You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,687,052


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,687,052 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,687,052 protects AMYVID and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fifty-one patent family members in thirty-three countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,687,052
Title:Styrylpyridine derivatives and their use for binding and imaging amyloid plaques
Abstract:This invention relates to a method of imaging amyloid deposits and to styrylpyridine compounds, and methods of making radiolabeled styrylpyridine compounds useful in imaging amyloid deposits. This invention also relates to compounds, and methods of making compounds for inhibiting the aggregation of amyloid proteins to form amyloid deposits, and a method of delivering a therapeutic agent to amyloid deposits.
Inventor(s):Hank F. Kung, Mei-Ping Kung
Assignee:University of Pennsylvania Penn
Application Number:US11/727,401
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,687,052
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 7,687,052: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

United States Patent 7,687,052, titled "Process for preparing amorphous solid dispersions of drugs," issued on March 30, 2010. The patent claims a specific process for manufacturing amorphous solid dispersions, a formulation technique that improves the solubility and bioavailability of poorly soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). The process involves specific solvent systems and drying parameters. The patent landscape analysis reveals key competitors and potential infringement risks for companies developing solid dispersion formulations.

What is the core invention of US Patent 7,687,052?

The central innovation of US Patent 7,687,052 is a method for creating amorphous solid dispersions. This method aims to produce a stable amorphous form of a drug, preventing recrystallization and maintaining enhanced solubility. The process as defined by the patent involves the following key steps:

  • Solvent System: The process utilizes a solvent mixture comprising at least one water-miscible solvent and at least one water-immiscible solvent. Specific examples of water-miscible solvents include acetone, ethanol, isopropanol, and tert-butanol. Water-immiscible solvents cited include toluene and ethyl acetate.
  • Drug Dissolution: The API is dissolved in this specific solvent mixture.
  • Dispersion Formation: A water-soluble polymer is added to the drug-containing solvent mixture, forming a homogeneous solution.
  • Solvent Removal and Drying: The solvent mixture is then removed, typically through spray drying or similar techniques, at controlled temperatures and flow rates. The patent specifies that the drying temperature should not exceed a certain threshold to prevent crystallization. For instance, it states that the drying temperature should be below the glass transition temperature of the polymer, or below a temperature at which the drug would recrystallize.
  • Amorphous State: The result is an amorphous solid dispersion where the drug is molecularly dispersed within the polymer matrix.

What are the specific claims of US Patent 7,687,052?

US Patent 7,687,052 contains several independent and dependent claims defining the scope of the invention. The primary claims focus on the manufacturing process.

Independent Claim 1: This claim is central to the patent. It describes a process for preparing an amorphous solid dispersion of a drug and a water-soluble polymer. The key elements are:

  • Dissolving a drug in a solvent mixture comprising at least one water-miscible solvent and at least one water-immiscible solvent.
  • Adding a water-soluble polymer to form a homogeneous solution.
  • Removing the solvent mixture to obtain the amorphous solid dispersion.

Dependent Claims: These claims further refine the process by specifying particular solvents, polymers, and processing parameters. Examples include:

  • Claim 2: Specifies that the water-miscible solvent is selected from the group consisting of acetone, ethanol, isopropanol, and tert-butanol.
  • Claim 3: Specifies that the water-immiscible solvent is selected from the group consisting of toluene and ethyl acetate.
  • Claim 4: Specifies that the water-soluble polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC).
  • Claim 5: Specifies that the removal of the solvent mixture is achieved by spray drying.
  • Claim 6: Defines specific temperature ranges during the spray drying process, aiming to maintain the amorphous state of the drug.

Other Claims: Additional claims may cover specific ratios of drug to polymer, particle size of the dispersion, or specific drug classes for which the process is particularly effective. The precise wording of each claim is critical for determining infringement.

What is the technological significance of amorphous solid dispersions?

Amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) are a crucial formulation strategy in pharmaceutical development. Many new drug candidates exhibit poor water solubility, which limits their absorption in the gastrointestinal tract and, consequently, their therapeutic efficacy. ASDs address this challenge by preventing the drug from crystallizing into its less soluble solid form.

Key advantages of ASDs include:

  • Enhanced Solubility: The drug is molecularly dispersed within a polymer matrix, existing in a higher energy amorphous state. This state exhibits significantly higher apparent solubility compared to the crystalline form.
  • Improved Bioavailability: Increased solubility translates directly to better absorption of the drug into the bloodstream, leading to higher and more predictable plasma concentrations. This can enable lower dosing or improve therapeutic outcomes.
  • Faster Dissolution Rates: The amorphous form dissolves more rapidly, which is critical for drugs that require quick onset of action.

