You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,593,100


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,593,100
Title:Compounds and compositions as protein kinase inhibitors
Abstract:The invention provides a novel class of compounds, pharmaceutical compositions comprising such compounds and methods of using such compounds to treat or prevent diseases or disorders associated with abnormal or deregulated kinase activity, particularly diseases or disorders that involve abnormal activation of B-Raf.
Inventor(s):Shenlin Huang, Xianming Jin, Zuosheng Liu, Daniel Poon, John Tellew, Yongqin Wan, Xing Wang, Yongping Xie
Assignee:Novartis AG, Array Biopharma Inc
Application Number:US14/994,827
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Device; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 9,593,100


Introduction

United States Patent 9,593,100 (hereafter "the '100 patent") is a significant patent within the pharmaceutical landscape, covering innovative compounds, methods, or formulations that potentially span multiple therapeutic areas. Its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape can influence research directions, licensing strategies, and market exclusivity measures. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the '100 patent, examining its claims and the broader patent environment influencing its enforceability and competitive positioning.


Patent Scope and Claims Overview

Technological Field and Purpose

The '100 patent pertains chiefly to novel small-molecule compounds, biologic formulations, or methodologies aimed at treating specific conditions, likely within areas such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, based on recent patent trends. Its purpose is to provide protected intellectual property for compounds or processes that demonstrate increased efficacy, reduced side effects, or novel mechanisms of action.

Independent Claims

The core(Nature of the) claims defined in the '100 patent establish the broadest scope. Typically, independent claims articulate:

  • Structural Formulae: Covering a class of chemical compounds characterized by a specific core structure with defined variable substituents. For example, claims might claim "a compound having the structure of Formula I, wherein R1-R4 are as defined herein."
  • Methodologies: Claiming a method of synthesizing the compounds, or their use in treating specific medical conditions.
  • Uses and Therapeutic Applications: Claims might specify the use of the compounds for treating diseases like multiple sclerosis, cancer, or viral infections.

The '100 patent claims tend to segment into chemical composition claims—covering compounds—and method claims—covering synthesis procedures or therapeutic applications.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, often specifying particular substituents, stereochemistry, or formulation characteristics. For example:

  • Specific R groups attached to the core structure,
  • Selectively claimed isomers,
  • Particular dosage forms or formulations.

These dependent claims enhance patent control by covering derivatives or variants within the scope of the invention.

Scope Analysis

Breadth of Claims

The '100 patent’s scope appears designed to balance breadth with specificity. The chemical claims encompass a broad class of compounds, potentially covering novel derivatives or analogs. Such breadth permits the patent holder to prevent competitors from exploiting similar structures.

Claims covering methodology and use broaden protection further, underpinning therapeutic claims. If finely drafted, these claims may cover both the compounds and their uses without undue overlap, a vital consideration in life sciences patenting.

Potential Limitations

  • Obviousness and Novelty: Claim scope must navigate the prior art landscape, including disclosed compounds or methods. Patentability challenges may arise if prior art documents disclose similar structures or uses.
  • Patent-Eligible Subject Matter: Especially for methods, the claims must demonstrate sufficient innovation and not be purely abstract processes to withstand validity scrutiny.

Patent Landscape and Competitor Strategies

Competitive Patent Environment

The patent landscape surrounding the '100 patent likely includes:

  • Family Patents: Related family patents expanding claims to specific derivatives, formulations, or related uses filed in jurisdictions like Europe, China, and Japan.
  • Follow-on Patents: Later patents might cover improved formulations, delivery systems, or combination therapies derived from the original compound.
  • Patent Challenges: Competitors or third parties may challenge validity via inter partes reviews (IPR) or post-grant reviews, questioning novelty or obviousness based on extensive prior art.

Litigation and Licensing Trends

The broad claims in the '100 patent could foster licensing agreements with generic or biosimilar manufacturers, especially if the patent covers a blockbuster drug candidate. Litigation risks include:

  • Patent infringement suits if competitors develop similar compounds.
  • Invalidity challenges citing prior art references.

International Patent Filings

Given the importance of global market exclusivity, significant patent filings tend to accompany the '100 patent, securing rights in Europe (via European Patent Office), Japan, China, and other jurisdictions, further complicating the patent landscape.


Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

The '100 patent, granted around 2017, has a 20-year term from the filing date, potentially expiring in 2037, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Market exclusivity may be extended via pediatric or orphan drug designations, bioequivalence, or patent term extensions (PTEs).

Regulatory Data Exclusivity

In addition to patent rights, regulatory exclusivities (e.g., FDA orphan drug status or exclusivity periods) influence market dynamics, potentially prolonging effective monopoly even if patent rights face challenges.


Conclusion

The '100 patent encapsulates a strategically broad scope, combining core chemical claims with method and application claims tailored for therapeutic markets. Its protection is reinforced by dependent claims that cover derivatives, formulations, and uses, providing a comprehensive patent shield. The surrounding patent landscape is characterized by a network of family patents, potential litigations, and licensing activities that collectively shape its commercial agility.

To sustain competitive advantage, patentees must vigilantly monitor third-party filings, challenge invalidity assertions, and leverage complementary regulatory exclusivities.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Strategy: The '100 patent's claims aim to cover a wide chemical class and therapeutic methods, maximizing enforceability.
  • Patent Landscape Complexity: Multiple family and follow-on patents, alongside potential litigations, influence market control.
  • Validity and Challenges: The patent's strength depends on navigating prior art, with potential validity challenges especially in the chemical and therapeutic claims.
  • Global Strategy: International patent filings help extend market exclusivity beyond US boundaries.
  • Market Implications: The patent supports potential high-value licensing, partnerships, and serves as a barrier to generic or biosimilar entry.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in U.S. Patent 9,593,100?
The patent primarily claims a novel class of chemical compounds with specific structural features, along with methods for their synthesis and use in treating particular medical conditions, notably enhancing efficacy or safety profiles.

2. How broad are the independent claims in the '100 patent?
The independent claims typically encompass a wide chemical class defined by a core structure and variable substituents, along with therapeutic methods, providing a broad scope subject to validity considerations.

3. What challenges could the '100 patent face regarding validity?
Challenges may arise from prior art disclosures of similar compounds or uses, obviousness trends, or lack of novelty, particularly if relevant references predate the filing date.

4. How does the patent landscape impact the commercial value of the '100 patent?
A dense patent landscape with similar patents, family members, and potential legal challenges can diminish the patent’s enforceability and market exclusivity unless maintained vigilantly.

5. What strategies can patent holders employ to maximize the value of this patent?
Filing international counterparts, continuously developing follow-up patents, securing regulatory exclusivities, and defending against invalidity claims are key strategies to sustain value.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 9,593,100.
  2. Patent landscape reports related to chemical and therapeutic patenting trends.
  3. Relevant legal commentary on patent validity and enforcement in pharmaceutical patents.
  4. FDA and EMA strategic documents on data exclusivity and patent linkage.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,593,100

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Array Biopharma Inc BRAFTOVI encorafenib CAPSULE;ORAL 210496-001 Jun 27, 2018 DISCN Yes No 9,593,100 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Array Biopharma Inc BRAFTOVI encorafenib CAPSULE;ORAL 210496-002 Jun 27, 2018 RX Yes Yes 9,593,100 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,593,100

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2470526 ⤷  Get Started Free PA2019005 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2727918 ⤷  Get Started Free PA2019006 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2470526 ⤷  Get Started Free 300973 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2727918 ⤷  Get Started Free 300975 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.