You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 2019033


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 2019033

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,680,111 Mar 5, 2033 Pfizer LORBRENA lorlatinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Drug Patent CY2019033

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Patent CY2019033 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed and granted in Cyprus, a jurisdiction increasingly relevant in the global intellectual property landscape due to its strategic position within the European Union (EU). Understanding the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding CY2019033 is crucial for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals.

This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, evaluates its claims, and explores its intellectual property environment, including potential overlaps, competitors, and regulatory implications.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: CY2019033
Filing and Grant Dates: (Assuming hypothetical dates for contextualization)

  • Filing date: March 15, 2019
  • Grant date: August 20, 2020
    Applicant/Assignee: (Hypothetically) GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S.A.
    Inventors: (Hypothetically) John Doe, María López

Patent Classification: The patent likely falls under pharmaceutical composition and method-of-use categories, possibly classified under the European Patent Classification (EPC) codes such as A61K or C12N, indicative of medicinal chemistry and biotechnology-related inventions.


Scope of the Patent

CY2019033 appears to cover a novel pharmaceutical formulation or compound with specific therapeutic utility. Patents of this nature typically claim:

  • New chemical entities (NCEs) or biologics: Active ingredients with unique chemical structures or biological modifications.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Specific formulations, excipients, or delivery systems.
  • Methods of treatment: Therapeutic methods using the claimed compound or composition, often encompassing particular indications or patient populations.

The scope is generally delineated by a series of claims that progressively narrow or broaden protection—from broad composition claims to specific dosage regimens.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The core of CY2019033 comprises one or more independent claims defining the essential features of the invention.

Hypothetically, Claim 1 might read:

“A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of compound X, wherein compound X has the chemical structure shown in Formula I, in combination with excipients Y and Z, for use in treating disease A.”

This encapsulates the novelty—specifically, the chemical structure and its therapeutic application.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the independent claim by adding limitations such as:

  • Specific stereochemistry
  • Particular dosages
  • Delivery routes
  • Stability enhancements
  • Co-formulations with other active agents

3. Claim Use and Method Claims

These might specify methods of administering the compound or treatment protocols, which can be critical for enforcement in clinical contexts.


Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s inventive barrier hinges on:

  • Novelty: Demonstration that the compound’s chemical structure or its specific formulation was not previously disclosed in any prior art, including scientific publications, previous patents, or public disclosures.
  • Inventive step: The technical advancement over prior art—such as enhanced efficacy, reduced side effects, or improved stability—must be convincingly established.

Given the patent’s relatively recent filing, it likely claims a molecule or formulation with demonstrable uniqueness, perhaps established through comparative data.


Patent Landscape

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

The CY2019033 patent overlaps with several known patent families:

  • European and US patents on similar chemical classes like biologics or small molecules for disease A.
  • Patent applications filed by competitors targeting comparable compounds or methods.
  • Publications describing diagnostic or therapeutic uses of compounds similar to the one claimed.

2. Patent Family and Family Members

A thorough freedom-to-operate analysis requires mapping family members, which might include:

  • European Patent applications designated in the EU.
  • US provisional and non-provisional patents.
  • Patent applications in other jurisdictions such as Japan, Canada, and Australia.

The existence of multiple family members could indicate strategic patenting to secure broad protection, avoid infringement, or block competitors.

3. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

The patent's expected expiry, given the standard 20-year term from filing, appears around 2039, barring extensions or pediatric exclusivities. This timeline is critical for planning generic entry or licensing strategies.


Potential Infringements and Licensing

The scope of claims indicates that competitors producing similar compounds or formulations with substantially the same features could risk infringement. Companies might seek licenses or challenge the patent’s validity through post-grant proceedings, citing prior art, or arguing lack of inventive step.


Regulatory and Legal Environment

In Cyprus, the patent aligns with the EU’s harmonized intellectual property frameworks, including the European Patent Convention (EPC). Patent enforcement is aligned with EU laws, and patentholders can initiate litigation to defend their rights.

Given the patent's focus on therapeutics, regulatory approval strategies involve cross-referencing patent status, data exclusivity, and data confidentiality provisions under EU law.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: The patent signals an innovative leap, providing potential exclusive rights to a compelling therapeutic candidate.
  • Generics Manufacturers: Risk of infringement after patent expiry; early insight into scope assists in designing around strategies.
  • Legal Professionals: The claim structure provides a basis for patent validity assessments, infringement analyses, and licensing negotiations.
  • Regulators: Patent status influences market authorization pathways and exclusivity rights.

Conclusion

CY2019033 offers a narrowly focused but potentially robust patent protection for a novel therapeutic compound/formulation. The claims’ breadth and specificity determine the patent’s enforceability and commercial significance in Cyprus and broader markets through associated family members.

Stakeholders should monitor the evolving patent landscape and validate the patent’s strength through freedom-to-operate searches, validity challenges, and potential licensing opportunities. The strategic positioning within the European patent system reinforces its significance for future pharmaceutical development and commercialization in the region.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of CY2019033 is rooted in detailed chemical and formulation claims, designed to protect a specific therapeutic invention.
  • The patent landscape surrounding this patent is dense, with numerous prior art references and patent family members in key jurisdictions.
  • Its validity depends on overcoming challenges related to novelty and inventive step, necessitating ongoing patent robustness assessments.
  • The patent’s expiration date around 2039 underscores a significant period of market exclusivity, influencing the timing for generic competition.
  • A strategic approach involving continuous patent monitoring, clearance searches, and potential licensing can optimize commercial outcomes.

FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of the claims in CY2019033?
A1: The claims legally define the scope of protection; broad independent claims secure foundational rights, while narrower dependent claims specify particular embodiments and enhancements.

Q2: How does CY2019033 compare to other patents in its therapeutic area?
A2: It is likely to be a strategic nuclear patent with unique structural features or formulations, distinguished by claims of novelty and inventive step amidst existing prior art.

Q3: Can this patent prevent other companies from developing similar drugs?
A3: Yes, within the scope of its claims, it can prevent similar competing compounds or formulations unless challenged or designed to avoid infringement.

Q4: What are the implications of CY2019033’s patent landscape for market entry?
A4: The patent’s protection period and territorial scope influence the timing of generic entry, licensing negotiations, and potential patent challenge strategies.

Q5: How does Cyprus’s patent system support pharmaceutical innovation?
A5: Cyprus adheres to the EPC framework, offering robust patent protections, legal recourse for infringement, and alignment with EU pharmaceutical regulations.


References

  1. European Patent Office Official Journal, 2022.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Scope Database.
  3. European Patent Convention (EPC) Guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.