Last Updated: June 25, 2026

LORBRENA Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Lorbrena patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Lorbrena is a drug marketed by Pfizer and is included in one NDA. There are four patents protecting this drug.

This drug has one hundred and twenty-five patent family members in fifty countries.

The generic ingredient in LORBRENA is lorlatinib. Two suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the lorlatinib profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Generic Entry Outlook for Lorbrena

Lorbrena was eligible for patent challenges on November 2, 2022.

By analyzing the patents and regulatory protections it appears that the earliest date for generic entry will be July 27, 2036. This may change due to patent challenges or generic licensing.

Indicators of Generic Entry

< Available with Subscription >

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for LORBRENA?
  • What are the global sales for LORBRENA?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for LORBRENA?
Summary for LORBRENA
International Patents:125
US Patents:4
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 2
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 58
Clinical Trials: 6
Patent Applications: 1,301
Drug Prices: Drug price information for LORBRENA
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in LORBRENA?LORBRENA excipients list
DailyMed Link:LORBRENA at DailyMed
DrugPatentWatch® Estimated Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) Date for LORBRENA
Generic Entry Date for LORBRENA*:
Constraining patent/regulatory exclusivity:
NDA:
Dosage:

TABLET;ORAL

*The generic entry opportunity date is the latter of the last compound-claiming patent and the last regulatory exclusivity protection. Many factors can influence early or later generic entry. This date is provided as a rough estimate of generic entry potential and should not be used as an independent source.

Recent Clinical Trials for LORBRENA

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
SCRI Development Innovations, LLCPhase 2
PfizerPhase 2
Guangdong Association of Clinical TrialsPhase 2

See all LORBRENA clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for LORBRENA

LORBRENA is protected by five US patents and one FDA Regulatory Exclusivity.

Based on analysis by DrugPatentWatch, the earliest date for a generic version of LORBRENA is ⤷  Start Trial.

This potential generic entry date is based on patent 11,020,376.

Generics may enter earlier, or later, based on new patent filings, patent extensions, patent invalidation, early generic licensing, generic entry preferences, and other factors.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Pfizer LORBRENA lorlatinib TABLET;ORAL 210868-001 Nov 2, 2018 RX Yes No 10,420,749 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer LORBRENA lorlatinib TABLET;ORAL 210868-002 Nov 2, 2018 RX Yes Yes 10,420,749 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer LORBRENA lorlatinib TABLET;ORAL 210868-001 Nov 2, 2018 RX Yes No 11,299,500 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer LORBRENA lorlatinib TABLET;ORAL 210868-002 Nov 2, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer LORBRENA lorlatinib TABLET;ORAL 210868-001 Nov 2, 2018 RX Yes No 11,020,376 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

EU/EMA Drug Approvals for LORBRENA

Company Drugname Inn Product Number / Indication Status Generic Biosimilar Orphan Marketing Authorisation Marketing Refusal
Pfizer Europe MA EEIG Lorviqua lorlatinib EMEA/H/C/004646Lorviqua as monotherapy is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‑positive advanced non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously not treated with an ALK inhibitor.Lorviqua as monotherapy is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with ALK‑positive advanced NSCLC whose disease has progressed after:alectinib or ceritinib as the first ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy; orcrizotinib and at least one other ALK TKI. Authorised no no no 2019-05-06
>Company >Drugname >Inn >Product Number / Indication >Status >Generic >Biosimilar >Orphan >Marketing Authorisation >Marketing Refusal

International Patents for LORBRENA

When does loss-of-exclusivity occur for LORBRENA?

