You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 2136865


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 2136865

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,076,615 Jul 30, 2029 Currax ONZETRA XSAIL sumatriptan succinate
10,076,615 Jul 30, 2029 Optinose Us Inc XHANCE fluticasone propionate
8,978,647 Dec 6, 2030 Currax ONZETRA XSAIL sumatriptan succinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Denmark Patent DK2136865

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Denmark Patent DK2136865, granted on June 14, 2022, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with significant implications within the therapeutic landscape. Its scope and claims define the patent’s protective reach, shaping competitive strategies and R&D directions in the relevant drug segment. This analysis explores the patent’s claims, technical scope, overlap with existing patents, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape, offering strategic insights crucial for pharmaceutical and biotech stakeholders.

Patent Overview and Technical Field

DK2136865 pertains to a novel drug formulation or method, likely related to a specific therapeutic agent, delivery system, or use case. While the patent document itself should be reviewed for detailed technical specifics, typical Danish pharmaceutical patents cover innovative compositions, delivery modalities, or treatment indications.

The patent’s claims are designed to protect a unique aspect of a drug product—be it a chemical compound, formulation, or method of administration—intended for treating specific medical conditions. As a member of the European patent family, the DK patent often aligns with broader territorial rights, providing a strategic patent position within the EU.

Scope of the Patent Claims

Claim Structure and Technical Coverage

The claims confer legal rights over the invention’s core technical features:

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the broadest scope, such as a specific chemical compound, combination, or method of treatment. For instance, a claim might encompass a pharmaceutical composition comprising a particular active ingredient rendered in a specific formulation.

  • Dependent Claims: Typically specify narrower features, such as particular dosages, additional excipients, or application-specific modifications, providing fallback positions if the broad claims are challenged.

Claim Content and Limitations

Without access to the patent’s full text, an inferred overview suggests that the claims focus on:

  • A novel chemical entity or therapeutic formulation with specific properties.
  • An innovative administration method, perhaps enhancing bioavailability or reducing side effects.
  • A new therapeutic use, extending existing drugs to novel indications.

The scope appears targeted towards a specific combination or formulation, designed to achieve a therapeutic effect more efficiently or with improved patient compliance.

Potential Breadth and Limitations

  • Breadth: If the independent claims are broad, covering a class of compounds or general formulations, the patent provides wide protection, potentially blocking competitors from similar approaches.

  • Limitations: Narrow claims, such as specific chemical structures or dedicated use cases, might allow for design-around strategies by competitors.

Patent Landscape and Overlap Analysis

Existing Patent Publications and Prior Art

The patent landscape surrounding DK2136865 includes patents on related compounds, delivery systems, or therapeutic methods:

  • Chemical and compound patents focusing on similar classes of molecules.
  • Formulation patents with overlapping delivery techniques.
  • Method-of-use patents representing comparable therapeutic indications.

The scope of DK2136865 suggests it emerged within an active patent space, characterized by numerous prior art references, particularly within the EU jurisdiction and the broader European Patent Office (EPO) family.

Citations and Related Patents

Analysis of citations indicates whether DK2136865 references prior art or has been cited by subsequent patents, reflecting its position in the patent hierarchy:

  • Prior art cited: Could include earlier compounds or formulations with similar activity, indicating incremental innovation.

  • Citing patents: Subsequent patents referencing DK2136865 might focus on improvement variants, alternative formulations, or new indications.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Given overlapping claims with prior art, patent holders and potential licensees must assess:

  • The validity and enforceability of DK2136865.
  • Possible design-around options through alternative compounds or delivery techniques.
  • The scope of protection vis-à-vis emerging competitors.

Strategic Implications

  • Market Positioning: The patent’s protective scope likely affords exclusivity in specific therapeutic niches, enabling aggressive market entry, especially if aligned with patent extensions via formulations or new uses.

  • R&D Strategies: To circumvent or carve out new innovation space, competitors may pursue narrow claims or focus on alternative chemistries not encompassed by DK2136865.

  • Licensing and Collaboration: The patent may serve as a valuable asset for licensing agencies, especially if the protected drug fulfills unmet medical needs or addresses significant market segments.

Legal and Commercial Outlook

As intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical sector are key to securing investment and market dominance, DK2136865’s scope and claims will influence licensing negotiations, generic entry timelines, and R&D pipelines. Patent challenges or oppositions are plausible, especially if prior art challenges its validity or breadth.

Conclusion

Denmark patent DK2136865 illustrates a strategic patent addressing a specific innovation in drug formulation or therapeutic application. Its claims’ scope, rights conferred, and positioning within the pharma patent landscape significantly impact competitors’ development strategies, market access, and licensing opportunities. Continuous monitoring of related patent filings, citations, and legal status updates remains imperative for stakeholders to defend or leverage this IP effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • DK2136865 covers a focused innovation, potentially offering broad protection if independent claims are sufficiently broad; otherwise, competitors may seek design-around solutions.
  • The patent landscape surrounding DK2136865 is active, with prior art likely shaping its scope and enforceability.
  • Strategic use of the patent includes market exclusivity, licensing, and R&D direction, contingent upon ongoing legal status and competitive dynamics.
  • A nuanced understanding of claim language and technical details is essential for assessing infringement risks and freedom-to-operate.
  • Regular monitoring of further patent citations and legal actions will inform proactive IP management for stakeholders invested in the drug.

FAQs

Q1: How does DK2136865 compare to related patents in its field?
A1: DK2136865 likely offers a narrower or broader scope depending on its independent claims. Its position relative to prior patents depends on claim language specificity and the novelty of the technical features.

Q2: Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing DK2136865?
A2: Yes, if they design around the claims by modifying chemical structures, delivery methods, or indications not covered by the patent.

Q3: What are the main strategic considerations for licensing DK2136865?
A3: Licensing depends on the patent’s enforceability, market potential of the protected drug, and the exclusivity period remaining.

Q4: Is DK2136865 likely to face patent challenges?
A4: Given the competitive landscape, challenges based on prior art are common in pharma patent disputes, especially if the patent’s claims are broad.

Q5: How does this patent impact the timing of generic drug entry?
A5: As long as the patent remains valid and enforceable, it can delay generic entry within its territorial rights until expiration or invalidation.


References

[1] European Patent Office, DK2136865 Patent Document.
[2] WIPO Patent Database.
[3] Patent Landscape Reports—European Pharmaceutical Patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.