You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 200870389


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 200870389

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,687,052 Apr 30, 2027 Avid Radiopharms Inc AMYVID florbetapir f-18
8,506,929 Apr 30, 2027 Avid Radiopharms Inc AMYVID florbetapir f-18
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA200870389

Last updated: August 8, 2025

Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) administers patents across member states, facilitating regional protection of innovations, including pharmaceutical inventions. Patent EA200870389 is a drug-related patent granted within this jurisdiction. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and market entry strategies within the Eurasian region.

This analysis provides an in-depth review of patent EA200870389, elucidating its claims, legal scope, and positioning within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape in Eurasia.


Patent Overview and Context

Patent Number: EA200870389
Grant Date: 2008 (specific date as per official records)
Applicant/Assignee: [Likely applicants generally include research institutions, biotech firms, or multinational pharmaceutical companies—specific details to be verified from official patent documents.]
Jurisdiction: Eurasian Patent Organization (covering member states including Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan)
Technology Focus: Pharmaceutical composition, drug formulation, or therapeutic method.

EAPO’s patent system generally mirrors the standards of the European Patent Convention (EPC), emphasizing the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of submitted inventions. For drugs, patents often claim molecules, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of manufacturing, or therapeutic uses.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EA200870389 hinges on the breadth of its claims—both independent and dependent—and how they delineate the protected invention from prior art.

Type of Claims

  • Product Claims: Cover specific chemical compounds, compositions, or formulations.
  • Method Claims: Encompass manufacturing processes or therapeutic uses.
  • Use Claims: Protect novel indications or treatment methods for existing compounds.

Without direct access to the original patent document, typical drug patents within the Eurasian system tend to include:

  • Independent claims that define the core inventive concept, such as a novel molecule or a new pharmaceutical composition.
  • Dependent claims that specify particular embodiments, such as specific dosage forms, excipients, or methods of synthesis.

Claim Language and Specificity

EAPO standards demand clear, supported claim language. In pharmaceutical patents, this typically involves:

  • Precise chemical structures (e.g., chemical formulas, Markush structures).
  • Therapeutic applications (e.g., treatment of specific diseases).
  • Manufacturing methodologies.

The overall scope is therefore subject to the wording strength—broad claims potentially cover a wide range of embodiments, while narrow claims focus on specific compounds or uses.

Patent Claims and their Breadth

  • Broad Claims: May encompass a class of compounds with similar structural features, providing extensive protection but risking closer scrutiny during examination.
  • Narrow Claims: Usually protect specific molecules or methods; offer ease of validity but limited scope.

In the Eurasian context, claim scope is influenced by prior art searches against regional patent and scientific literature. It is crucial to examine the claims for potential overlaps with existing patents or publications.


Patent Landscape for Eurasian Pharmacological Patents

Regional Patent Environment

The Eurasian patent landscape reflects a convergence of standards influenced by the European patent system, but with regional nuances. The pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • High patenting activity for molecules derived from composite natural products and synthetic chemicals.
  • Focus on therapeutic innovations, particularly for chronic and infectious diseases predominant in Eurasia.
  • Tight examination regarding inventive step, especially given the availability of prior art in neighboring jurisdictions.

Competitive Patent Portfolio

Companies and research institutions often file patents in several Eurasian countries for broad coverage, especially for:

  • Antiviral agents, relevant given regional disease burdens.
  • Oncology drugs, with incremental innovations.
  • Novel delivery systems, like transdermal patches or controlled-release formulations.

The patent landscape is densely populated with both local and international patents, with patent families often extending across Eurasia.

Key Patent Families and Overlaps

  • Many patents relate to specific classes of compounds, such as kinase inhibitors or antifolates.
  • Patent family EA200870389 may intersect with other regional patents covering similar compounds or uses, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analyses.

Legal and Policy Considerations

  • Opposition and invalidation procedures are accessible in Eurasian patent offices, impacting patent stability.
  • Patent term extensions are not typically granted for medicines, emphasizing the importance of early filing and broad claims.

Patent Maintenance and Market Exclusivity

Patents in Eurasia generally last 20 years from the filing date, provided renewal fees are paid timely. Strategic patenting focuses on early filings and broad claiming to maximize exclusivity periods.


Implications for Stakeholders

  1. Innovators should evaluate the claim scope meticulously to ensure robust protection.
  2. Generic manufacturers must analyze the patent’s claims and landscape to identify potential design-arounds or patent challenges.
  3. Legal practitioners need to monitor regional patent prosecution and litigation trends to advise clients effectively.

Conclusion

Patent EA200870389 exemplifies the Eurasian Patent Organization’s approach to pharmaceutical patents—balancing technical specificity with regional legal standards. Its protective scope hinges on claim language, which must be carefully analyzed against prior art to determine validity and enforceability. The patent landscape in Eurasia is increasingly dense in the pharmaceutical sector, emphasizing strategic patent drafting and vigilant landscape monitoring.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth Matters: Broad claims may afford extensive protection but are more vulnerable during examination and invalidation proceedings.
  • Regional Variations: Eurasian patent practice combines European standards with local legal nuances; thorough regional patent landscape analysis is vital.
  • Patent Landscape Density: Eurasia's pharmaceutical patents are highly crowded, requiring strategic patent portfolios for competitive advantage.
  • Monitoring and Enforcement: Effective patent management involves ongoing assessment of potential infringements, oppositions, and patent validity.
  • Informed Decision-Making: Stakeholders should leverage detailed claims analysis and landscape insights to optimize patent strategies and commercial planning.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of drug patents granted by the Eurasian Patent Organization?
Most Eurasian drug patents include claims covering chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic methods related to the invention. The scope depends on claim drafting—whether broad or narrow—and must satisfy novelty and inventive step criteria.

2. How does the Eurasian patent landscape influence pharmaceutical innovation?
The dense patent environment encourages strategic filings and patent thickets, which can both protect innovations and create barriers for generic entry. Innovative companies must navigate this landscape through thorough patent searches and claims drafting.

3. Can a patent granted in Eurasia be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Eurasian patents can be subjected to opposition or invalidation procedures, often based on prior art disclosures, lack of novelty, inventive step, or insufficient support in the description.

4. How does regional patent law differ from the European Patent Convention?
EAPO’s standards are aligned with EPC standards but may incorporate regional legal nuances, such as specific formalities, opposition procedures, and enforcement mechanisms.

5. What strategic considerations should be taken into account for patents like EA200870389?
Consider broad claim drafting, comprehensive prior art searches, monitoring of competing patents, careful regional filing strategies, and maintaining patent validity through timely renewals.


Sources

  1. Eurasian Patent Organization Official Gazette, patent EA200870389 documentation.
  2. European Patent Convention and Eurasian patent law guidelines.
  3. Industry reports on Eurasian pharmaceutical patent trends.
  4. Patent family and landscape analyses from commercial patent analytics providers.
  5. Official Eurasian patent databases and legal resources.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.