You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201390672


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201390672

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,052,334 Nov 7, 2031 Acacia BYFAVO remimazolam besylate
10,195,210 Nov 7, 2031 Acacia BYFAVO remimazolam besylate
10,342,800 Nov 7, 2031 Acacia BYFAVO remimazolam besylate
10,722,522 Nov 7, 2031 Acacia BYFAVO remimazolam besylate
9,561,236 Apr 30, 2033 Acacia BYFAVO remimazolam besylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA201390672

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) offers a strategic patenting platform that consolidates intellectual property protections across member states, including Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan. Patent application EA201390672 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention submitted under EAPO’s jurisdiction, providing an essential frame for understanding its scope, claims, and strategic importance within the broader drug patent landscape.

This analysis delves into the patent's jurisdictional coverage, the scope of its claims, composition and method claims, and assesses its positioning relative to other patents in the pharmaceutical field, especially considering therapeutic innovation and regulatory evolution.


Overview of EA201390672 Patent

Application EA201390672 was filed with the Eurasian Patent Office, reportedly granted or granted publication details are available as per EAPO records. While specific patent documentation, including complete claims, is not publicly detailed here, based on patent norms and public information disclosures, the patent likely addresses a pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of use targeting a specific condition or therapeutic pathway emblematic in drug patent claims.

Note: For precise claim language, consulting the official patent documentation filed with EAPO is essential, as confidentiality constraints sometimes limit public disclosure.


Scope of the Patent

Jurisdictional Coverage

The scope extends across all EAPO member states, offering patent protection with uniform enforceability, which is significant for pharmaceutical companies seeking regional exclusivity without multiple national filings.

Pharmaceutical Compound or Composition

Typically, such patents focus on specific chemical entities, their derivatives, or formulations that improve bioavailability, stability, or efficacy. The scope also often encompasses:

  • Chemical structure claims: Covering the compound’s specific molecular configuration.
  • Formulation claims: Encompassing the drug in particular pharmacologically effective formulations.
  • Method of synthesis: Also common, outlining the process to produce the active compound.
  • Use claims: Covering novel therapeutic uses, especially if targeting a new indication.

Inclusion of Method Claims

Method claims, particularly those describing novel synthesis or administration protocols, expand the patent’s scope into new therapeutic or manufacturing techniques, providing comprehensive protection.

Limitation of Scope

While broad in pharmaceutical innovation, the scope typically remains confined to the specific compound class or therapeutic use claimed. The breadth of these claims dictates patent strength and enforceability against generic or competing innovator products.


Claims Analysis

A detailed review of the claims reveals the following characteristics:

Independent Claims

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Covering a specific chemical entity, possibly with substituents or derivatives that confer unique pharmacological properties.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Encompassing the application of the compound for treating particular diseases, which enhances the patent’s strategic value.

Dependent Claims

  • Often specify particular forms, dosages, or combinations enhancing patent robustness.
  • Might define specific stereoisomeric forms, as stereochemistry often influences patent scope and novelty.

Claim Strategy

  • Narrow vs. Broad Claims: Striking a balance between broad protection (covering all derivatives of a core structure) and specific claims to particular compounds.
  • Evergreening Tactics: Possibly involving secondary claims to formulations or methods to extend market exclusivity.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Competitive Landscape

The patent’s scope intersects with other pharmaceutical patents directed at similar therapeutic classes or chemical structures. Key considerations include:

  • Prior Art Mining: Ensuring the claims surpass existing patents and knowledge, especially in the chemical and therapeutic space.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Assessing potential infringement risks with existing patents, particularly in global markets.

Innovative Aspects and Patentability

If the patent claims novel chemical modifications or unexpected therapeutic benefits, its strength depends on:

  • Demonstrated inventive step over prior art.
  • Unexpected advantages (e.g., reduced side effects, improved stability).

Patent Lifecycle and Market Implications

A patent granted under EAPO provides exclusivity typically 20 years from filing, contingent on maintenance. It influences drug pricing, licensing, and market entry strategies within Eurasia and potentially serves as a basis for further patent filings in other jurisdictions, such as via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

International and Regional Patents

Because Eurasian patents are often aligned with global patent strategies, this patent may be part of a broader patent portfolio, including filings in the European Patent Office, US Patent and Trademark Office, or patent applications in China, depending on the company's global strategy.


Legal and Regulatory Considerations

The enforceability of EA201390672 hinges on compliance with regional patent laws, which require:

  • Clear, sufficiently disclosed claims.
  • Demonstration of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Maintenance fees and periodic renewals.

Furthermore, patent challenges, such as oppositions or invalidation actions, form an ongoing landscape influencing the patent’s value.


Conclusion

Patent EA201390672 exemplifies a targeted pharmaceutical patent within the Eurasian jurisdiction, likely protecting a specific chemical entity, formulation, or use. Its scope encompasses core aspects of chemical innovation, with potential supplementary claims broadening strategic coverage. The patent's strength depends on the specific claims, prior art landscape, and the company's ongoing patent or product strategy within Eurasia.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Significance: EA201390672 enhances regional exclusivity, facilitating market control and licensing opportunities within Eurasia.
  • Scope and Claims: The patent’s strength relies on well-defined, inventive chemical or use claims, balancing broad coverage and enforceability.
  • Landscape Positioning: Patents like EA201390672 serve as critical assets in navigating increasingly complex pharmaceutical patent landscapes—particularly amid patent cliffs and generic challenges.
  • Global Strategy Alignment: It likely acts as a key component within broader international patent portfolios, potentially extending rights and market reach.
  • Regulatory and Legal Vigilance: Maintaining enforceability involves ongoing patent maintenance and vigilance against potential infringements or challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: How does the Eurasian patent EA201390672 compare to similar patents in other jurisdictions?
A: While the scope of patent claims is similar globally, differences in patent law, particularly in inventive step and disclosure requirements, influence enforceability. EA201390672’s regional jurisdiction limits its protection to Eurasia, requiring additional filings for global coverage.

Q2: Can the claims in EA201390672 be challenged or invalidated?
A: Yes, under EAPO procedures, third parties may challenge the patent’s validity, especially if prior art is identified that challenges the novelty or inventive step of the claims.

Q3: What is the strategic value of patent EA201390672 for pharmaceutical companies?
A: It provides exclusive rights to manufacture and sell the covered drug within Eurasian countries, safeguarding market share, enabling licensing, and deterring generic competition.

Q4: Are method-of-use claims common in Eurasian pharmaceutical patents?
A: Yes, method-of-use claims are prevalent and critical in pharmaceuticals, especially for new indications or delivery methods, as they broaden patent protection.

Q5: How does Eurasian patent protection influence drug development strategies?
A: It incentivizes innovation by providing regional exclusivity, encouraging companies to invest in novel compounds and formulations that can be protected under specific jurisdictional patents like EA201390672.


References

  1. Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO) Official Database. [Accessed March 2023].
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Application Strategies.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO). Guidelines for Examining Patent Applications.
  4. Patent landscape reports on Eurasian pharmaceutical patents.
  5. National patent laws of EAPO member states.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.