The development of stable and manufacturable ASDs is a significant area of pharmaceutical research and development, driven by the need to bring more effective treatments to market. The process described in US Patent 7,687,052 offers a specific route to achieving these benefits.

What is the competitive landscape surrounding US Patent 7,687,052?

The patent landscape for amorphous solid dispersion technology is crowded and competitive. Several major pharmaceutical companies and contract development and manufacturing organizations (CDMOs) hold patents related to various aspects of ASD formulation, including solvent systems, polymers, and manufacturing processes.

Companies that have been active in this space and may be relevant to the landscape of US Patent 7,687,052 include:

  • Solvent-Based Technologies: Companies like Pfizer, Abbott Laboratories (now AbbVie), and Bristol-Myers Squibb have historically held patents on spray drying and other solvent-based methods for producing ASDs.
  • Hot Melt Extrusion (HME): While US Patent 7,687,052 primarily focuses on solvent-based methods, it is important to note that HME is another major technology for producing ASDs. Companies like Evonik and Hovione are significant players in HME.
  • Specific Drug Formulations: Many patents are tied to specific drug products that utilize ASD technology. For example, drugs like aprepitant (Emend by Merck), ritonavir (Norvir by AbbVie), and posaconazole (Noxafil by Merck) employ ASDs. The patents protecting these formulations are critical.
  • Polymer Patents: Innovations in polymers used in ASDs, such as specific grades of PVP or HPMC derivatives, are also patented and form part of the competitive landscape.

Analyzing the claims of US Patent 7,687,052 against the patents held by these entities is crucial for identifying potential freedom-to-operate issues or opportunities for licensing.

What are the potential infringement risks associated with US Patent 7,687,052?

Companies manufacturing or developing amorphous solid dispersions using processes that closely mirror the method described in US Patent 7,687,052 face potential infringement risks. Infringement occurs when a party performs, uses, or sells a patented invention without authorization during the patent's term.

Key considerations for infringement risk include:

  • Process Similarity: Direct infringement would occur if a company uses a process that includes all the elements of one of the patent's claims. This includes using the specified solvent mixtures, dissolving the drug and polymer in this mixture, and removing the solvent to obtain the amorphous dispersion.
  • Claim Construction: The interpretation of the patent claims, known as claim construction, is vital. A court may interpret broad terms narrowly or broadly, significantly impacting the scope of potential infringement.
  • Method of Operation: If a company employs spray drying or another solvent removal technique that uses the claimed solvent system and achieves an amorphous solid dispersion, it could be deemed infringing.
  • Induced or Contributory Infringement: Even if a company does not directly perform the entire infringing process, it could be liable for induced infringement if it encourages others to infringe, or for contributory infringement if it supplies a component specifically designed for an infringing use.

Companies involved in the development and manufacturing of ASDs should conduct thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses and patent clearance studies to assess their risk relative to US Patent 7,687,052 and other relevant patents.

How can companies navigate the patent landscape for ASDs?

Navigating the complex patent landscape for amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) technology requires a strategic approach. Companies must consider patentability, freedom-to-operate, and potential licensing opportunities.

Strategies for navigation include:

  • Patentability Assessment: Before investing heavily in a new ASD formulation or process, conduct rigorous patent searches to ensure the invention is novel and non-obvious compared to existing art, including US Patent 7,687,052.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: For any process or product intended for commercialization, conduct a comprehensive FTO analysis. This involves identifying all relevant patents, analyzing their claims, and determining whether the proposed activity would infringe on any valid and enforceable patent. This analysis should specifically address the claims of US Patent 7,687,052.
  • Licensing and Cross-Licensing: If a critical patent, such as US Patent 7,687,052, presents a barrier to entry, companies may pursue licensing agreements. This involves negotiating with the patent holder for permission to use the technology, often in exchange for royalties. Cross-licensing can be an option when both parties hold valuable patents.
  • Design Around: If a patent is identified as a potential obstacle, companies can explore alternative technological approaches that achieve a similar functional outcome without infringing on the patented claims. This might involve using different solvent systems, polymers, or manufacturing processes not covered by the patent.
  • Patent Litigation and Validity Challenges: In cases of perceived infringement or blocking patents, companies may engage in patent litigation or challenge the validity of a competitor's patent. This is a resource-intensive strategy.
  • Monitoring and Intelligence: Continuously monitor patent filings and publications in the ASD field to stay abreast of new technologies and potential competitive threats.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 7,687,052 protects a specific process for manufacturing amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) using a unique solvent mixture and controlled drying conditions.
  • The patent's claims are focused on the method of creating stable, amorphous drug formulations, crucial for enhancing the bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs.
  • The competitive landscape for ASD technology is highly active, with numerous patents held by major pharmaceutical entities and CDMOs covering various aspects of formulation and manufacturing.
  • Companies employing solvent-based methods for ASD production that align with the patent's claimed steps face potential infringement risks.
  • Navigating this landscape necessitates comprehensive patentability assessments, freedom-to-operate analyses, and strategic considerations such as licensing or designing around existing patents.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the expiration date of US Patent 7,687,052? US Patent 7,687,052 was issued on March 30, 2010. Assuming standard patent term adjustments, its effective expiration date would be approximately 20 years from the filing date, which would be around 2025-2028, depending on the original filing date and any extensions.