Based on analysis by DrugPatentWatch, the following patents block generic entry in the countries listed below:

Argentina

Patent: 5507
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Australia

Patent: 16304420
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Brazil

Patent: 2017028604
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Canada

Patent: 37257
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

China

Patent: 7849060
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 6063322
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 6063323
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Cyprus

Patent: 23689
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Denmark

Patent: 28867
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 98222
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

European Patent Office

Patent: 28867
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 98222
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Finland

Patent: 98222
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Hong Kong

Patent: 52845
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Hungary

Patent: 52790
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 65536
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Japan

Patent: 18253
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 17039702
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Mexico

Patent: 2600
Patent: FORMA CRISTALINA DE BASE LIBRE DE LORLATINIB. (CRYSTALLINE FORM OF LORLATINIB FREE BASE)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 5263
Patent: FORMA CRISTALINA DE BASE LIBRE DE LORLATINIB (CRYSTALLINE FORM OF LORLATINIB FREE BASE)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 18001324
Patent: FORMA CRISTALINA DE BASE LIBRE DE LORLATINIB. (CRYSTALLINE FORM OF LORLATINIB FREE BASE.)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 21002220
Patent: FORMA CRISTALINA DE BASE LIBRE DE LORLATINIB. (CRYSTALLINE FORM OF LORLATINIB FREE BASE.)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

New Zealand

Patent: 9304
Patent: Crystalline form of lorlatinib free base
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 8505
Patent: Crystalline form of lorlatinib free base
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Poland

Patent: 28867
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 98222
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Portugal

Patent: 28867
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 98222
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Russian Federation

Patent: 18101363
Patent: Кристаллическая форма свободного основания лорлатиниба
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Singapore

Patent: 201913200X
Patent: CRYSTALLINE FORM OF LORLATINIB FREE BASE
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Slovenia

Patent: 28867
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 98222
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

South Korea

Patent: 2088188
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 180022936
Patent: 롤라티닙 유리 염기의 결정질 형태
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Spain

Patent: 42302
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 72010
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Taiwan

Patent: 1718600
Patent: Crystalline form of lorlatinib free base
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 16449
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Generics may enter earlier, or later, based on new patent filings, patent extensions, patent invalidation, early generic licensing, generic entry preferences, and other factors.

See the table below for additional patents covering LORBRENA around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Argentina 105507 FORMA CRISTALINA DE BASE LIBRE DE LORLATINIB ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2016304420 Crystalline form of lorlatinib free base ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112017028604 forma cristalina de base livre de lorlatinibe ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2937257 FORME CRISTALLINE D'UNE BASE EXEMPTE DE LOLATINIB (CRYSTALLINE FORM OF LORLATINIB FREE BASE) ⤷  Start Trial
China 107849060 劳拉替尼游离碱的结晶形式 (Crystalline form of lorlatinib free base) ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for LORBRENA

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
2822953 CA 2019 00041 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: LORLATINIB ELLER ET FARMACEUTISK ACCEPTABELT SALT DERAF; REG. NO/DATE: EU/1/19/1355 20190508
2822953 301006 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: LORLATINIB, DESGEWENST IN DE VORM VAN EEN FARMACEUTISCH AANVAARDBAAR ZOUT; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/19/1355 20190508
2822953 2019C/539 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), OTHER
2822953 122019000088 Germany ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: LORLATINIB ODER PHARMAZEUTISCH ANNEHMBARES SALZ DAVON; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/19/1355 20190506
2822953 LUC00131 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: LORLATINIB OU UN SEL PHARMACEUTIQUEMENT ACCEPTABLE QUI EN DERIVE; AUTHORISATION NUMBER AND DATE: EU/1/19/1355 20190508
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description
Last updated: June 9, 2026

Lorbrena (lorlatinib) Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory: Exclusivity, Patent/IP Risk, and Revenue Outlook

Lorbrena (lorlatinib) is an AstraZeneca kinase inhibitor with sales driven by first-line and subsequent-line adoption in ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), supported by durable clinical outcomes and expanding label breadth across lines of therapy. Near-term financial trajectory is shaped by (1) patent and regulatory exclusivity timing, (2) uptake in competitive ALK landscapes, (3) generic entry risk, and (4) payer behavior around high-cost oncology therapies.

What drives Lorbrena sales growth in ALK-positive NSCLC?

Which patient segments contribute most to revenue

Lorbrena’s revenue base concentrates in ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC, including:

  • First-line metastatic disease (where Lorbrena has meaningful positioning versus earlier-generation ALK inhibitors).
  • Post–ALK TKI progression settings, including patients with resistance after prior ALK inhibitors.
  • Brain metastases cohorts, where lorlatinib’s CNS penetration translates into differentiated clinical adoption patterns versus agents with weaker intracranial activity.

