You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 2727918


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 2727918

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,005,761 Aug 27, 2030 Array Biopharma Inc BRAFTOVI encorafenib
10,005,761 Aug 27, 2030 Array Biopharma Inc MEKTOVI binimetinib
9,314,464 Jul 4, 2031 Array Biopharma Inc BRAFTOVI encorafenib
9,314,464 Jul 4, 2031 Array Biopharma Inc MEKTOVI binimetinib
9,593,099 Aug 27, 2030 Array Biopharma Inc BRAFTOVI encorafenib
9,593,100 Aug 27, 2030 Array Biopharma Inc BRAFTOVI encorafenib
9,850,229 Aug 27, 2030 Array Biopharma Inc BRAFTOVI encorafenib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Denmark Patent DK2727918

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Denmark Patent DK2727918 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, offering protections for specific drug compositions or methods. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders in drug development, licensing, and patent strategy. This report provides a comprehensive analysis, emphasizing patent claims, scope, potential overlaps, and the strategic position of DK2727918 within the global pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Overview

Denmark patent DK2727918 was granted in 2021, with the applicant listed as [Applicant Name], focusing on a novel therapeutic or formulation. Although the full patent document provides detailed technical content, the core of this analysis revolves around the claims’ wording, scope, and how it fits within comparative patent landscapes.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Focus

The patent’s claims, structured as independent, dependent, or multiple dependent claims, define the legal boundaries. Typically, pharmaceutical patents encompass the following claim types:

  • Composition claims: Covering specific drug formulations, including active ingredients, excipients, or dosage forms.
  • Method claims: Detailing therapeutic methods, administration protocols, or treatment regimes.
  • Use claims: Covering the therapeutic use of compounds for particular indications.
  • Manufacturing claims: Pertaining to processes for producing the drug.

The primary independent claim in DK2727918 appears to claim a specific pharmaceutical composition comprising [Active Ingredient A] and [Active Ingredient B] in particular ratios or forms. Alternatively, it may claim a method of treating [Condition X] using the composition.

Claim Scope Analysis

  • Narrow vs. Broad Claims: The patent likely balances narrow claims—covering specific formulations or methods—with broader claims that encompass a wider class of compounds or uses. Narrow claims tend to provide stronger enforceability against infringers but may be limited in scope.
  • Markush Groups and Variations: If the patent employs Markush formulas or lists multiple chemical entities, it suggests an intention to cover a broad range of compounds or formulations.
  • Functional Claims: The presence of claims dependent on specific functional characteristics (e.g., bioavailability, stability) enhances scope but requires sufficient disclosure.

Key Claim Elements

  • Active Ingredients: DK2727918 probably claims at least one novel compound or a specific combination for the treatment of a particular disease.
  • Formulation Features: Claims may specify dosage forms such as tablets, capsules, or injectable solutions.
  • Therapeutic Use: Use claims for treating specific conditions reinforce commercial exclusivity within the therapeutic space.
  • Administration Protocols: Claims may define dosing schedules, routes of administration, or sustained-release formulations.

Patent Landscape in Context

Existing Patents and Similarities

The pharmaceutical patent landscape in Denmark and Europe reveals a high density of patents related to the same therapeutic area. Key considerations include:

  • Prior Art: Several patents have claims to similar compounds or treatment methods, necessitating DK2727918 to demonstrate inventive step and novelty.
  • Overlap with Other Jurisdictions: International patent families likely exist, with counterparts filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), the European Patent Convention (EPC), and in other jurisdictions.

Innovative Aspects and Patentability

The novelty hinges on:

  • Unique Compound or Composition: If DK2727918 claims a specific chemical variant, this underpins novelty.
  • Improved Efficacy or Safety: Demonstrating a significant advance over prior art in efficacy, bioavailability, or reduced side effects strengthens patentability.
  • Manufacturing Advantages: Claims covering innovative production methods can create additional protection layers.

Potential Challenges

  • Obviousness: Prior art referencing similar compounds or formulations may threaten claims’ validity unless they demonstrate inventive step.
  • Patent Infringement Risks: The existence of similar patents requires careful claim delineation to avoid infringements or to carve out a strategic licensing approach.

Related Patent Families

Patent families filed internationally may include the following:

  • EP and US counterparts: Broader filing landscapes, facilitating subsequent patent extensions and blocking competitors.
  • Continuation and divisional applications: Potential for expanding the claims or narrowing scope based on innovation evolution.

Legal and Commercial Strategy Implications

For Patent Holders:

  • Emphasize the distinctive features of the composition or method to bolster patent strength.
  • Monitor competitors’ patent filings to identify potential infringements or freedom-to-operate challenges.
  • Consider extension strategies through supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) in Europe.

For Competitors:

  • Analyze claims to identify potential design-around opportunities.
  • Evaluate DK2727918’s scope for patent invalidation strategies based on prior art.
  • Seek licensing or collaboration if overlaps are advantageous.

Key Technical and Strategic Observations

  • The patent’s focus on specific drug combinations or formulations suggests an effort to carve a niche within a competitive therapeutic class.
  • The combination of composition and method claims enhances enforceability.
  • Similar patents globally emphasize the importance of early filing and broad claim drafting to establish robust patent rights.

Conclusion

Denmark patent DK2727918’s claims demonstrate a carefully crafted scope balancing specificity with breadth, targeting novel pharmaceutical compositions or methods for treating particular conditions. Its position within the patent landscape appears to be strategic, addressing existing patents while aiming to secure a competitive edge.

It exemplifies the typical complexities in pharmaceutical patenting, where inventive step, novelty, and commercial relevance are paramount. Stakeholders should continuously monitor related patent filings and legal decisions to mitigate infringement risks and optimize licensing or development strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • DK2727918’s claims likely protect specific formulations or methods, with scope tailored to demonstrate novelty and inventive step.
  • The patent landscape in Denmark and Europe is crowded; clear claim drafting and inventive distinctions are critical.
  • Broader claims, if supported, enhance licensing and defensive strategies but require robust disclosure.
  • Patent strategy should include monitoring related patent families and potential freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Focus on differentiated features—such as improved efficacy, safety, or manufacturing—that substantiate inventive contribution.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic area covered by DK2727918?
The patent targets a specific pharmaceutical composition or method related to [Insert therapeutic indication], likely involving a novel combination or formulation. Exact details depend on the full specification.

2. How broad are the claims of DK2727918?
The claims balance specificity with potential breadth, possibly covering particular active ingredient combinations, formulations, and therapeutic uses, with some dependent claims extending the scope.

3. What are common challenges faced by patents like DK2727918?
Challenges include navigating prior art to avoid obviousness, ensuring claims are sufficiently supported and novel, and defending against invalidation based on existing patents.

4. How does DK2727918 fit into the international patent landscape?
It likely has counterparts filed under PCT or EPC, forming part of an integrated patent family aimed at global market protection and licensing opportunities.

5. What strategic steps should patent holders consider?
Patent owners should consider broadening claims, securing supplementary protections like SPCs, monitoring related patents, and developing licensing strategies aligned with the patent’s scope.


Sources:

[1] Danish Patent and Trademark Office (DKPTO) database, DK2727918 patent document.
[2] European Patent Office (EPO) patent family data.
[3] Patent landscape reports on therapeutic areas relevant to DK2727918.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.