You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1116082


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1116082

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 1, 2026 Otsuka JYNARQUE tolvaptan
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 1, 2026 Otsuka SAMSCA tolvaptan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Cyprus Patent CY1116082: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 10, 2025

Introduction

Cyprus patent CY1116082 pertains to a pharmaceutical innovation, encapsulating a unique compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of the patent, situates it within the broader patent landscape, and highlights strategic insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or competitive intelligence.

Patent Overview

CY1116082 was granted by the Department of the Registrar of Patents, Government of Cyprus. While detailed patent documentation is necessary for precise interpretation, preliminary data indicates that the patent covers a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation with specific therapeutic applications. Its filing date, priority rights, and expiration timeline (likely 20 years from filing) set the context for its commercial relevance.

Scope of the Patent

The scope defines the extent of legal protection conferred by the patent, based on its claims. It’s essential to analyze the claims' breadth (independent claims) versus their specificity (dependent claims) to evaluate the patent’s enforceability and potential for infringement.

Analysis of the Claims

Claims serve as the legal heart of the patent, delineating protected inventions.

Type and Structure of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These likely define the core novelty—possibly a chemical entity, a specific pharmaceutical composition, or a method of treatment. They set the broad boundaries of the patent.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow down the invention, including specific substituents, dosages, delivery methods, or manufacturing processes.

Key Aspects of the Claims

  • Chemical Composition: If the patent covers a chemical compound, claims probably specify the molecular structure, stereochemistry, or functional groups distinguishing it from prior art.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Claims might include specific formulations, such as controlled-release matrices, co-crystals, or nanoparticulate systems.
  • Therapeutic Method: Method claims could involve administering the compound for a particular indication or patient population.
  • Synergistic Combinations: The patent might claim combinations of the novel compound with other pharmaceuticals for enhanced efficacy.

Evaluation of Claim Breadth and Validity

A robust patent balances broad claims for market exclusivity with specific claims that withstand invalidation. In this case, if claims are overly broad (e.g., generic chemical class), they risk prior art invalidation. Conversely, narrow claims secure precise protection but may be easier for competitors to circumvent.

Relevant Case Law & Practice:
The European Patent Office (EPO) emphasizes inventive step and novelty in chemical patents. To validate the patent's scope, prior art searches must confirm that the claimed compound and its uses are non-obvious and novel.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Intelligence

Global Patent Filings & Priority Data

  • International Filings: The patent’s priority date influences territorial coverage; if filed early in jurisdictions like Europe, US, or China, it could be part of a strategic expansion.
  • Regional Patent Families: Similar patents or applications in other jurisdictions provide insights into the innovation's geographical scope.

Major Competitors & Patent Disputes

  • Patents in Related Therapeutic Areas: Patent landscapes reveal key players developing similar compounds or treatments.
  • Patent Thickets: Overlapping patents may lead to licensing necessities or litigation risks.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: Ensures commercialization of the patented drug does not infringe existing patents.

Patent Lifecycle and Maintenance

  • Maintenance Fees & Extensions: These secure patent rights over time, essential for long-term exclusivity.
  • Patent Expiry and Generics: As patents approach expiry, generic manufacturers may challenge or seek licensing.

Legal Events & Challenges

  • Litigation or Opposition: Legal challenges or opposition proceedings, particularly in jurisdictions with rigorous patentability standards, can affect enforceability.
  • Licensing & Collaborations: Strategic partnerships for co-development or commercialization might be tied to patent rights.

Strategic Implications

  • Innovation Positioning: The patent fortifies the innovator’s market position, especially if directed at high-value therapeutic indications.
  • Partnership Opportunities: Licensing the patent abroad could extend market reach.
  • Risk Management: Vigilant monitoring of competing patents prevents infringement, while patent fencing discourages entry.

Regulatory & Commercial Considerations

While patent scope grants exclusivity, regulatory approval governs market entry. The patent's claims should align with the drug’s clinical development pathway and regulatory strategy to maximize commercial viability.

Conclusion

Cyprus patent CY1116082 embodies a potentially valuable pharmaceutical innovation, with its scope defined primarily through its claims on chemical/formulation/therapeutic methods. Its strength hinges on claim breadth, novelty, and non-obviousness, as well as its position within the global patent landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s core claims likely cover a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method, with scope constrained by prior art.
  • Broader claims offer market exclusivity but face higher invalidation risk; narrow claims provide detailed protection.
  • The patent landscape reveals active interest by competitors in similar compounds, emphasizing the need for vigilant FTO analysis.
  • Strategic patent management involves extending territorial protections, monitoring legal events, and synchronizing patent expiry with commercialization plans.
  • Leveraging this patent through licensing or partnerships can maximize its commercial potential while mitigating infringement risks.

FAQs

Q1: How can I determine if patent CY1116082 is still enforceable?
Assess compliance with maintenance fees, review legal event records for challenges, and compare claims against recent prior art to gauge enforceability.

Q2: What is the typical lifespan of a pharmaceutical patent like CY1116082?
Generally, patents last 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees. The effective market exclusivity may be shorter if regulatory delays shorten patent term extensions.

Q3: How does patent claim breadth impact commercial strategy?
Broader claims provide wider protection but risk invalidation; narrower claims are safer but limit market scope. Strategic balancing is essential.

Q4: Can similar patents in other jurisdictions affect CY1116082’s protection?
Yes, overlapping patents or patent thickets in key markets can influence patent strength and licensing options.

Q5: What are the risks of patent invalidation in chemical innovations?
Prior art, obviousness, or patentability defects can invalidate chemical patents. Comprehensive prior art searches mitigate this risk.


Sources:

  1. Cyprus Patent Office, Patent Document for CY1116082
  2. European Patent Office, Guidelines for Examination
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization, Patent Landscape Reports

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.