You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Germany Patent: 602005018601


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Germany Patent: 602005018601

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Sep 28, 2026 Bristol Myers Squibb SPRYCEL dasatinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent DE602005018601: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Germany

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Patent DE602005018601 pertains to innovative pharmaceutical compositions or methods that have been granted patent protection in Germany. This patent, filed under the German Patent Office (DPMA), is part of the broader landscape of drug patent protection, which is crucial for pharmaceutical companies seeking exclusivity for novel therapeutics and formulations. Understanding its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or strategic patent positioning within Germany and Europe.


Patent Overview and Legal Context

  • Filing and Grant Details:
    Patent DE602005018601 was filed in 2005 and subsequently granted, providing exclusivity typically lasting 20 years from the filing date, subject to annuities and maintenance fees [1].

  • Legal Rights Imparted:
    The patent grants its holder the right to prevent third parties from manufacturing, using, selling, or importing the patented invention without authorization within Germany. This territorial scope is crucial, as it does not automatically extend to other jurisdictions.

  • Relevance to European Patent Law:
    As part of the European patent system, German patents often align with European Patent Convention (EPC) standards, but national validation procedures influence scope and enforcement in Germany.


Scope of the Patent

1. Claim Structure and Focus

The core of any patent is its claims, which define the legal scope of protection. In the case of DE602005018601, the claims encompass:

  • Independent Claims:
    Likely describe a specific pharmaceutical composition or method of treatment involving particular active ingredients, dosages, or delivery mechanisms.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Specify further embodiments, such as combinations with other therapeutic agents, specific formulations, or optimized manufacturing processes.

Note: The actual claims detail the inventive features—whether they concern novel compounds, combinations, or methods of administration. Precise scope depends on claim wording, which should be interpreted narrowly or broadly, as appropriate.

2. Active Ingredient and Formulation Specifics

Patent DE602005018601 appears to cover a specific drug composition, potentially involving:

  • A novel active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or a known API with a new delivery system.
  • A particular method of preparation optimized for bioavailability.
  • A novel therapeutic indication targeted by the composition.

Implication: The scope may cover both the chemical entity and its specific therapeutic applications, depending on the claim language.

3. Therapeutic Method Claims

In addition to compositions, the patent might include method claims—covering specific treatment protocols—adding to the protective scope by preventing others from using these methods commercially.

4. Limitations and Exclusivity

While providing protection within Germany, the scope is limited geographically. The claims’ breadth depends on their wording, with broader claims covering more variants but potentially more vulnerable to invalidation for lack of inventive step or clarity.


Claims Analysis

Legal and Strategic Significance of the Claims

  • Broad vs. Narrow Claims:
    Broad claims increase market exclusivity but risk invalidity if found obvious or lacking novelty. Narrow claims provide narrower protection but are easier to defend.

  • Possible Claim Types:

    • Composition claims: Cover specific drug formulations.
    • Method claims: Cover treatment protocols.
    • Use claims: Cover novel therapeutic uses, if present.
    • Manufacturing process: Protect specific production methods.

Relevance of Claims to Patentability

  • Novelty:
    The claimed invention must be new compared to prior art, including earlier patents, scientific literature, and existing products.

  • Inventive Step:
    The claims should involve an inventive step—an improvement over existing technologies.

  • Industrial Applicability:
    The invention must be capable of industrial application within the pharmaceutical sector.

Note: The validity and enforceability depend heavily on the precise claim language, which must navigate the strict standards of German patent law, especially under the European Patent Convention.


Patent Landscape in Germany for Similar Drugs

1. Key Competitors and Patent Families

The landscape surrounding DE602005018601 involves several elements:

  • Patent Families:
    Related patents filed internationally under PCT or EPC jurisdictions protect similar innovations, creating a broader geographical coverage.

  • Competitor Patents:
    Major pharmaceutical entities, such as Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, or Novartis, may hold similar or blocking patents covering the same therapeutic classes or API modifications.

  • Citations and Prior Art:
    Numerous prior art references influence the patent’s scope, including existing formulations and known therapeutic methods. The patent examiner's citation history reflects this landscape.

2. Freedom-to-Operate and Patent Thickets

The existence of overlapping patents within the same therapeutic space can create "patent thickets," complicating entry or commercialization in Germany. Companies often perform freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses to assess risks.

3. Patent Validity and Litigation

The robustness of DE602005018601 depends on its validity, which may be challenged via opposition procedures or litigation. Germany’s specialized courts favor substantive examination, and patent validity can be contested based on inventive step or added subject matter.


Enforcement and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity:
    Given the typical 20-year term, this patent affords significant market protection if maintained and enforced.

  • Potential Infringements:
    Competitors using modified formulations or different delivery methods may attempt to circumvent the claims, prompting potential infringement disputes.

  • Licensing Opportunities:
    The patent offers avenues for licensing, especially if it covers a proven therapeutic agent with commercial value.


Conclusion

Patent DE602005018601 provides focused protection through its claims, primarily targeting specific compositions and potentially therapeutic methods within Germany. Its scope hinges on claim language, which balances broad protection with defensibility. The broader patent landscape reveals a competitive environment where similar patents and prior art threaten enforcement and commercial strategy. For entities operating in the German pharmaceutical space, thorough patent landscape analysis and strategic claim management remain critical for leveraging this patent.


Key Takeaways

  • DE602005018601’s scope is primarily defined by its claims, emphasizing specific drug compositions or treatment methods.
  • Claim breadth influences patent strength; broad claims confer more protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges.
  • The patent landscape around this patent includes competitors' patents, patent thickets, and prior art, impacting freedom to operate.
  • Enforcement depends on maintaining patent validity and navigating potential litigation risks.
  • Strategic licensing and vigilant monitoring of similar patents are essential for optimizing commercial opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: How can I determine if my product infringes on DE602005018601?
A1: Conduct a detailed comparison of your product's composition and claims language; consult patent attorneys for a thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis.

Q2: What are the main factors that could invalidate this patent?
A2: Lack of novelty, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure; prior art citations and opposition proceedings in Germany can challenge validity.

Q3: Does this patent cover only the active ingredient or the formulation?
A3: Depending on its claims, it may cover the active ingredient itself, specific formulations, or methods of use; review the claims for precise coverage.

Q4: Can this patent be extended or renewed?
A4: Generally, patents are valid for 20 years; maintenance fees must be paid regularly to sustain enforceability.

Q5: How does this patent landscape influence drug development in Germany?
A5: A dense patent environment can create barriers to entry, but offers licensing opportunities; thorough patent mapping mitigates infringement risks.


References

[1] German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA). "Patent Term and Maintenance."

[2] European Patent Convention (EPC). "Patentability Standards and Enforcement."

[3] FICPI. "Patent Claim Drafting and Strategy."

[4] European Patent Office (EPO). "Patent Landscape Reports."


Note: For precise legal interpretation or strategic decisions, consulting a patent attorney specialized in German pharmaceutical patents is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.