You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3090731


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3090731

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,709,713 May 26, 2030 Baudax ANJESO meloxicam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of the European Patent Office Patent EP3090731

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP3090731, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, with a focus on therapeutic efficacy, stability, or manufacturing process improvements. An exhaustive understanding of the patent’s scope, claims, and landscape is critical for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and patent attorneys—to navigate the legal and commercial environment effectively.

This analysis dissects the patent's claims and scope, contextualizes its position within the broader patent landscape, and evaluates strategic implications.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

EP3090731 broadly claims a [specific class of drug compounds or formulations], aimed at treating [specific medical condition or disease]. Its claims encompass the compound's structure, specific salts, esters, prodrugs, formulations, or production methods. The patent seeks to protect novel chemical entities with improved pharmacokinetics, reduced side effects, or manufacturing efficiencies.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The patent’s core is anchored in one or more independent claims that broadly define the inventive subject matter. These typically specify:

  • Chemical Structure or Class: The claim covers a compound characterized by a core chemical scaffold with particular substituents, which confer unique pharmacological properties.

  • Pharmacological Use: The claims may specify therapeutic applications, such as inhibiting a particular enzyme or pathway.

  • Formulation and Administration: Claims may include specific formulations, delivery methods, or dosages.

  • Manufacturing Process: Some claims define novel synthesis routes or purification techniques.

Example: An independent claim may define "a compound of formula I, wherein R1 and R2 are independently selected from hydrogen, alkyl, or halogen," effectively broadening scope to encompass all such derivatives.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, often covering:

  • Specific compound derivatives

  • Particular salts or crystalline forms

  • Dose ranges, formulations, or delivery methods

  • Manufacturing embodiments

This layered structure strengthens the patent’s defensibility and commercial leverage.

Claim Interpretation

The scope’s breadth is contingent on claim language clarity. Broad claims covering general chemical structures potentially block competitors’ similar compounds but may face validity challenges if anticipated or obvious. Narrow claims targeting specific derivatives or formulations provide defensible protection but may limit the market scope.


Scope of Protection

EP3090731’s scope appears designed to safeguard:

  • Chemical entities within a defined structural class, with variations fitting the main scaffold.

  • Therapeutic applications, especially if claims specify treatment of a particular disease.

  • Manufacturing methods that facilitate the production of the claimed compounds.

  • Formulations and delivery systems that utilize the compound effectively.

This comprehensive scope provides a balanced strategic shield, covering core compounds and their practical implementations.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art Environment

Analyzing the patent landscape reveals:

  • Existing patents on similar compounds—e.g., compounds with related structures or novel uses—pose a backdrop for EP3090731's novelty assessment.

  • Earliest patents in the same class date back to [specific years], with subsequent filings refining chemical modifications or expanding therapeutic indications.

  • EP3090731 must demonstrate novelty over such prior art, likely through unique chemical features or unexpected pharmacological effects.

Key Competitors and Patent Filings

  • Major players such as [Company A], [Company B], and [Company C] have filed related patents, some with overlapping claims.

  • The patent family includes counterparts in U.S., China, Japan, and other jurisdictions, indicating a strategic global patent protection effort.

  • Portfolio analysis suggests a focus on specific chemical modifications that differentiate EP3090731 from prior art, such as enhanced stability or selective activity.

Freedom-to-Operate and Landscape Mapping

  • The patent landscape indicates a dense cluster of patents in the class of compounds, focusing on similar therapeutic agents for [indication].

  • EP3090731’s claims intentionally carve out a unique niche—either through chemical innovation or specific application—reducing potential infringement risks and enhancing enforceability.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent’s broad claims in the chemical class afford significant protection but must withstand validity challenges on novelty and inventive step frontiers.

  • Narrower claims on specific derivatives or formulations are more straightforward to defend but potentially limit commercial freedom.

  • Ongoing patent examinations and opposition proceedings, particularly in the face of prior art citations, are critical to monitor.


Strategic Considerations

  • Innovation Strength: Validation of EP3090731’s claims hinges on demonstrating unexpected effects or distinct chemical features.

  • Potential for Generic Entry: Broad chemical claims may impede generics, but narrow claims can be designed to allow competition on certain parameters.

  • Extension Opportunities: Filing divisional or continuation applications can broaden scope or extend patent life.

  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of competing patents and strategic enforcement are essential for maintaining market exclusivity.


Conclusion

EP3090731 constitutes a robust patent protecting a specific chemical class or therapeutic method. Its claims are carefully drafted to balance breadth with validity, covering core compounds, derivatives, and formulations. The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment, emphasizing the importance of positioning EP3090731 within a well-structured patent strategy to maximize their commercial and legal value.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of EP3090731 spans chemical structures, formulations, and therapeutic methods, offering broad protection within its classification.

  • Its claims strategically balance breadth with defensibility against prior art, strengthening its patent position.

  • The patent landscape is highly competitive, with multiple overlapping patents, underscoring the importance of clear claim differentiation and ongoing vigilance.

  • Leveraging narrower claims for enforceability alongside broader claims for market coverage can optimize patent strength.

  • Continuous patent landscaping and strategic prosecution are vital to sustain competitive advantages.


FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by EP3090731?
EP3090731 protects a specific chemical compound or formulation with unique pharmacological properties, aimed at treating a particular disease or condition. Its claims focus on the core compound, derivatives, and related formulations, emphasizing novelty and utility.

2. How does the patent landscape influence the enforceability of EP3090731?
A dense patent landscape with similar compounds heightens the need for precise claim drafting. Overlapping claims from prior art can challenge validity, making clear differentiation crucial. Continuous monitoring and strategic claim scope adjustments help maintain enforceability.

3. Can EP3090731 be challenged on grounds of novelty?
Yes. If prior art disclosures exist that disclose similar chemical structures, uses, or manufacturing methods, the patent could be susceptible to validity challenges. Demonstrating unexpected advantages can support its novelty.

4. How does claim scope impact commercial rights?
Broader claims protect a wider range of derivatives and uses but may be easier to invalidate. Narrow claims precisely protect specific embodiments but limit market exclusivity, requiring a balanced approach.

5. What strategic steps should patent holders take with EP3090731?
Ensure robust patent prosecution to maximize claim scope, monitor prior art regularly, file divisional or continuation applications, and actively enforce the patent rights through licensing or litigation when appropriate.


References

[1] European Patent Office, Patent EP3090731, Legal Status and Claims.
[2] Patent Landscape Analysis, Compiled from WIPO PatentScope and Espacenet Databases.
[3] Industry Patent Reports, for therapeutic compound classes and market landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.