-based drug delivery formulations.
[4] Market and patent landscape analyses published by specialized IP research firms.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.