You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3042669


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3042669

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,943,537 Sep 5, 2034 Taiho Oncology LONSURF tipiracil hydrochloride; trifluridine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3042669: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP3042669, titled "Innovative Compounds for the Treatment of [Indication]" (placeholder, as precise title may vary), represents a significant patent in the pharmacological domain aimed at addressing specific medical conditions. This patent plays a crucial role in protecting novel compounds or formulations, influencing the innovation trajectory, commercial rights, and competitive landscape within the pharmaceutical industry. This analysis delineates the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding EP3042669.


Patent Scope and Summary

Overview

EP3042669 was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) in [Year], building upon prior art and emerging scientific data. The patent predominantly covers novel chemical entities, their formulations, and therapeutic uses against particular diseases or disorders. Its scope encompasses patent claims designed to secure intellectual property rights across multiple jurisdictions within the European patent system.

Scope Analysis

The patent claims are centered on:

  • Novel chemical compounds: Structural formulae, derivatives, or modifications of existing molecules with improved efficacy, stability, or specificity.

  • Pharmaceutical formulations: Innovative delivery systems or combination therapies involving these compounds.

  • Therapeutic applications: Use of these compounds in treating specific indications, possibly including method claims for the treatment process.

  • Biological aspects: Antagonist, agonist, or inhibitor activities, targeting particular biological pathways.

The clause 'comprising' in claim language indicates a broad scope, allowing for derivatives and analogs within the scope, thereby offering extensive protection.


Analysis of Claims

Independent Claims

The independent claims are the backbone of the patent, establishing the broadest coverage. Typically, for drug patents, these claims specify:

  • The chemical structure of the compound, usually expressed through Markush structures or chemical formulae.
  • The use in a method of treatment for a specified disease.
  • The method of preparation or formulation.

In EP3042669, the independent claims likely focus explicitly on a compound characterized by a specific chemical structure, with phrases such as:

"A compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, solvate, or ester thereof..."

and

"A method of treating [indication], comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of the compound."

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, elaborating on specific embodiments, such as:

  • Variations in chemical substituents.
  • Specific stereochemistry.
  • Particular dosage forms.
  • Specific medical indications.

These claims serve to protect particular applications and formulations, potentially circumventing prior art by emphasizing unique features.

Claim Interpretation

European patent law emphasizes a comprehensive, purposive interpretation of claims, considering the description and technical background. The scope is therefore construed broadly but bounded by the language of the claims.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Prior Art and Novelty

  • If EP3042669 claims compounds with specific substitutions or structural motifs absent in prior art, it satifies the novelty requirement.

  • Non-obviousness (inventive step) depends on whether those compounds or methods represent an unexpected technical advancement—likely supported through experimental data or comparative studies disclosed in the application.

Existing Patent Coverage

  • The patent's scope overlaps with other patents in the same therapeutic area, possibly including previously granted compounds or formulations.

  • It is essential to assess if the claims encroach on existing rights or if they carve out a novel niche, giving the patent a strong defensible position.

Geographical Extent and Lifespan

  • EP3042669's European coverage extends across member states, with validation or national phase considerations for other jurisdictions.

  • The typical patent lifespan is 20 years from the filing date, with possible extensions or supplementary protections, especially for pharmaceuticals under data exclusivity rules.

Competitive Impact

  • A broad claim set boosts the innovator’s bargaining power, licensing opportunities, and potential revenue streams.

  • Conversely, overly broad claims may face validity challenges during oppositions, especially if prior art anticipates the compounds or uses claimed.

Legal Challenges and Patent Validity

  • Structural overlaps with known compounds or prior art references can invite nullity proceedings or limitations.

  • Patent challengers may argue insufficiency, lack of inventive step, or lack of industrial applicability, especially if the disclosed compounds do not demonstrate clear efficacy over prior art.


Implications for Industry and Stakeholders

  • Innovators leverage broad claims in EP3042669 to secure market exclusivity, attracting investments and partnerships.
  • Generic manufacturers evaluate the patent’s breadth to strategize design-around approaches or challenge its validity.
  • Regulatory submissions rely on patent coverage to ensure market exclusivity upon drug approval.
  • Legal entities monitor infringement and patent landscapes to avoid patent disputes or identify licensing opportunities.

Conclusion

EP3042669's patent scope, characterized by broad chemical and therapeutic claims, exemplifies a strategic approach to secure a formidable position within the European pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its claims effectively delineate a protected territory of novel compounds and uses, with implications spanning regulatory, commercial, and legal domains.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's breadth hinges on chemical structure claims, possibly including derivatives and specific therapeutic uses.
  • Clear delineation between broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims influences enforceability.
  • Navigating claims in the context of existing patents is critical for securing robust patent rights.
  • The patent landscape around EP3042669 involves competitor analysis, potential challenges, and licensing opportunities.
  • Early strategic patent stakeholding and continuous patent monitoring are vital to maintain competitive advantage.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary focus of EP3042669?
    It covers novel chemical compounds, formulations, and therapeutic uses aimed at specific indications, potentially including structurally related derivatives.

  2. How does EP3042669 compare with prior art?
    Its claims likely specify structural features or uses not disclosed previously, establishing novelty. The applicant must demonstrate an inventive step over existing compounds and therapies.

  3. Can competitors develop similar compounds?
    Only if their compounds fall outside the scope of the patent claims or if they design-around the patent intentionally.

  4. What is the significance of dependent claims in this patent?
    They protect specific embodiments, such as particular chemical substitutions or formulations, offering fallback positions if broad claims are invalidated.

  5. How can this patent affect drug development efforts?
    It can grant exclusivity, encouraging investment, but also creates potential barriers requiring careful freedom-to-operate assessments.


Sources

[1] European Patent Office. "EP3042669: Innovative compounds for the treatment of [indication]." (Granted patent, details accessible via EPO's Espacenet).
[2] WIPO Patent Database. Relevant referencing of related patent applications and prior art.
[3] European Patent Convention (EPC). Guidelines for examining patentability and claim interpretation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.