How line-of-therapy affects adoption

Lorbrena monetization is highly sensitive to:

  • Share capture in first-line use (higher volume, longer treatment exposure).
  • Retention in later lines (driven by efficacy in refractory populations and physician familiarity).
  • Sequencing dynamics as clinicians balance “front-loading” lorlatinib versus using earlier ALK inhibitors before switching.

Payer and hospital procurement dynamics

Key commercial constraints that typically shape oncology launch curves and plateau dynamics:

  • Formulary positioning through prior authorization and step-therapy rules.
  • Site-of-care pharmacy economics for high-cost oral oncology drugs.
  • Net price pressure from contracting, rebates, and patient assistance programs, especially where multiple ALK options are formularized.

How strong is the Lorbrena patent estate versus generic entry risk?

What patents protect lorlatinib in the US

Lorbrena’s IP posture relies on a combination of:

  • Active ingredient composition patents covering lorlatinib.
  • Polymorph/crystal form and salt-related patents (where present in the portfolio).
  • Formulation and dosage form patents (tablet/capsule embodiments and manufacturing controls).
  • Method-of-use patents tied to ALK-positive NSCLC treatment regimens.

When does exclusivity end for Lorbrena?

Sales durability is driven by two layers:

  • Patent expiration dates (composition, formulations, and method-of-use).
  • FDA regulatory exclusivities (including patent term extensions where applicable and any data exclusivity tied to clinical submissions).

What generic entry risks exist for Lorbrena

Generic entry risk is dominated by:

  • Whether ANDA filers can design around composition and method-of-use claims.
  • Whether Paragraph IV certifications lead to litigation.
  • Whether settlement agreements delay launch beyond the earliest patent expiry date.

Does Lorbrena face biosimilar risk or only generic small-molecule competition?

Lorbrena is a small-molecule targeted therapy (lorlatinib), so it does not face biosimilar pathways. Competitive risk comes from:

  • Generic lorlatinib (ANDA) after patent and exclusivity barriers fall.
  • “Authorized generics” and launch-day readiness by established generics.
  • Potential class competition from other ALK inhibitors, including newer-generation agents or next-line CNS-optimized options that can pressure share without IP invalidation.

What is the Orange Book status of Lorbrena?

How to read Lorbrena Orange Book listings

Lorbrena’s Orange Book status typically maps to:

  • Drug product and active ingredient entries.
  • Patent codes (therapeutic equivalence and patent categories).
  • Submission dates and expiration dates for each listed patent.

Which patent categories matter most for market exclusivity

  • Composition of matter patents generally control the longest runway.
  • Method-of-use patents can delay launch even where composition claims are challenged.
  • Formulation/manufacturing patents can create additional design-around complexity.

Which companies compete with Lorbrena, and how does the ALK landscape impact revenue?

Primary ALK inhibitor competitors

Competitive pressure typically comes from:

  • Other next-generation ALK TKIs (with strong intracranial efficacy) that contest first-line and post-progression patient share.
  • Earlier-generation ALK TKIs that remain used in selected sequencing algorithms.

How competitive intensity changes Lorbrena pricing

In markets with multiple formularized ALK options:

  • Net price erosion accelerates through tendering and contracting.
  • Manufacturers trade rebates and access commitments for share preservation.
  • Cost-effectiveness arguments become central for health technology assessment (HTA) bodies in major ex-US markets.

What patent litigation affects Lorbrena, including Paragraph IV and settlements?

How Paragraph IV strategy impacts launch timing

If Paragraph IV challenges target key patents:

  • Filing triggers 30-month stay dynamics if litigation is initiated.
  • Courts can narrow claims or uphold broad coverage depending on claim construction and prior art.
  • Settlement can create “clock-stopping” delays that keep Lorbrena on market exclusivity longer than the earliest expiring listed patent.

Settlement-driven revenue protection

Settlement scenarios typically:

  • Delay generic approval/launch date.
  • Include licensing terms or non-infringement commitments.
  • Create phased entry schedules by dosage strength or geography.

(Commercial impact is tied to whether the first generic arrives at the earliest allowed date or later due to litigation or settlement.)

How do first-line label strength and CNS data translate to financial trajectory?

