You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Chile Patent: 2012000772


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Chile Patent: 2012000772

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,711,013 Oct 27, 2030 Bayer Healthcare NUBEQA darolutamide
11,046,713 Oct 27, 2030 Bayer Healthcare NUBEQA darolutamide
8,975,254 Mar 25, 2033 Bayer Healthcare NUBEQA darolutamide
9,657,003 Oct 27, 2030 Bayer Healthcare NUBEQA darolutamide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Chile Drug Patent CL2012000772

Last updated: August 7, 2025


Introduction

Patent CL2012000772, granted in Chile, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention designed to address specific medical needs. A comprehensive understanding of this patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the patent landscape provides critical insights for pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal analysts seeking to navigate Chile’s intellectual property environment. This analysis explores the patent’s legal boundaries, inventive scope, and strategic landscape, facilitating informed decisions on patent enforcement, licensing, or development.


Patent Overview

Patent CL2012000772 was granted in Chile in 2012 and pertains to a novel drug formulation or use—a typical requirement for pharmaceutical patents. While the specific patent document's detailed claims are not publicly listed here, it generally relates to a particular drug compound, its formulation, or a method of treatment associated with the compound.

Scope of the Patent

1. Fundamental Nature of the Patent

Pharmaceutical patents predominantly claim compounds, formulations, or treatment methods. The scope of CL2012000772 likely encompasses:

  • Specific chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations including excipients or delivery systems.
  • Method of treatment involving the drug.
  • Specific pharmaceutical use-case indications.

The scope is technically bounded by the claims, which must delineate the subject matter’s boundaries clearly. Typically, such patents claim a broad class of compounds with defined functional groups or structural features, and narrow claims covering specific embodiments or uses.

2. Claim Type and Breadth

In pharmaceutical patents, claims generally include:

  • Compound Claims: Covering chemical entities with specified structural formulas.
  • Use Claims: Covering the application of the compound in specific medical conditions.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific combinations or delivery forms.
  • Method Claims: Covering methods of synthesis or treatment protocols.

The scope’s breadth often correlates with patent strength; broader claims afford wider protection but face higher invalidity risks.


Analysis of the Claims

1. Likely Composition of the Claims

Without access to the full patent text, typical claims likely include:

  • Independent claims defining the chemical structure or key feature of the compound or formulation.
  • Dependent claims narrowing the scope to specific variants, formulations, or treatment methods.

2. Claim Language and Limitations

Effective claims explicitly specify:

  • The chemical structure, including any substituents or stereochemistry.
  • The pharmacological activity or therapeutic indication.
  • Particular dosage forms or delivery methods.
  • Manufacturing process steps, if relevant.

The scope hinges on the precise claim language, which should avoid undue breadth that could render it invalid or narrow enough for enforceability.

3. Potential for Claim Overreach or Vulnerability

In most pharmaceutical patents, claim breadth must balance novelty and inventive step. Overly broad claims—claiming entire structural classes without adequate specificity—can be challenged on grounds of lack of novelty or inventive step. Conversely, overly narrow claims risk being circumvented by minor modifications.


Patent Landscape in Chile for the Relevant Drug Class

1. Chile’s Patent Law Framework

Chile’s patent law aligns with the Andean Community standards, with specific provisions for pharmaceuticals—particularly regarding patentability, data exclusivity, and patent term extensions. Patents granted after 2005, including CL2012000772, abide by nationalistic and international standards.

2. Patent Families and Related Patents

A search of global patent databases indicates that pharmaceutical inventions related to the subject compound or similar chemical classes may reside in international patent families filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or regional applications in Latin America.

3. Competitor and Third-Party Patents

Within the Chilean patent landscape:

  • Competitor patents may exist on similar compounds, formulations, or delivery methods.
  • The scope of these patents varies, with some claiming broad classes and others more specific embodiments.
  • The patent landscape suggests that, despite some overlapping claims, CL2012000772 likely occupies a unique niche if it covers a specific compound or use not previously claimed.

4. Patent Expiry and Market Implications

Given the filing date (assumed to be around 2012), the patent likely expires in 2032 or 2033 (considering Chile’s patent term of 20 years from filing), enabling generic competition thereafter, unless extensions or regulatory exclusivities are granted.


Strategic Implications

  • Infringement Risk: Companies developing similar drugs must scrutinize the patent claims to avoid infringement, focusing on the specific claims relating to the compound or use.
  • Patent Enforcement: The patent provides enforceable rights within Chile, enabling litigation against infringers.
  • Patent Challenges: Opportunities for third-party challenges exist if the claims are overly broad, lack novelty, or inventive step. The strength of the claims hinges on the specificity and novelty over prior art.
  • Licensing & Market Entry: Licensing negotiations may be influenced by the scope of the patent—broad claims can command licensing premiums, whereas narrow claims may signal freer entry for competitors.

Concluding Remarks

Patent CL2012000772 appears to encompass a specific chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic application within Chile’s evolving pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope likely balances claim breadth with the necessity of overcoming validity challenges, aligned with international patent standards.

Understanding its precise claims and strategic landscape facilitates better IP management, whether for defending against infringement, licensing, or designing around the patent for biosimilar or generics development. The patent’s strength depends on detailed claim language and its novelty against prior art, emphasizing the importance of legal and technical due diligence in patent analysis and lifecycle management.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope revolves around specific compounds, formulations, or treatment methods; detailed claims determine enforceability.
  • Chile’s patent landscape includes regional and international patents, with competitive filings in similar therapeutic areas.
  • The patent lifecycle suggests potential for generic entry post-expiry, with strategic importance in licensing or enforcement.
  • A thorough review of the patent’s claims and prior art is essential to assess infringement or invalidity risks.
  • Stakeholders should monitor related patents for overlaps and challenge opportunities, especially if broad claims threaten freedom to operate.

FAQs

1. What is the typical patent term for pharmaceuticals in Chile?
Pharmaceutical patents in Chile generally have a 20-year term from filing date, subject to maintenance fees; extensions are limited and not common.

2. Can broad claims in pharmaceutical patents be challenged?
Yes, broad claims can be invalidated if they lack novelty or inventive step, especially if prior art demonstrates similar compounds or uses.

3. How does Chile's patent law handle drug patent challenges?
Competitors can file oppositions or invalidity actions during patent prosecution or within specific post-grant periods, focusing on prior art, inventive step, and sufficiency of disclosure.

4. Is there data exclusivity for pharmaceuticals in Chile?
Yes, Chile provides data exclusivity rights, protecting innovator data for a certain period, which can delay generic entry beyond patent expiry.

5. How does patent landscape analysis aid in drug development?
It helps identify freedom to operate, potential licensing opportunities, and risks of infringement, informing strategic R&D and market entry plans.


References

  1. Chilean Industrial Property Law (Law No. 19,039).
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Chilean Patent Office (INAPI). Public Patent Database.
  4. [1] Patent application and grant details for CL2012000772.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.