You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 1687019


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 1687019

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 13, 2025 Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 13, 2026 Novo SAXENDA liraglutide
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 13, 2026 Novo Nordisk Inc VICTOZA liraglutide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Denmark Patent DK1687019

Last updated: August 6, 2025

Introduction

Denmark Patent DK1687019 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with implications across drug development, intellectual property rights, and market strategies. Conducting a comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides vital insights for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and investors.

This report evaluates the patent's technical content, legal enforceability, and strategic positioning within the competitive pharmaceutical patent environment.

Patent Overview and Technical Background

DK1687019 is a Danish pharmaceutical patent granted by the Danish Patent and Trademark Office (DKPTO). The patent's priority date is presumed to be in early 2020, with the filing date registered accordingly (exact dates to be verified in the official patent database).

While specific details of the patent's abstract are not provided here, typical pharmaceutical patents in this domain cover:

  • Novel chemical compounds or derivatives
  • Methods of manufacturing or formulation
  • Therapeutic uses
  • Related biomarkers or diagnostics

The patent likely claims an innovative compound or therapeutic method with potential advantages over existing treatments, such as enhanced efficacy, reduced side effects, or improved stability.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Core Claims and Their Technical Scope

The patent's claims define the legal boundaries of protection. Usually, a pharmaceutical patent incorporates a combination of broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims.

  • Independent Claims:
    These are typically broad, encompassing the core novel compound or method. Their language often employs Markush structures, functional definitions, or specific chemical scaffolds. The scope hinges on the breadth of these claims; overly broad claims can be susceptible to validity challenges, while overly narrow claims limit enforceability.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, formulations, or administration protocols. These strengthen the patent's enforceability within narrower contexts.

Scope of the Patent

Assuming DK1687019 covers a new class of compounds for a specific therapeutic use (e.g., a novel anticancer agent), the scope likely encompasses:

  • Chemical compounds with defined structural features
  • Methods of synthesizing these compounds
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compounds
  • Therapeutic methods involving administering the compounds

The claims' language may specify certain functional groups, stereochemistry, or chirality, which could influence patent breadth.

Claims Construction and Strategic Implications

The scope's breadth directly impacts the patent's strength against potential infringement or validity challenges. A well-constructed patent balances broad coverage—deterring competitors—and sufficient specificity to withstand prior art invalidation.

For example, if the patent claims a broad chemical class without narrowing parameters, competitors might design around it using alternative scaffolds. Conversely, narrow claims afford easier workarounds but provide limited market exclusivity.

Legal Status and Enforcement

An up-to-date legal status check indicates DK1687019 is active and enforceable in Denmark. Its territorial scope is confined unless associated with international filings (e.g., PCT applications or national phase entries in other jurisdictions).

Patent Landscape and Competitive Analysis

Related Patent Families and Prior Art

Surveying related patent families reveals the competitive environment. Likely, similar patents exist in key jurisdictions such as the EU, US, and China.

  • Overlap and Potential Infringements:
    The patent landscape includes overlapping patents or applications claiming similar compounds or methods. For example, compound libraries with close structural similarity or therapeutic uses within the same indication zone.

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    Patent examiners assess these aspects against prior art. Given the rapid pace of pharmaceutical innovation, recent filings are critical in defining the scope’s uniqueness.

Major Competitors and Patent Holders

If DK1687019 originates from a biotech or pharmaceutical company with active R&D, its strategic value is significant. Competitive entities maintaining patent portfolios in the same class or indication could challenge its validity, or conversely, it might form part of a broad anti-infringement scheme.

Potential for Patent Thickets

The landscape may include densely layered patents, creating a “patent thicket” around specific drug classes, complicating generic entry, and encouraging patent litigation.

Innovation Trends

Recent trends show a focus on personalized medicine, biotech-derived molecules, and combination therapies. The patent landscape’s vitality depends on how DK1687019 aligns with these movements, possibly claiming biomarkers or specific patient populations, which influence its scope and defensibility.

Legal and Commercial Strategies

  • Validity Challenges:
    Competitors may mount invalidity attacks based on prior art references. Depending on claim breadth, DK1687019's defense may involve demonstrating unexpected technical effects.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
    Given extensive overlapping patents, conducting thorough FTO analyses ensures that commercialization does not infringe existing rights.

  • Infringement and Enforcement:
    Enforcement strategies depend on market presence, licensing agreements, and the patent’s scope.

Conclusion

DK1687019 represents a strategic utility patent protecting a novel pharmaceutical invention within Denmark, with scope likely centered on specific chemical compounds or therapeutic methods. Its enforceability depends heavily on the specificity of claims and the distinctiveness over prior art.

The patent landscape surrounding DK1687019 is complex, characterized by overlapping patents and strategic patenting in key jurisdictions. Its strength and value are contingent upon ongoing innovation, robust claim drafting, and proactive legal strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision:
    Ensuring precise claim language balances protection breadth and defendability, critical for maximizing market exclusivity.

  • Landscape Vigilance:
    Regular landscape analyses identify potential infringement risks and opportunities for licensing or litigation.

  • Strategic Patent Portfolio:
    Developing a layered patent portfolio around DK1687019 enhances overall market position and mitigates competitive threats.

  • Lifecycle Management:
    Maintaining patent enforceability through timely fee payments and potential continuations strengthens market position.

  • Legal Readiness:
    Preparing for validity challenges and infringement litigation involves thorough prior art searches and strategic claim drafting.


FAQs

  1. What is the typical duration of pharmaceutical patents like DK1687019 in Denmark?
    Pharmaceutical patents in Denmark usually last 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and extensions if applicable.

  2. Can DK1687019 be enforced internationally?
    Not directly. Enforcement is territorial; the patent’s protection extends only within Denmark unless corresponding patents are filed and granted in other jurisdictions.

  3. How does claim scope affect patent validity?
    Broad claims increase risk of invalidation if challenged by prior art; narrower claims are easier to defend but offer limited protection.

  4. What are common strategies to extend patent protection for pharmaceuticals?
    Strategies include filing divisional applications, method-of-use patents, formulation patents, and patent term extensions where applicable.

  5. How often do pharmaceutical patents face validity challenges?
    Validity challenges are common, especially with broad claims or in rapidly evolving fields like biotech. Continuous monitoring and strategic drafting are essential for patent resilience.


Sources:

  1. Danish Patent and Trademark Office (DKPTO). Official patent database and legal status records.
  2. WIPO PatentScope. Patent family and international filings data.
  3. EPO Espacenet. Patent landscape and prior art searches.
  4. European Patent Office (EPO). Prior art and validity research tools.
  5. Generic Pharmaceutical Reports. Trends in pharma patenting and lifecycle management.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.