Why CNS efficacy changes adoption

For ALK-positive NSCLC, intracranial disease is a high-frequency clinical need. Treatments with robust CNS activity:

  • Convert “monitor then treat” brain metastasis pathways into earlier adoption.
  • Increase durability when intracranial progression is a major discontinuation reason for other agents.

Impact on treatment duration

Longer time-on-treatment generally increases:

  • Cumulative drug exposure per patient.
  • The probability of sustained revenue if discontinuation rates stay low.

What is Lorbrena’s commercial trajectory by year, and what are the inflection points?

Launch-to-plateau mechanics

Lorbrena’s financial curve typically follows:

  • Early growth driven by physician adoption and expanding indication coverage.
  • Mid-period plateau where:
    • Patient identification stabilizes after biomarker testing maturity.
    • Competitive contracting begins to influence net revenue.
  • Later dynamics driven by:
    • First-line share capture.
    • Market expansion into additional geographies.
    • Patent-driven risk perception shifting toward or away from generic threat.

Key inflection points to monitor

Revenue inflection is most sensitive to:

  • FDA label expansions that widen eligible patients.
  • Results from confirmatory trials that increase payor confidence.
  • Patent events: expiry milestones, litigation outcomes, and settlement delays.
  • Competitive launches that add alternative ALK options on formularies.

How do regulatory milestones and FDA pathway status affect timing and market access?

FDA approvals and line-of-therapy label updates

Financial trajectory is shaped by:

  • Timing of approvals in successive treatment lines.
  • New subpopulations (such as CNS disease emphasis) that expand prescriber eligibility.

US market access

US adoption depends on:

  • Coverage determinations by major payers.
  • Pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) contracting.
  • Oncology drug access programs that can offset patient affordability barriers.

Non-US market access

Outside the US, revenue is driven by:

  • National HTA decisions and reimbursement rates.
  • Pricing frameworks and discounting norms.
  • Tender procurement processes in countries with centralized purchasing.

How does Lorbrena compare with competing ALK inhibitors on market and IP resilience?

Share and durability comparison framework

Market resilience is usually determined by:

  • Whether the drug is a preferred first-line regimen.
  • Whether it holds intracranial efficacy superiority across resistance categories.
  • Whether the patent estate includes multiple layers that raise generic “design-around” cost.
  • Whether litigation historically supported longer exclusivity.

What to measure for financial trajectory

  • Net sales trend versus category growth (ALK oncology).
  • Prescribing shift from older TKIs.
  • Payer formulary share across large managed care plans.
  • Price and rebate changes as competitors gain or lose leverage.

What manufacturing and IP barriers could slow generic entry for lorlatinib?

Even after approvals, entry can be slowed by:

  • Formulation-specific manufacturing controls.
  • Patent claims covering dosage form and stability requirements.
  • Supply chain readiness for oral oncology drugs.
  • Complexities in bioequivalence where formulation or salt/crystal properties matter.

These barriers can extend “commercial exclusivity” beyond the legal milestone dates if generic readiness is delayed.

Key Takeaways

  • Lorbrena’s revenue is driven by sustained adoption in ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC, with CNS efficacy acting as a key share catalyst.
  • The financial trajectory depends on the combined effect of patent lifetimes, regulatory exclusivity, and any Paragraph IV litigation or settlements.
  • Competitive intensity from other ALK inhibitors influences net price, formulary placement, and line-of-therapy sequencing.
  • Biosimilar risk is not applicable; generic (ANDA) risk and class competition are the main disruptive forces.
  • Near- and mid-term outlook is most sensitive to patent expiration cadence, litigation outcomes, and payer contracting dynamics.

FAQs

  1. What is the most important driver of Lorbrena adoption in ALK-positive NSCLC?
  2. Which patent categories typically determine the latest generic entry date for lorlatinib?
  3. How do Paragraph IV challenges and 30-month stays change Lorbrena’s sales protection window?
  4. Does Lorbrena’s CNS activity affect payer access and hospital formulary decisions?
  5. What commercial signals indicate whether Lorbrena revenue will plateau or decline ahead of generic risk?

References

  1. FDA. “Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations.” U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.