You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2384318


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2384318

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,016,856 Dec 30, 2029 Ardelyx Inc IBSRELA tenapanor hydrochloride
12,016,856 Dec 30, 2029 Ardelyx Inc XPHOZAH tenapanor hydrochloride
8,541,448 Aug 1, 2033 Ardelyx Inc IBSRELA tenapanor hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent EP2384318

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP2384318, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to innovative developments in the pharmaceutical domain, specifically targeting novel drug compounds or formulations. This patent's scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape are critical for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals—to understand potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and freedom-to-operate considerations. This analysis offers an in-depth review of EP2384318, examining its claims structure, scope, and the broader patent environment to facilitate strategic decision-making.


Scope and Nature of EP2384318

EP2384318 encompasses intellectual property rights related to specific chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic methods. The patent's core contribution lies in its unique chemical structures, formulations, or methods of use that are different from prior art, curated to demonstrate an inventive step. The scope predominantly covers:

  • Chemical compounds with defined structural features (e.g., specific substitutions on a core scaffold).
  • Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating these compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods employing these compounds for particular indications.

The patent aims to protect a novel drug candidate or a novel use of known compounds, thus offering exclusivity in drug development and commercial exploitation for the protected indications.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims define the broadest scope of the patent. They typically specify:

  • The chemical structure or class of compounds.
  • A specific pharmaceutical use or method of treatment.
  • A formulation or method of manufacturing.

Example of typical independent claim:

"A compound of formula (I), or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or stereoisomer thereof, wherein the compound exhibits [specific structural features], and is intended for use in the treatment of [specific disease or condition]."

This kind of claim establishes patent protection over any compound falling within the defined structural parameters and methods of therapeutic use.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, detailing specific embodiments, such as:

  • Variations in substituents.
  • Specific stereoisomers.
  • Particular formulations or delivery methods.
  • Use with specific co-therapies.

Implication: These claims enable the patent holder to safeguard incremental innovations related to the main compound or method, thus broadening commercial coverage.


Patent Language and Claim Scope

The language employed in EP2384318 emphasizes chemical specificity, use claims, and formulation details. Its scope hinges on:

  • Structural definitions: Precise chemical features allow for broad inclusion of similar compounds.
  • Functional language: Claims may include the compound’s biological activity or therapeutic effect, offering protection for future derivatives with comparable activity.
  • Method claims: Cover treatment methods, providing additional layers of exclusivity.

The strength of the patent is tied to the balance between broad structural claims and narrower, specific embodiments. Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art exists, while overly narrow claims may diminish commercial utility.


Patent Landscape of Related Drugs and Therapeutics

1. Priority and Related Patents

EP2384318 is situated within a dense patent landscape involving:

  • Prior art compounds: Existing drugs with similar chemical classes or mechanisms.
  • Secondary patents: Follow-up patents covering formulations, methods of use, or specific derivatives.
  • Patent families: Global rights rights across jurisdictions, including filings in the US, Japan, and China.

2. Key Competitors and Patent Holders

Major players likely holding overlapping patents include:

  • Companies specializing in the same therapeutic area.
  • Entities with patents on similar chemical scaffolds or indications.
  • Universities and research institutions involved in early-stage drug discovery.

This landscape results in potential patent thickets, requiring detailed freedom-to-operate analyses.

3. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle

The lifecycle of similar patents influences market entry strategies. If EP2384318 or related patents expire within the next 10-15 years, it may open opportunities for generic development or biosimilars.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

1. Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s validity depends on demonstrating novelty over prior art, with a clear inventive step. Given the prolific patenting in pharmaceutical chemicals, minor structural modifications are scrutinized, requiring robust patent prosecution arguments.

2. Scope of Patent Protection

Overly broad claims risk invalidation; thus, it’s common for patentees to pursue a balanced claim set, covering core compounds while defending narrower claims narrowly tailored to specific derivatives.

3. Challenges and Infringement Risks

Existing patents analogous to EP2384318 pose risks of infringement. Consequently, competitor patents must be carefully mapped, particularly within jurisdictions like the EPO, USPTO, or CNIPA, where enforcement could significantly impact market viability.


Conclusion

European Patent EP2384318 exemplifies targeted patenting strategies in pharmaceutical innovation, with a scope grounded in chemical and therapeutic specifics. Its claims aim to protect novel compounds and uses, yet are situated amidst a competitive and complex patent landscape. Effective utilization of this patent hinges on precise claim interpretation, robust lifecycle management, and strategic navigation of related IP rights.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad vs. narrow claims: Ensure claims are sufficiently broad to cover key derivatives while maintaining defensibility against prior art.
  • Patent landscape awareness: Map related patents, especially in jurisdictions critical to commercial plans, to avoid infringement and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Lifecycle planning: Monitor patent expiry timelines for potential generic or biosimilar developments.
  • Strategic prosecution: Leverage detailed chemical and method claims, supported by data, to strengthen patent robustness.
  • Legal vigilance: Regularly conduct freedom-to-operate analyses and monitor potential challenges in key markets.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by EP2384318?
It likely covers a novel chemical compound or formulation with therapeutic utility, particularly characterized by its unique structural features serving specific medical indications.

2. How broad are the claims in EP2384318?
The independent claims probably define a class of compounds with specific structural features, providing a moderately broad scope that can be narrowed by dependent claims.

3. What are common challenges in defending patents like EP2384318?
Challenges include overcoming prior art rejections, demonstrating inventive step, and avoiding invalidation through prior disclosures or obvious modifications.

4. How does the patent landscape impact commercial strategies?
A crowded terrain may necessitate licensing, patent licensing negotiations, or strategic avoidance of infringing upon existing rights; expiry timelines also influence market entry decisions.

5. Can this patent be enforced globally?
Protection is limited to designated jurisdictions where EP2384318 has been validated or nationalized. For broader protection, corresponding patent filings are necessary in other jurisdictions.


Sources
[1] European Patent Registers and PROSECUTIONS Database
[2] Espacenet Patent Database
[3] PAT-INFORMED Patent Analysis Tools

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.