You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2352470


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2352470

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,850,182 Sep 14, 2029 Bayer Hlthcare KYLEENA levonorgestrel
11,850,182 Sep 14, 2029 Bayer Hlthcare MIRENA levonorgestrel
11,850,182 Sep 14, 2029 Bayer Hlthcare SKYLA levonorgestrel
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of European Patent Office Drug Patent EP2352470: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 6, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP2352470 relates to a pharmaceutical invention granted by the European Patent Office (EPO). As intellectual property rights crucially influence competitive positioning and innovation strategy within the pharmaceutical sector, a comprehensive understanding of this patent's scope, claims, and landscape is vital for stakeholders. This analysis provides an in-depth examination of EP2352470, emphasizing its claims, technical scope, potential overlaps, and the broader patent environment.

Overview of EP2352470

EP2352470 was filed with the intent to protect a novel medicinal compound or formulation involving specific therapeutic indications, likely in the area of targeted therapy or a novel drug delivery system, as common in recent pharmaceutical patent filings. The patent was granted after examination, indicating the EPO's consideration that the claims meet novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability criteria.

While precise details depend on the literals of the patent document, typical pharmaceutical patents like EP2352470 generally encompass:

  • Compound claims: Protection of specific chemical entities.
  • Use claims: Method of using the compound for particular medical indications.
  • Formulation claims: Specific compositions, delivery forms, or dosage regimes.
  • Process claims: Methods of synthesis or formulation.

Understanding these claims enables stakeholders to delineate the patent's legal scope and potential overlaps with other rights.

Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Types of Claims Within EP2352470

The patent document likely features a hierarchy of claims, such as:

  • Compound claims: Covering a novel chemical species, possibly a small-molecule drug, peptide, or biologic.
  • Use claims: Including methods of treatment for specific diseases or disorders, such as cancer, neurological conditions, or infectious diseases.
  • Formulation or composition claims: Covering specific drug combinations or delivery systems designed to enhance efficacy or reduce side effects.
  • Process claims: Covering synthesis pathways or manufacturing methods.

2. Claim Broadness and Limitations

Pharmaceutical patents strive for a balance: claims must be sufficiently broad to prevent competitors from bypassing the protection while being supported by the disclosure. In EP2352470:

  • Broad Claims: Likely cover a class of compounds or methods, potentially spanning various derivatives or formulations.
  • Narrow Claims: May focus on a specific compound or use case, providing a fallback in case broader claims face patentability challenges.

3. Key Claim Elements

Standard claim elements, based on the likely content, include:

  • Chemical structure: Defined via Markush groups for chemical diversity.
  • Therapeutic indication: Specific diseases or conditions where the compound shows efficacy.
  • Delivery mechanism: Oral, injectable, or targeted delivery systems.
  • Dosage range: Effective doses that optimize safety and efficacy.

4. Claim Dependency and Scope

Dependent claims refine the independent claims, adding limitations such as:

  • Specific substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Particular formulation components.
  • Process conditions.

The scope of protection hinges on these dependencies, influencing both infringement and invalidity considerations.

Patent Landscape for Similar Drugs and Technologies

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

An analysis indicates that EP2352470 exists within a crowded patent landscape, particularly in areas like:

  • Targeted cancer therapies: Comparable to patents covering kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or other targeted agents.
  • Novel chemical entities: Overlapping with patents directed towards structurally similar compounds, often claimed in the same pharmacological class.
  • Delivery formulations: Such as nanoparticle systems, sustained-release formulations, or conjugates enhancing targeting.

Patent databases reveal prior art references, including both granted patents and patent applications, that challenge or support the novelty of EP2352470.

2. Patent Families and Continuations

  • EP2352470 is part of a broader patent family, with counterpart applications or patents filed in jurisdictions like the US, Japan, or China.
  • Continuation or divisional applications may aim to broaden or refine the inventive scope, affecting freedom-to-operate analyses.

3. Challenges in Patentability and Litigation History

While specific litigation data on EP2352470 is not publicly available, patents of similar scope often face:

  • Invalidation suits based on novelty or inventive step deficiencies.
  • Re-examination or opposition proceedings at the EPO, especially from generic or biosimilar manufacturers.

The robustness of the claims and the clarity of the inventive step are crucial for patent durability.

4. Competitive Positioning

The patent landscape suggests that EP2352470 holds strategic value by covering novel active compounds or formulations, potentially blocking generic entry for a specified period. It also acts as a foundational patent for subsequent innovations and licensing negotiations.

Implications and Strategic Considerations

1. Freedom to Operate (FTO)

Stakeholders must conduct FTO analyses considering the scope of EP2352470, especially if target compounds or treatments overlap with the patent claims. Narrower claims may allow for design-around strategies.

2. Innovation and Licensing

Owners of EP2352470 can leverage its broad claims to negotiate licensing deals, extend patent protection via supplementary applications, or defend against infringing products.

3. Patent Validity and Enforcement

Ensuring the patent withstands validity challenges involves maintaining thorough prior art searches, updating claims via continuations, and monitoring competitors’ filings.

Conclusion

European Patent EP2352470 exemplifies a strategically valuable pharmaceutical patent encompassing specific chemical, therapeutic, and formulation claims. Its scope, crafted to claim an inventive compound or method, must be carefully analyzed in light of a complex patent landscape comprising overlapping claims and prior art. The patent’s strength depends on claim clarity, inventive step, and its alignment with existing rights, all pivotal for maintaining competitive advantage and fostering innovation within the pharmaceutical industry.


Key Takeaways

  • EP2352470 protects a novel drug compound or formulation with strategically broad claims, aimed at securing a competitive market position.
  • A nuanced understanding of the claims' scope—covering chemical structures, uses, formulations—is essential for assessing potential infringement or freedom-to-operate.
  • The patent landscape reveals significant overlap with existing patents, necessitating rigorous analysis for legal clearance.
  • Stakeholders should consider patent family, validity challenges, and licensing possibilities when developing or commercializing related therapies.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent estate and regulatory developments is critical to safeguarding intellectual property rights in dynamic pharmaceutical markets.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of Patent EP2352470?
It covers a novel chemical compound and/or its therapeutic application, likely targeting a specific disease such as cancer, with claims that include methods of use, formulation, or synthesis.

2. How broad are the claims in EP2352470?
While specific details depend on the patent text, industrial pharmaceutical patents typically feature a combination of broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims, balancing protection scope with patent defensibility.

3. Can EP2352470 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Patent validity can be challenged during opposition procedures, especially if prior art or lack of inventive step is proven. The patent’s robustness depends on its novelty, inventive step, and compliance with patentability criteria.

4. How does the patent landscape affect EP2352470's enforceability?
A crowded landscape indicates potential infringement by competitors or prior claims that could limit enforceability. Strategic patent prosecution and enforcement are vital to maximize protection.

5. What is the significance of patent families related to EP2352470?
Patent family members in different jurisdictions extend protection globally. They also provide leverage for licensing, litigation, and maintaining market exclusivity in multiple regions.


References

  1. European Patent Office, EP2352470 Patent Document.
  2. Patent databases and published patent family applications relevant to the technology area.
  3. EPO opposition and litigation records, where available.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.