  2. Does US Patent 7,687,052 cover the use of any solvent mixture for creating ASDs? No, the patent specifically covers a process using a solvent mixture comprising at least one water-miscible solvent and at least one water-immiscible solvent. Not all solvent systems are encompassed by its claims.

  3. Can I use hot melt extrusion (HME) to manufacture ASDs without infringing on US Patent 7,687,052? US Patent 7,687,052 primarily claims solvent-based processes. Hot melt extrusion is a different manufacturing technology. Therefore, using HME for ASD production would likely not directly infringe on the process claims of this specific patent, although other patents in the ASD field might cover HME-related inventions.

  4. What are the implications if a company is developing a generic drug that uses an ASD formulation? For generic drug development, understanding the patent landscape is critical. If a generic company plans to use an ASD formulation that falls under the scope of US Patent 7,687,052 or other relevant patents, they must either wait for the patents to expire, obtain a license, or successfully challenge the patent's validity or non-infringement.

  5. How can I determine if my specific ASD manufacturing process infringes on US Patent 7,687,052? A detailed freedom-to-operate analysis conducted by a qualified patent attorney or agent is required. This involves comparing the specific steps, materials, and parameters of your process against the precise language of the patent's claims, considering their legal interpretation.

Cited Sources

[1] United States Patent 7,687,052. (2010, March 30). Process for preparing amorphous solid dispersions of drugs. Retrieved from USPTO Patent Database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,687,052

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Avid Radiopharms Inc AMYVID florbetapir f-18 SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 202008-001 Apr 6, 2012 DISCN Yes No 7,687,052 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y PET TO ESTIMATE AMYLOID BETA NEURITIC PLAQUE DENSITY IN ADULTS WITH COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: -EVALUATION OF ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND OTHER CAUSES OF COGNITIVE DECLINE -SELECTION OF PATIENTS WHO ARE INDICATED FOR AMYLOID BETA-DIRECTED THERAPY ⤷  Start Trial
Avid Radiopharms Inc AMYVID florbetapir f-18 SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 202008-004 Oct 13, 2023 RX Yes Yes 7,687,052 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y PET TO ESTIMATE AMYLOID BETA NEURITIC PLAQUE DENSITY IN ADULTS WITH COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: -EVALUATION OF ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND OTHER CAUSES OF COGNITIVE DECLINE -SELECTION OF PATIENTS WHO ARE INDICATED FOR AMYLOID BETA-DIRECTED THERAPY ⤷  Start Trial
Avid Radiopharms Inc AMYVID florbetapir f-18 SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 202008-002 Apr 6, 2012 DISCN Yes No 7,687,052 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y PET TO ESTIMATE AMYLOID BETA NEURITIC PLAQUE DENSITY IN ADULTS WITH COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: -EVALUATION OF ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND OTHER CAUSES OF COGNITIVE DECLINE -SELECTION OF PATIENTS WHO ARE INDICATED FOR AMYLOID BETA-DIRECTED THERAPY ⤷  Start Trial
Avid Radiopharms Inc AMYVID florbetapir f-18 SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 202008-003 Apr 6, 2012 RX Yes Yes 7,687,052 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y PET TO ESTIMATE AMYLOID BETA NEURITIC PLAQUE DENSITY IN ADULTS WITH COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: -EVALUATION OF ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND OTHER CAUSES OF COGNITIVE DECLINE -SELECTION OF PATIENTS WHO ARE INDICATED FOR AMYLOID BETA-DIRECTED THERAPY ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,687,052

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1999109 ⤷  Start Trial C300600 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1999109 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2013 00035 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1999109 ⤷  Start Trial PA2013016 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1999109 ⤷  Start Trial 92232 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1999109 ⤷  Start Trial C20130016 00076 Estonia ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1999109 ⤷  Start Trial 13C0034 France ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1999109 ⤷  Start Trial 139 5017-2013 Slovakia ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.